Simulation-based Low-dose High Frequency (LDHF) Plus Mobile Mentoring (m-Mentoring) Study in Nigeria
LDHF-Nigeria
A Comparative Study of Simulation-based Low-dose High Frequency (LDHF) Plus Mobile Mentoring (m-Mentoring) Versus Traditional Group-based Training Approaches Among Maternal and Newborn Healthcare Providers in Ebonyi and Kogi States, Nigeria
1 other identifier
interventional
299
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost of a simulation-based low dose high frequency (LDHF) plus m-Mentoring training versus the traditional group-based training approaches in improving knowledge and skill in maternal and newborn care and to determine trainees' satisfaction with the approaches in Ebonyi and Kogi states. The specific objectives are to:
- 1.Compare knowledge and skill learning outcomes between the two groups of birth attendants trained through the simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring versus group-based training approaches in Kogi and Ebonyi states over 12-months.
- 2.Assess the trainees' satisfaction with a simulation-based LDHF/m-Mentoring and group-based training approaches in improving skills of birth attendants in the selected facilities in Kogi and Ebonyi state over 12-months.
- 3.Determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of LDHF/m-Mentoring and group-based training approaches in improving skills of birth attendants in the selected facilities in Kogi and Ebonyi state over 12-months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 29, 2017
CompletedAugust 10, 2018
August 1, 2018
6 months
August 24, 2017
August 8, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent change in competency in basic obstetric and emergency care between the groups
Proportion of competent providers who retain clinical competency skills 3 months post-training
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of retention of skills between the two study arms
12 months
Level of satisfaction of service providers
12 months
Comparison of cost-effectiveness of the two approaches
12 months
Study Arms (2)
LDHF plus m-Mentoring
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will undergo pre-training assessment comprising multiple-choice questions and objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) using manikins. Training is divided into two 4-day "low-dose" sessions at the health facility or onsite training. Pre-training and immediate post-training assessments results will be compared. A score of ≥80% is acceptable competence (pass). During the one-month intervals between training sessions, participants practice using manikins to reinforce their competencies through simulation-based practices, facilitated by facility-based trained Peer Practice Coordinators (PPCs). The PPCs will also receive structured, monthly half-hour mentoring calls that will provide remote support, answering questions, providing guidance and reinforcing key messages. Acquisition of knowledge and clinical skills is measured.
Traditional training
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe health providers will receive the same content of training in eight days, Off-site training, the way it's currently done in Nigeria. Both theoretical and practical through use of manikins - simulation. No reinforcement and further practice will take place once the participants are back in their work stations. Acquisition of knowledge and clinical skills is measured.
Interventions
LDHF is a novel training approach that is being compared to the traditional training approach
Participants from different health facilities are gathered together in a central location for training, away from their workplaces
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must give informed consent to participate in the study;
- Must have spent at least six months in maternal and/or newborn care services;
- Must be providing services related to maternal and newborn health in selected health facilities at the time of the interview;
- Must be available to participate in the training from the beginning to the end; and
- Must have had pre-service training not incorporating simulation-based LDHF approach from accredited medical schools, schools of nursing/midwifery or health technology.
You may not qualify if:
- Decides to opt out / declines to participate.
- Has had prior training using the simulation-based LDHF approach.
- Provides services related to maternal and newborn health more than one health facility selected as part of intervention or comparison group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jhpiegolead
Related Publications (2)
Ugwa E, Kabue M, Otolorin E, Yenokyan G, Oniyire A, Orji B, Okoli U, Enne J, Alobo G, Olisaekee G, Oluwatobi A, Oduenyi C, Aledare A, Onwe B, Ishola G. Simulation-based low-dose, high-frequency plus mobile mentoring versus traditional group-based trainings among health workers on day of birth care in Nigeria; a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05450-9.
PMID: 32590979DERIVEDUgwa E, Otolorin E, Kabue M, Ishola G, Evans C, Oniyire A, Olisaekee G, Onwe B, LeFevre AE, Bluestone J, Orji B, Yenokyan G, Okoli U. Simulation-based low-dose, high-frequency plus mobile mentoring versus traditional group-based training approaches on day of birth care among maternal and newborn healthcare providers in Ebonyi and Kogi States, Nigeria; a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3405-2.
PMID: 30103761DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Emmanuel Otolorin
Jhpiego
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The assessors will blinded with respect to which study arm the participants (health care workers) were assigned to.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2017
First Posted
August 31, 2017
Study Start
September 17, 2016
Primary Completion
March 24, 2017
Study Completion
November 29, 2017
Last Updated
August 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08