VO2peak and Exercise Efficiency in Upper-body Poling
Comparison of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Exercise Efficiency Between Upper-body Poling and Arm Crank Ergometry in Trained Paraplegic and Able-bodied Participants
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and exercise efficiency in upper-body poling versus arm crank ergometry in trained able-bodied and paraplegic participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2017
CompletedSeptember 15, 2017
September 1, 2017
8 months
September 13, 2017
September 13, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Peak oxygen uptake
Peak oxygen uptake was measured during an incremental test to exhaustion.
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
paraplegic
OTHERWell-trained participants with a spinal cord injury (\<Th1) were included in this group.
able bodied
OTHERUpper-body trained, able-bodied participants were included in this group.
Interventions
An incremental peak test to exhaustion and four 5-min submaximal stages were performed in the upper-body double-poling mode.
An incremental peak test to exhaustion and four 5-min submaximal stages were performed in the arm crank ergometry mode.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- participants between the age of 18 and 50
- well upper-body-trained participants with or without paraplegia
You may not qualify if:
- people with injuries or sicknesses that might have impacted the testing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologylead
- St. Olavs Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Elite Sports Research
Trondheim, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jorunn Helbostad, phd prof
Dept of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2017
First Posted
September 15, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 15, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- September 2016-May 2017
All data will be de-identified by the project coordinator. The de-identified data will be stored on the NTNU server in a folder that only the JKB and ØS have access to. For analysing the data, parts of the de-identified data might be distributed amongst the four researchers and two master students linked to this study.