NCT03283709

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of an all-ceramic dental crown material to restore the abutment teeth of partially-edentulous patients who need removable partial dentures (RPD). The outcomes of the treatment group (all-ceramic crowns) will be compared to a similarly-treated control group whose RPD abutment teeth are restored using conventional metal and metal-ceramic crowns. Primary outcomes of interest include crown survival, abutment tooth survival and RPD survival.The null hypothesis is that at the conclusion of the study there will be no differences in outcomes between the two groups. All dental treatment, including dental hygiene and periodontal care, fillings, crowns and RPD fabrication will be provided by predoctoral dental students in the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry student clinics. Students treating the subjects will be supervised by licensed, technique-calibrated faculty specialists. Following the completion of dental treatment, enrolled subjects will be clinically re-evaluated by investigators at 6 months, and at annual intervals thereafter for 5 years following RPD delivery.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 13, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2017

Results QC Date

March 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Need to Replace Crown on RPD Abutment Tooth

    This is a collective measure reporting need to replace an abutment tooth crown for any reason. This includes repeated adhesive failure at crown interface due to inadequate retention/resistance form in the abutment tooth preparation, catastrophic fracture of monolithic or veneering crown ceramic necessitating crown replacement, primary or secondary caries involving crowned abutment tooth necessitating crown replacement

    60 months

  • RPD Abutment Tooth Loss

    Loss of any RPD abutment tooth for any reason whether crowned or otherwise.

    60 months

  • RPD Failure

    Any technical or biologic complication resulting in loss of service of RPD. This includes loss of RPD as well as dissatisfaction and nonacceptance

    60 months

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Tooth Loss

    60 months

  • Caries

    60 months

  • Periodontal Disease

    60 months

  • Periodontal Disease

    60 months

  • Periodontal Disease

    60 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns

EXPERIMENTAL

If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from multi-layered monolithic zirconia

Device: Full-contour monolithic zirconia abutment crowns

Conventional abutment crowns

OTHER

If participants assigned to this arm are in need of surveyed crowns on RPD abutment teeth they will be fabricated from type III gold or high-noble metal veneered with feldspathic porcelain

Device: Conventional abutment crowns

Interventions

Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from monolithic multi-layered zirconia

Full-contour monolithic Zirconia crowns

Subjects with RPD abutment teeth that require surveyed crowns will have them fabricated from noble or high noble metals, veneered with feldspathic porcelain

Conventional abutment crowns

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Partially edentulous and treatment planned for an RPD
  • Requires at least 1 surveyed crown on an abutment tooth
  • Abutment teeth and RPD in function with opposing arch
  • Abutment teeth vital at time of study enrollment
  • English literacy, cognitively capable of understanding study and consent documents
  • Cognitively and functionally capable of performing prosthesis and oral self-care

You may not qualify if:

  • Any chronic or degenerative condition which impairs consent capability
  • Any cognitive or motor condition which impairs ability to follow instructions or perform oral self-care
  • Healthy enough to tolerate planned dental procedures without premedication
  • Chronic infectious disease
  • COPD
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Autoimmune or chronic inflammatory disorders
  • Unstable asthma or diabetes
  • Unstable hypertension

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Kentucky College of Dentistry

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0297, United States

Location

Related Publications (37)

  • Douglass CW, Watson AJ. Future needs for fixed and removable partial dentures in the United States. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.121204.

    PMID: 11807477BACKGROUND
  • Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: The clinical need for innovation. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Sep;118(3):273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

    PMID: 28343666BACKGROUND
  • Abt E, Carr AB, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003814.pub2.

    PMID: 22336794BACKGROUND
  • Benso B, Kovalik AC, Jorge JH, Campanha NH. Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013 Nov;71(6):1351-5. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.777780. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

    PMID: 23834529BACKGROUND
  • Ettinger RL, Goettsche ZS, Qian F. The Extent and Scope of Prosthodontic Practice in Iowa. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):113-121. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

    PMID: 28273692BACKGROUND
  • Rehmann P, Orbach K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures: a retrospective analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):147-50. doi: 10.11607/ijp.2959.

    PMID: 23476909BACKGROUND
  • De Kok IJ, Cooper LF, Guckes AD, McGraw K, Wright RF, Barrero CJ, Bak SY, Stoner LO. Factors Influencing Removable Partial Denture Patient-Reported Outcomes of Quality of Life and Satisfaction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan;26(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12526. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

    PMID: 27598416BACKGROUND
  • Murai S, Matsuda K, Ikebe K, Enoki K, Hatta K, Fujiwara K, Maeda Y. A field survey of the partially edentate elderly: Investigation of factors related to the usage rate of removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):828-32. doi: 10.1111/joor.12318. Epub 2015 Jun 7.

