Study Stopped
Due to implementation of an urgent safety measure, enrollment and dosing in R475-PN-1612 was stopped; enrolled participants entered the 20-week safety follow-up
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
FACT CLBP 1
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fasinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
2 other identifiers
interventional
63
1 country
56
Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab in relieving Chronic low back pain (CLBP) as compared to placebo in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip when treated for up to 16 weeks. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum over time when participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip are treated for up to 16 weeks; To evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab when treated for up to 16 weeks in participants with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe non-radicular CLBP and OA of the knee or hip.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Oct 2017
56 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 30, 2021
CompletedJune 30, 2021
June 1, 2021
6 months
September 14, 2017
April 26, 2021
June 9, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Average Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
Average daily low back pain (LBP) was assessed on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and was defined as the average of the non-missing daily LBPI NRS scores for the 7 days before and including nominal visit. Participants described their average low back pain during the past 24 hours on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.
Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) Total Score
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Low Back Pain (LBP) Score
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Participants Achieving ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in Average Daily LBPI NRS Score
Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Score
Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Up to Week 36
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fasinumab
EXPERIMENTALSubcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks (Q4W)
Placebo
EXPERIMENTALSC every 4 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of non-radicular moderate-to-severe CLBP for ≥3 months (prior to screening visit)
- Clinical diagnosis of OA in at least 1 hip or knee joint based on the American College of Rheumatology Criteria with radiographic evidence of OA (K-L ≥2) at screening
- History of inadequate relief of CLBP from non-pharmacologic therapy
- Willing to undergo joint replacement (JR) surgery, if necessary
- History of regular analgesic medication use
- History of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for chronic LBP
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is not a candidate for MRI
- History of major trauma or back surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit
- History or presence of pyriformis syndrome
- Evidence on baseline lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging of potentially confounding conditions
- History or evidence on joint imaging of conditions that may confound joint safety evaluation
- Evidence or symptoms consistent with autonomic dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension and/or autonomic symptoms) as defined in the protocol
- Recent use of longer acting pain medications
- Other medical conditions that may interfere with participation or accurate assessments during the trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticalslead
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (56)
Regeneron Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85704, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92801, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Anaheim, California, 92805, United States
Regeneron Research Site
La Mesa, California, 91942, United States
Regeneron Research Site
North Hollywood, California, 91606, United States
Regeneron Research Site
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Regeneron Research Site
San Marcos, California, 92078, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Santa Ana, California, 92703, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Spring Valley, California, 91978, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Whittier, California, 90602, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Waterbury, Connecticut, 06708, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Miami, Florida, 33155, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Ocoee, Florida, 34761, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Port Orange, Florida, 32127, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34232, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30189, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904, United States
Regeneron Research Site #1
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Regeneron Research Site #2
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60602, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383, United States
Regeneron Research Site
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017, United States
Regeneron Research Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Bay City, Michigan, 48706, United States
Regeneron Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Berlin, New Jersey, 08009, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Hartsdale, New York, 10530, United States
Regeneron Research Site
New York, New York, 10036, United States
Regeneron Research Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Fargo, North Dakota, 58105, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45431, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702, United States
Regeneron Research Site #1
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Regeneron Research Site #2
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77058, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Katy, Texas, 77498, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Plano, Texas, 75075, United States
Regeneron Research Site
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53144, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Enrollment and study drug administration was stopped due to an urgent safety measure. As a result the small number of participants enrolled in this study limited the interpretability of the efficacy results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trial Management
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2017
First Posted
September 18, 2017
Study Start
October 30, 2017
Primary Completion
May 5, 2018
Study Completion
May 2, 2019
Last Updated
June 30, 2021
Results First Posted
June 30, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06