Surgeons' Satisfaction With Two Types of Tinted Chlorhexidine Applicators (Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%)
Comparative Study to Asses the Satisfaction With Tinted Chlorhexidine Applicators (Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%)
1 other identifier
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The development of surgical site infections (SSI) in clean-contaminated surgery is regarded as being preventable. Known to be effective in the prevention of surgical site infection are the adequate sterilization of the surgical instruments, asepsis during operation, antibiotic prophylaxis where indicated, and certainly the preparation of the skin at the incision site. During the last decades the use of alcoholic chlorhexidine has replaced povidone iodine for preoperative skin preparation. In order to improve the way alcoholic chlorhexidine is applied, pharmaceutical industry has developed new applicators. This randomized study was conducted to know the surgeons' satisfaction within the use of two tinted applicators: Chloraprep® and Nex Clorex 2%
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2018
April 1, 2018
2 months
April 5, 2018
April 24, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Surgeon's global satisfaction with the applicators.
Using an analog visual scale we will record the total score, over a maximum of 80 points, that assess the following quality aspects of the applicators: * Satisfaction with the presentation of the product * Satisfaction with the simplicity of activation * Satisfaction with the mix of the different components of the product * Satisfaction with the comfort of product use * Satisfaction with the surface covered by an applicator * Satisfaction with the shape of the applicator for painting areas of difficult access * Satisfaction with the drying time of the product * Satisfaction with the area delimited with the use of the product
Intraoperative
Qualities of each applicators
Using an analog visual scale, were one end represents "totally disagree" and the other "totally agree" (0-10 points), we will record the score of each of the following quality aspects of the applicators: * Satisfaction with the presentation of the product * Satisfaction with the simplicity of activation * Satisfaction with the mix of the different components of the product * Satisfaction with the comfort of product use * Satisfaction with the surface covered by an applicator * Satisfaction with the shape of the applicator for painting areas of difficult access * Satisfaction with the drying time of the product * Satisfaction with the area delimited with the use of the product
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Costs of using the applicators
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Adhesion to preoperative measures to avoid surgical site infections (SSI)
Through study completion, an average of 3 months
Surgical site infection incidence
During the first 30 to 90 days after surgery, according to the SSI prevention protocol
Study Arms (4)
Knee surgeons
ACTIVE COMPARATORFour knee surgeons
Hip surgeons
ACTIVE COMPARATORSix hip surgeons
Cardiac surgeons
ACTIVE COMPARATOR6 cardiac surgeons
Colon surgeons
ACTIVE COMPARATOR6 colon surgeons
Interventions
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
We randomized knee, hip, cardiac and colon surgeons making them using two applicators of each brand in four of theirs surgeries. Randomization will be carried out in blocks of four for each surgeon.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteer surgeons from colon, cardiac, knee and hip surgical departments. Once surgeon has enrolled the study, patients will be selected if they have hospital admission with scheduled surgery and have signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Urgent surgeries
- Outpatient surgery
- Surgical complex cures
- Mixed interventions: exploratory or sequential
- Unscheduled surgeries
- Rejection of participation
- Chlorhexidine or isopropyl alcohol hypersensibility patients
- If any patients changed its mind after signing the informed consent will be removed from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Preventive and Public Health Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2018
First Posted
April 25, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04