Trial Comparing Alignment Techniques - RSA of ATTUNE Knee System
Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) of the ATTUNE Knee System: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Anatomic (Femur First) to Neutral Mechanical Alignment Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
52
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare migration patterns between mechanical and anatomic alignment surgical techniques for the Attune S+ CR-FB knee system using model-based RSA over the first 2 post-operative years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started May 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2022
CompletedDecember 4, 2025
December 1, 2025
2.7 years
July 17, 2019
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant migration
Measured via radiosteriometric analysis (RSA)
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Oxford-12 knee score
Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Pre-operative, 12 months
European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Pre-operative Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP)
Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
7. University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Level scale
Pre-operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Neutral Mechanical Alignment
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal knee arthroplasty: Neutral Mechanical Alignment vs Anatomical Alignment
Anatomical Alignment
ACTIVE COMPARATORTotal knee arthroplasty: Neutral Mechanical Alignment vs Anatomical Alignment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee indicating primary total knee arthroplasty
- Varus knee deformity of 0 to 10 degrees
- Sufficient ligamentous function to warrant retention of the posterior cruciate ligament
- Between the ages of 21 and 80 inclusive
- Patients willing and able to comply with follow-up requirements and self-evaluations
- Ability to give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Active or prior infection
- Medical condition precluding major surgery
- Inflammatory arthropathy
- Prior patellectomy
- PCL deficiency
- Major Coronal plane deformity
- Valgus alignment
- Bone defects requiring augments, cones and/or stemmed implants
- Body Mass Index 45 or more
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Concordia Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2K 3S8, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Turgeon
Concordia Joint Replacement Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The patient will not be informed of their study allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2019
First Posted
September 6, 2019
Study Start
May 5, 2019
Primary Completion
February 1, 2022
Study Completion
February 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12