    PMID: 26059645BACKGROUND
  • Koyama S, Sasaki K, Yokoyama M, Sasaki T, Hanawa S. Evaluation of factors affecting the continuing use and patient satisfaction with Removable Partial Dentures over 5 years. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.11.007. Epub 2010 Jan 18.

    PMID: 20083450BACKGROUND
  • Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015.

    PMID: 15583562BACKGROUND
  • Donovan TE. Factors essential for successful all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:14S-18S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0360.

    PMID: 18768904BACKGROUND
  • Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18768902BACKGROUND
  • Spear F, Holloway J. Which all-ceramic system is optimal for anterior esthetics? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:19S-24S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0358.

    PMID: 18768905BACKGROUND
  • Sailer I, Makarov NA, Thoma DS, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015 Jun;31(6):603-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

    PMID: 25842099BACKGROUND
  • Larsson C, Wennerberg A. The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-43. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3647.

    PMID: 24392475BACKGROUND
  • Le M, Papia E, Larsson C. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jun;42(6):467-80. doi: 10.1111/joor.12272. Epub 2015 Jan 10.

    PMID: 25580846BACKGROUND
  • Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont. 2010 Jan;19(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00513.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.

    PMID: 19754642BACKGROUND
  • Ozer F, Mante FK, Chiche G, Saleh N, Takeichi T, Blatz MB. A retrospective survey on long-term survival of posterior zirconia and porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns in private practice. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):31-8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30768.

    PMID: 24392493BACKGROUND
  • Burns DR, Unger JW. The construction of crowns for removable partial denture abutment teeth. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jul;25(7):471-5.

    PMID: 7991768BACKGROUND
  • Kancyper S, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. All-ceramic surveyed crowns for removable partial denture abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Oct;84(4):400-2. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110253.

    PMID: 11044845BACKGROUND
  • Carracho JF, Razzoog ME. Removable partial denture abutments restored with all-ceramic surveyed crowns. Quintessence Int. 2006 Apr;37(4):283-8.

    PMID: 16594359BACKGROUND
  • Yoon TH, Chang WG. The fabrication of a CAD/CAM ceramic crown to fit an existing partial removable dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Sep;108(3):143-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60137-1.

    PMID: 22944309BACKGROUND
  • Pihlaja J, Napankangas R, Kuoppala R, Raustia A. Veneered zirconia crowns as abutment teeth for partial removable dental prostheses: a clinical 4-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

    PMID: 26346419BACKGROUND
  • Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res. 2014 Dec;93(12):1235-42. doi: 10.1177/0022034514553627. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

    PMID: 25274751BACKGROUND
  • Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-53. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.822098. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

    PMID: 23865549BACKGROUND
  • Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):314-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

    PMID: 24447258BACKGROUND
  • Flinn BD, Raigrodski AJ, Mancl LA, Toivola R, Kuykendall T. Influence of aging on flexural strength of translucent zirconia for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Sep 22.

    PMID: 27666494BACKGROUND
  • Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Lassila LV. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1180-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

    PMID: 26198027BACKGROUND
  • Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug;116(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

    PMID: 26994676BACKGROUND
  • Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Cooper LF, Walter R. Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: A dental laboratory survey. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):436-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 May 11.

    PMID: 27178771BACKGROUND
  • Belli R, Petschelt A, Hofner B, Hajto J, Scherrer SS, Lohbauer U. Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD/CAM All-ceramic Restorations. J Dent Res. 2016 Jan;95(1):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0022034515608187. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

    PMID: 26428908BACKGROUND
  • Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonca G. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

    PMID: 24980739BACKGROUND
  • Ueda K, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Kappert H, Beuer F. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):310-4. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-238. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

    PMID: 25904173BACKGROUND
  • Nordahl N, Vult von Steyern P, Larsson C. Fracture strength of ceramic monolithic crown systems of different thickness. J Oral Sci. 2015 Sep;57(3):255-61. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.57.255.

    PMID: 26369491BACKGROUND
  • Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lumkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(6):441-450. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a38157.

    PMID: 28497132BACKGROUND
  • Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11.

    PMID: 8193981BACKGROUND
  • Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x.

    PMID: 9332805BACKGROUND

Results Point of Contact

Title
Hiroko Nagaoka
Organization
University of Kentucky

Study Officials

  • Vaughan Hoefler, DDS, MBA

    University of Kentucky

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No masking
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes for partial edentulism using two restorative materials. A convenience sample of study participants will be randomly assigned to either a treatment group or a control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2017

First Posted

September 14, 2017

Study Start

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion

November 30, 2019

Study Completion

November 30, 2019

Last Updated

March 13, 2020

Results First Posted

March 13, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is not a plan to make IPD available

Locations