Emulsion Versus Suspension in Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ethiodized Oil-based Transarterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Aqueous Cisplatin Emulsion Versus Anhydrous Cisplatin Suspension
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using the new formulation (Lipiodol-cisplatin suspension) for TACE in the treatment of HCC as compared to the conventional formulation (Lipiodol-cisplatin emulsion). This is a prospective, parallel-group, open-label randomized, phase III study that is conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and international standards of Good Clinical Practice, and approved by the institutional review board. Eligible patients were randomized into either a treatment arm of Lipiodol-cisplatin suspension or a control arm of Lipiodol-cisplatin emulsion with a 1:1 ratio.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 28, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2024
CompletedNovember 15, 2024
March 1, 2024
6.5 years
August 29, 2017
September 20, 2023
September 12, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Paticipants With Complete Tumor Response After the First 3 Treatments
Complete tumor response is defined according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria as well as DSA findings during the second and third treatment, it is defined as the absence of enhancing tumor on CT and/ or absence of residual tumor on selective DSA of the feeding arteries to the tumors and absence of enhancing tumor on the subsequent CT.
Within 6 months after randomization
Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events of All Treatment Procedures Occurring Within 30 Days of the Treatment
Severe adverse events is defined as any undesirable symptom, sign or medical condition which was fatal or life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was medically significant, might jeopardize the patient and might require medical or surgical intervention.
within 30 days of the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Number of Paticipants With Complete Tumour Response After the First Treatment
At 3 months after the first treatment
Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Tumour Response at 6 Months
At 6 months after the first treatment
Number of Participants With Intralesional Tumour Progression From Randomization Date up to 78 Months
throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months
Number of Participants With Extralesional Tumour Progression From Randomization Date up to 78 Months
throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months
Number of Participants With Extrahepatic Tumour Progression up to 78 Months
throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Suspension Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients are treated with chemoembolization using a formulation that consists of a suspension of 100mg pure anhydrous cisplatin in 20mL Lipiodol (5mg cisplatin /mL suspension)
Emulsion Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients are treated with chemoembolization using a formulation that consists of 10mg aqueous cisplatin (10mL) mixed with 10mL Lipiodol to form an emulsion (0.5mg cisplatin/mL emulsion)
Interventions
Arterial catheterization to segmental, subsegmental, or sub-subsegmental level was achieved depending on the tumor size, to gain arterial access as close to the tumors as possible. The formulation was delivered under fluoroscopic control until the vasculature of all tumors was entirely filled, or until the maximum dose was reached.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Age above 18 years
- HCC unsuitable for resection or ablation
- Child-Pugh A cirrhosis
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0 or 1
- BCLC A or B
- No previous treatment for HCC except for liver resection
- HCC diagnosed by typical enhancement patterns on cross sectional imaging or histology.
- No extra-hepatic involvement on non-enhanced CT thorax and triphasic contrast enhanced CT abdomen.
- No invasion of portal vein or hepatic vein
- Massive expansive tumor morphology with measurable lesion on CT (characterized by well-defined spherical or globular configuration, with or without tumor capsule or satellite lesions)
- Total tumor mass \< 50% liver volume
- Size of any individual tumor greater than or equal to 10cm in largest dimension
- Serum creatinine \< 130 umol/L or Creatinine clearance \> 55 ml/min.
You may not qualify if:
- Known active malignancy within the last 3 years
- History of acute tumor rupture presenting with hemo-peritoneum
- Biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous or endoscopic drainage
- History of hepatic encephalopathy
- Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy
- History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months
- Infiltrative tumor morphology (characterized by ill- defined tumor margin and amorphous configuration) or diffuse tumor morphology (characterized by large number of small nodules)
- Un-correctable Arterio-portal venous shunt affecting \>1 hepatic segment on CT
- Arterial-hepatic venous shunt with hepatic vein opacified in arterial phase on CT
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Yu SCH, Chan L, Lee KF, Cho CCM, Hui EP, Chu CCM, Cheung SYS, Lok HT, Li L, Wong JKT, Wong JC, Yuen TY, Yu PSM, Wong SSM, Wong HL, Ho CHCH, Mo F, Yeo WMM. Ethiodized Oil-based Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Clinical Trial of Anhydrous Cisplatin Suspension versus Cisplatin Emulsion. Radiology. 2025 Nov;317(2):e242982. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242982.
PMID: 41288481DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The number of subjects was relatively small, although the power of study was 85%. Using CT in assessing tumor response in the presence of intratumoral ethiodized oil may suffer a higher risk of missing minute tumors hidden among the ethiodized oil cast and over-diagnosing complete tumor response, however, the study outcomes were unlikely significantly affected, because viable tumors that were missed would have been captured at the study endpoint of intralesional tumor progression.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Simon Chun Ho Yu
- Organization
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon Yu
DIIR, CUHK, Hong Kong
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patients, doctors and other caretakers are not blinded to group allocation. Data collectors and analysts who assessed the study outcome and radiologists who assessed tumor response are blinded to group allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2017
First Posted
August 31, 2017
Study Start
September 9, 2016
Primary Completion
February 28, 2023
Study Completion
April 28, 2023
Last Updated
November 15, 2024
Results First Posted
November 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share