FDG Uptake in Large-Vessel Giant Cell Arteritis After Short-term, High-Dose Steroid Treatment
Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Large-Vessel Giant Cell Arteritis After Short-term, High-Dose Steroid Treatment - A Diagnostic Window of Opportunity?
1 other identifier
observational
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Giant cell arteritis (GCA) affects large and medium sized vessels. Large vessel-GCA (LV-GCA) affecting aorta and/or its main branches is seen a) together with temporal arteritis (AT-GCA), b) as isolated LV-GCA but also c) with polymyalgia rheumatica. There is a risk of vision loss and cerebral thromboembolic events or great vessel injury in GCA. With delayed or inadequate treatment mortality and morbidity increases. This highlights the need of fast diagnosis and early treatment. The cornerstone in the diagnosis of GCA is a positive temporal artery biopsy. Patients with LV-GCA have more general, but less cephalic symptoms than patients with AT-GCA. Also, biopsy from large vessels can rarely be done and only 50% have a positive temporal artery biopsy (TAB). Hence, diagnosis often rely on imaging. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG PET)/CT has shown high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and is believed to be superior to other imaging modalities in the diagnosis of LV-GCA . The impact of FDG PET/CT in the management of LV-GCA has been evaluated and has shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy in a significant proportion of patients. However, studies have indicated a lower sensitivity in steroid treated patients. The aim of this study, was to evaluate the effect of steroid treatment on large-vessel FDG uptake in new-onset, treatment-naive LV-GCA by repetitive FDG PET/CT pre- and post therapeutic. With insights into the diagnostic capabilities after treatment is initiated, the possibility of timely treatment and confident diagnostic work up will improve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedSeptember 18, 2017
October 1, 2016
1.9 years
October 12, 2016
September 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of large vessel-GCA patients with post-therapeutic FDG uptake consistent with a diagnosis of large vessel giant cell arteritis
Proportion of patients with PET positive large vessel vasculitis defined as vascular FDG uptake≥3, semiquantitative assesment ad modum Meller
Assessed after intervention (3 or 10 days of treatment, respectively)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in quantitive uptake values (SUV)
From baseline to post-treatments scan (3 or 10 days of treatment, respectively)
Change in quantitive uptake values (TBR)
From baseline to post-treatments scan (3 or 10 days of treatment, respectively)
Study Arms (2)
PET3
Post-therapeutic FDG PET/CT performed after 3 days of steroid treatment
PET10
Post-therapeutic FDG PET/CT performed after 10 days of steroid treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Steroid-naive, newly-diagnosed giant cell arteritis patients
You may qualify if:
- Clinical suspicion of GCA; Cranial symptoms, new-onset extremity claudication or protracted constitutional symptoms (weight loss \> 5 kilograms or fever \>38C for \> 3 weeks).
- C reactive protein \>15 mg/l or erythrocyte sedimentation rate \>40 mm/h
- FDG PET/CT verified LV-GCA (steroid-naive) defined by FDG uptake in the aortic wall and/or supra-aortic branches with FDG uptake score ≥3.
You may not qualify if:
- oral glucocorticoid treatment within the past month
- subcutaneously, intramuscularly, intraarticularly or intravenously administered glucocorticoid within the past 2 months
- treatment with DMARDs or other immunosuppressive therapy ongoing or within the past 3 months
- ongoing treatment with interleukin2
- any disease mimicking GCA, including
- a) autoimmune diseases with possible aortitis; rheumatoid arthritis, Cogans syndrome, relapsing polychondritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Buerger's disease, Bechet's disease, inflammatory bowel disease
- b) infections with possible aortitis: syphilis, known active current or history of recurrent tuberculosis, hepatitis or HIV
- c) other large-vessel disease: sarcoidosis, neurofibromatosis, congenital coarctation, Marfans syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, retroperitoneal fibrosis
- body weight of \>150 kg.
- Previously diagnosed and treated for PMR or GCA
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Rheumatology
Aarhus, 8000, Denmark
Related Publications (4)
Puppo C, Massollo M, Paparo F, Camellino D, Piccardo A, Shoushtari Zadeh Naseri M, Villavecchia G, Rollandi GA, Cimmino MA. Giant cell arteritis: a systematic review of the qualitative and semiquantitative methods to assess vasculitis with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:574248. doi: 10.1155/2014/574248. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
PMID: 25254211BACKGROUNDStellingwerff MD, Brouwer E, Lensen KDF, Rutgers A, Arends S, van der Geest KSM, Glaudemans AWJM, Slart RHJA. Different Scoring Methods of FDG PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis: Need for Standardization. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(37):e1542. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001542.
PMID: 26376404BACKGROUNDFuchs M, Briel M, Daikeler T, Walker UA, Rasch H, Berg S, Ng QK, Raatz H, Jayne D, Kotter I, Blockmans D, Cid MC, Prieto-Gonzalez S, Lamprecht P, Salvarani C, Karageorgaki Z, Watts R, Luqmani R, Muller-Brand J, Tyndall A, Walter MA. The impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of patients with suspected large vessel vasculitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Feb;39(2):344-53. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1967-x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
PMID: 22072285BACKGROUNDPrieto-Gonzalez S, Depetris M, Garcia-Martinez A, Espigol-Frigole G, Tavera-Bahillo I, Corbera-Bellata M, Planas-Rigol E, Alba MA, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Grau JM, Lomena F, Cid MC. Positron emission tomography assessment of large vessel inflammation in patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a prospective, case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1388-92. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204572. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
PMID: 24665112BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Temporal artery biopsies, whole blood, serum, plasma
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Prof MD PhD
Department of Rheumatology , Aarhus University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2016
First Posted
September 18, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-10