NCT03268499

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using the new formulation (Lipiodol-cisplatin suspension) for TACE in the treatment of HCC as compared to the conventional formulation (Lipiodol-cisplatin emulsion). This is a prospective, parallel-group, open-label randomized, phase III study that is conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and international standards of Good Clinical Practice, and approved by the institutional review board. Eligible patients were randomized into either a treatment arm of Lipiodol-cisplatin suspension or a control arm of Lipiodol-cisplatin emulsion with a 1:1 ratio.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 9, 2016

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2017

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 28, 2023

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 15, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6.5 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2017

Results QC Date

September 20, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Paticipants With Complete Tumor Response After the First 3 Treatments

    Complete tumor response is defined according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria as well as DSA findings during the second and third treatment, it is defined as the absence of enhancing tumor on CT and/ or absence of residual tumor on selective DSA of the feeding arteries to the tumors and absence of enhancing tumor on the subsequent CT.

    Within 6 months after randomization

  • Number of Participants With Severe Adverse Events of All Treatment Procedures Occurring Within 30 Days of the Treatment

    Severe adverse events is defined as any undesirable symptom, sign or medical condition which was fatal or life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was medically significant, might jeopardize the patient and might require medical or surgical intervention.

    within 30 days of the treatment

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Number of Paticipants With Complete Tumour Response After the First Treatment

    At 3 months after the first treatment

  • Number of Participants With Complete or Partial Tumour Response at 6 Months

    At 6 months after the first treatment

  • Number of Participants With Intralesional Tumour Progression From Randomization Date up to 78 Months

    throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months

  • Number of Participants With Extralesional Tumour Progression From Randomization Date up to 78 Months

    throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months

  • Number of Participants With Extrahepatic Tumour Progression up to 78 Months

    throughout follow-up period, up to 78 months

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Suspension Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients are treated with chemoembolization using a formulation that consists of a suspension of 100mg pure anhydrous cisplatin in 20mL Lipiodol (5mg cisplatin /mL suspension)

Procedure: Lipiodol-based transarterial chemoembolization

Emulsion Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients are treated with chemoembolization using a formulation that consists of 10mg aqueous cisplatin (10mL) mixed with 10mL Lipiodol to form an emulsion (0.5mg cisplatin/mL emulsion)

Procedure: Lipiodol-based transarterial chemoembolization

Interventions

Arterial catheterization to segmental, subsegmental, or sub-subsegmental level was achieved depending on the tumor size, to gain arterial access as close to the tumors as possible. The formulation was delivered under fluoroscopic control until the vasculature of all tumors was entirely filled, or until the maximum dose was reached.

Also known as: Conventional chemoembolization, cTACE
Emulsion GroupSuspension Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Written informed consent
  • Age above 18 years
  • HCC unsuitable for resection or ablation
  • Child-Pugh A cirrhosis
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score 0 or 1
  • BCLC A or B
  • No previous treatment for HCC except for liver resection
  • HCC diagnosed by typical enhancement patterns on cross sectional imaging or histology.
  • No extra-hepatic involvement on non-enhanced CT thorax and triphasic contrast enhanced CT abdomen.
  • No invasion of portal vein or hepatic vein
  • Massive expansive tumor morphology with measurable lesion on CT (characterized by well-defined spherical or globular configuration, with or without tumor capsule or satellite lesions)
  • Total tumor mass \< 50% liver volume
  • Size of any individual tumor greater than or equal to 10cm in largest dimension
  • Serum creatinine \< 130 umol/L or Creatinine clearance \> 55 ml/min.

You may not qualify if:

  • Known active malignancy within the last 3 years
  • History of acute tumor rupture presenting with hemo-peritoneum
  • Biliary obstruction not amenable to percutaneous or endoscopic drainage
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy
  • Intractable ascites not controllable by medical therapy
  • History of variceal bleeding within last 3 months
  • Infiltrative tumor morphology (characterized by ill- defined tumor margin and amorphous configuration) or diffuse tumor morphology (characterized by large number of small nodules)
  • Un-correctable Arterio-portal venous shunt affecting \>1 hepatic segment on CT
  • Arterial-hepatic venous shunt with hepatic vein opacified in arterial phase on CT

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Yu SCH, Chan L, Lee KF, Cho CCM, Hui EP, Chu CCM, Cheung SYS, Lok HT, Li L, Wong JKT, Wong JC, Yuen TY, Yu PSM, Wong SSM, Wong HL, Ho CHCH, Mo F, Yeo WMM. Ethiodized Oil-based Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Clinical Trial of Anhydrous Cisplatin Suspension versus Cisplatin Emulsion. Radiology. 2025 Nov;317(2):e242982. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242982.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

The number of subjects was relatively small, although the power of study was 85%. Using CT in assessing tumor response in the presence of intratumoral ethiodized oil may suffer a higher risk of missing minute tumors hidden among the ethiodized oil cast and over-diagnosing complete tumor response, however, the study outcomes were unlikely significantly affected, because viable tumors that were missed would have been captured at the study endpoint of intralesional tumor progression.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Simon Chun Ho Yu
Organization
The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study Officials

  • Simon Yu

    DIIR, CUHK, Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patients, doctors and other caretakers are not blinded to group allocation. Data collectors and analysts who assessed the study outcome and radiologists who assessed tumor response are blinded to group allocation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, multi-center, parallel-group, open-label, phase III randomized control trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2017

First Posted

August 31, 2017

Study Start

September 9, 2016

Primary Completion

February 28, 2023

Study Completion

April 28, 2023

Last Updated

November 15, 2024

Results First Posted

November 15, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations