Evaluation of Fixation Achievable in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Implementing Latest-Generation Implant Technology
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective randomized control trial that aims to investigate fixation of implants after revision total knee replacement. The investigators are comparing long-stemmed revision implants with hybrid cementation to short-stemmed primary implants with augment using a special type of x-ray imaging (radiostereometric analysis) to assess implant movement over time. The investigators are also comparing costs and patient-reported outcomes between the groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Apr 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2022
CompletedApril 5, 2023
April 1, 2023
4.6 years
September 6, 2017
April 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant Migration Over Time
Tibial component migration over time measured through radiostereometric analysis
0-2 weeks (baseline exam) to 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Inducible displacement of the tibial component
Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Total costs
Surgery
KOOS Knee Survey
Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)
Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
Knee Society score
Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Long-Stemmed with Hybrid Fixation
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive the Long-Stemmed revision implant with Hybrid Fixation during their surgery.
Short-Stemmed with Augmented Fixation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive the Short-Stemmed primary implant with Augmented Fixation during their surgery.
Interventions
Long-stemmed revision implant with hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty
Short-stemmed primary implant with augmented fixation for total knee arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing a first total knee revision surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have previously undergone revision knee surgery
- Patients that require a hinged revision implant
- Patients that do not speak or understand English (questionnaires provided in English)
- Patients with any active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint
- Patients with bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis
- Patients that live \>100km from our centre (as such individuals are less likely to be available for the required follow-up appointments)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Related Publications (6)
Aggarwal VK, Goyal N, Deirmengian G, Rangavajulla A, Parvizi J, Austin MS. Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):536-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00131.
PMID: 24695919BACKGROUNDHeesterbeek PJ, Wymenga AB, van Hellemondt GG. No Difference in Implant Micromotion Between Hybrid Fixation and Fully Cemented Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Radiostereometric Analysis of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Bone Loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 17;98(16):1359-69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00909.
PMID: 27535438BACKGROUNDJensen CL, Petersen MM, Schroder HM, Flivik G, Lund B. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec;27(10):1820-1826.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
PMID: 22795879BACKGROUNDKosse NM, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Heesterbeek PJ. Comparable Stability of Cemented vs Press-Fit Placed Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Mild to Moderate Bone Loss: 6.5-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial With Radiostereometric Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
PMID: 27554783BACKGROUNDKurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00285.
PMID: 24740658BACKGROUNDStambough JB, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Keeney JA. Increased risk of failure following revision total knee replacement in patients aged 55 years and younger. Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1657-62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34486.
PMID: 25452369BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brent A Lanting, MD, FRCSC
London Health Sciences Centre
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients will be blinded so that they do not know what type of implant construct they received. It will not be possible to blind the surgeon or the individual performing the RSA image processing.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopaedic Surgeon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2017
First Posted
September 8, 2017
Study Start
April 20, 2018
Primary Completion
December 12, 2022
Study Completion
December 12, 2022
Last Updated
April 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04