NCT03263780

Brief Summary

This prospective trial aims to determine if enhanced prostate imaging using two novel imaging technologies (high resolution DWI and 18F-fluciclovine PET-MRI) will detect prostate cancers not seen on standard multiparametric prostate MRI in patients considered candidates for focal HIFU.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 28, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 7, 2017

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 8, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 8, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 21, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

August 22, 2017

Results QC Date

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Diagnostic imagingHigh-Intensity Focused UltrasoundHIFU18F-Fluciclovinehigh resolution diffusion-weighted imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Biopsy-proven Cancers (Gleason 6+) That Standard Imaging (mpMRI) Would Have Missed Compared With High Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) PET-hrMRI on Mapping MRI.

    A Gleason score of 6 is low grade, 7 is intermediate grade, and a score of 8 to 10 is high grade cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is used to report how likely it is that a suspicious area is a clinically significant cancer. PI-RADS scores range from 1 (most likely not cancer) to 5 (very suspicious). Difference between sensitivities to identify prostate lesions. This is analyzed by the number of biopsy-proven cancerous zones (Gleason 6+) that mpMRI missed compared to PET or hrMRI (PIRADS) compared as follows: mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+)

    At time of post-imaging biopsy

  • Number of Biopsy-proven Cancers (Gleason 7+) That Standard Imaging (mpMRI) Would Have Missed Compared With High Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) PET-hrMRI on Mapping MRI.

    A Gleason score of 6 is low grade, 7 is intermediate grade, and a score of 8 to 10 is high grade cancer. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) is used to report how likely it is that a suspicious area is a clinically significant cancer. PI-RADS scores range from 1 (most likely not cancer) to 5 (very suspicious). Difference between sensitivities to identify prostate lesions. This is analyzed by the number of biopsy-proven cancerous zones (Gleason 7+) that mpMRI missed compared to PET or hrMRI (PIRADS) compared as follows: mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 7+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 3-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI and PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+) mpMRI vs hrMRI or PET (PIRADS 4-5 \& Gleason 6+)

    At time of post-imaging biopsy

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Negative Biopsy Rate (Number of Participants With Negative Biopsy)

    6 months following standard HIFU therapy

  • Rate of High Grade Cancer (Number of Patients With High Grade Cancer)

    6 months following standard HIFU therapy

Study Arms (1)

18F-Fluciclovine

EXPERIMENTAL

10mCi +/-20% 18F-fluciclovine injection

Drug: 18F-Fluciclovine

Interventions

Imaging (comparing standard and experimental high resolution diffusion-weighted imaging \[DWI\] MRI with 18F-Fluciclovine)

Also known as: Axumin, prostate-cancer-specific radiotracer
18F-Fluciclovine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prostate biopsy consisting of ≥ 10 tissue cores sampled
  • PSA \</=20 ng/mL
  • cT1-cT2c
  • Either overall gleason score \>/= 7 with Gleason grade 4 or 5 component localized to one lobe (i.e. right or left) OR overall Gleason score 6 with \>/= half of systematic biopsy cores positive and \>/= 50% of core involvement in at least one core
  • Patient considering focal HIFU therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous local therapy for prostate cancer
  • Inability to receive PET tracer
  • Inability to receive MRI
  • Suggestion of extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion on imaging
  • Estimated creatinine clearance \<45 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault equation)
  • Any other condition which, in the investigator's option, may make the patient a poor candidate for participation in a clinical trial.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

fluciclovine F-18

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Timothy Daskivich, M.D.
Organization
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Timothy Daskivich, MD

    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Staff Physician I, Division of Urology; Urologic Oncologist; Director, Health Services Research, Department of Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2017

First Posted

August 28, 2017

Study Start

December 7, 2017

Primary Completion

January 8, 2020

Study Completion

January 8, 2020

Last Updated

February 21, 2021

Results First Posted

February 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Locations