High Resolution PET-MRI Before Prostate Cancer HIFU
High-Resolution, 18F-fluciclovine PET-MRI for Mapping Prostate Cancer in Patients Considering Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective trial aims to determine if enhanced prostate imaging using two novel imaging technologies (high resolution DWI and 18F-fluciclovine PET-MRI) will detect prostate cancers not seen on standard multiparametric prostate MRI in patients considered candidates for focal HIFU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2 prostate-cancer
Started Dec 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 8, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 8, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 21, 2021
CompletedFebruary 21, 2021
February 1, 2021
2.1 years
August 22, 2017
December 17, 2020
February 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Biopsy-proven Cancers (Gleason 6+) That Standard Imaging (mpMRI) Would Have Missed Compared With High Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) PET-hrMRI on Mapping MRI.
A Gleason score of 6 is low grade, 7 is intermediate grade, and a score of 8 to 10 is high grade cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is used to report how likely it is that a suspicious area is a clinically significant cancer. PI-RADS scores range from 1 (most likely not cancer) to 5 (very suspicious). Difference between sensitivities to identify prostate lesions. This is analyzed by the number of biopsy-proven cancerous zones (Gleason 6+) that mpMRI missed compared to PET or hrMRI (PIRADS) compared as follows: mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+)
At time of post-imaging biopsy
Number of Biopsy-proven Cancers (Gleason 7+) That Standard Imaging (mpMRI) Would Have Missed Compared With High Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) PET-hrMRI on Mapping MRI.
A Gleason score of 6 is low grade, 7 is intermediate grade, and a score of 8 to 10 is high grade cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is used to report how likely it is that a suspicious area is a clinically significant cancer. PI-RADS scores range from 1 (most likely not cancer) to 5 (very suspicious). Difference between sensitivities to identify prostate lesions. This is analyzed by the number of biopsy-proven cancerous zones (Gleason 7+) that mpMRI missed compared to PET or hrMRI (PIRADS) compared as follows: mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+)
At time of post-imaging biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Negative Biopsy Rate (Number of Participants With Negative Biopsy)
6 months following standard HIFU therapy
Rate of High Grade Cancer (Number of Patients With High Grade Cancer)
6 months following standard HIFU therapy
Study Arms (1)
18F-Fluciclovine
EXPERIMENTAL10mCi +/-20% 18F-fluciclovine injection
Interventions
Imaging (comparing standard and experimental high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging \[DWI\] MRI with 18F-Fluciclovine)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prostate biopsy consisting of ≥ 10 tissue cores sampled
- PSA \</=20 ng/mL
- cT1-cT2c
- Either overall gleason score \>/= 7 with Gleason grade 4 or 5 component localized to one lobe (i.e. right or left) OR overall Gleason score 6 with \>/= half of systematic biopsy cores positive and \>/= 50% of core involvement in at least one core
- Patient considering focal HIFU therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Previous local therapy for prostate cancer
- Inability to receive PET tracer
- Inability to receive MRI
- Suggestion of extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion on imaging
- Estimated creatinine clearance \<45 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation)
- Any other condition which, in the investigator's option, may make the patient a poor candidate for participation in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Timothy J. Daskivichlead
- Blue Earth Diagnosticscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Timothy Daskivich, M.D.
- Organization
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy Daskivich, MD
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Staff Physician I, Division of Urology; Urologic Oncologist; Director, Health Services Research, Department of Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2017
First Posted
August 28, 2017
Study Start
December 7, 2017
Primary Completion
January 8, 2020
Study Completion
January 8, 2020
Last Updated
February 21, 2021
Results First Posted
February 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02