NCT03276351

Brief Summary

This is a prospective randomized control trial that aims to investigate fixation of implants after revision total knee replacement. The investigators are comparing long-stemmed revision implants with hybrid cementation to short-stemmed primary implants with augment using a special type of x-ray imaging (radiostereometric analysis) to assess implant movement over time. The investigators are also comparing costs and patient-reported outcomes between the groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 6, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 8, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2018

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 12, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 5, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

September 6, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Implant Migration Over Time

    Tibial component migration over time measured through radiostereometric analysis

    0-2 weeks (baseline exam) to 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Inducible displacement of the tibial component

    Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

  • Total costs

    Surgery

  • KOOS Knee Survey

    Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

  • The Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)

    Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

  • Knee Society score

    Pre-operatively, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Long-Stemmed with Hybrid Fixation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive the Long-Stemmed revision implant with Hybrid Fixation during their surgery.

Device: Long-Stemmed with Hybrid Fixation

Short-Stemmed with Augmented Fixation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive the Short-Stemmed primary implant with Augmented Fixation during their surgery.

Device: Short-Stemmed with Augmented Fixation

Interventions

Long-stemmed revision implant with hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty

Long-Stemmed with Hybrid Fixation

Short-stemmed primary implant with augmented fixation for total knee arthroplasty

Short-Stemmed with Augmented Fixation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing a first total knee revision surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have previously undergone revision knee surgery
  • Patients that require a hinged revision implant
  • Patients that do not speak or understand English (questionnaires provided in English)
  • Patients with any active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint
  • Patients with bone stock compromised by disease, infection or prior implantation which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis
  • Patients that live \>100km from our centre (as such individuals are less likely to be available for the required follow-up appointments)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Aggarwal VK, Goyal N, Deirmengian G, Rangavajulla A, Parvizi J, Austin MS. Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):536-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00131.

    PMID: 24695919BACKGROUND
  • Heesterbeek PJ, Wymenga AB, van Hellemondt GG. No Difference in Implant Micromotion Between Hybrid Fixation and Fully Cemented Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Radiostereometric Analysis of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Bone Loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 17;98(16):1359-69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00909.

    PMID: 27535438BACKGROUND
  • Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Schroder HM, Flivik G, Lund B. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec;27(10):1820-1826.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.036. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

    PMID: 22795879BACKGROUND
  • Kosse NM, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Heesterbeek PJ. Comparable Stability of Cemented vs Press-Fit Placed Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Mild to Moderate Bone Loss: 6.5-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial With Radiostereometric Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

    PMID: 27554783BACKGROUND
  • Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00285.

    PMID: 24740658BACKGROUND
  • Stambough JB, Clohisy JC, Barrack RL, Nunley RM, Keeney JA. Increased risk of failure following revision total knee replacement in patients aged 55 years and younger. Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1657-62. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34486.

    PMID: 25452369BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Brent A Lanting, MD, FRCSC

    London Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Patients will be blinded so that they do not know what type of implant construct they received. It will not be possible to blind the surgeon or the individual performing the RSA image processing.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized to one of the two groups by block randomization using concealed envelopes, with the randomization and group assignment performed by a study coordinator at the time of surgery.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Orthopaedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2017

First Posted

September 8, 2017

Study Start

April 20, 2018

Primary Completion

December 12, 2022

Study Completion

December 12, 2022

Last Updated

April 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations