NCT02919111

Brief Summary

The investigators are imaging patients with prostate cancer using a new PET imaging agent (Ga-68-PSMA-11) in order to evaluate it's ability to detection prostate cancer in patients with high risk disease prior to prostatectomy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
299

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 23, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2016

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

December 10, 2020

Status Verified

November 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2016

Results QC Date

October 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 13, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy

    Sensitivity is defined as the ratio of the proportion of the patients who have the condition of interest and whose test results are positive over the number who have the disease. Patients who have a positive node on imaging and on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have no nodes on imaging and pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with positive nodes on imaging and negative on pathology will be considered false positives and those with positive nodes on pathology but negative on imaging will be considered false negatives. Follow-up scans for up to one year can be used in analysis

    Up to 1 year

  • Specificity of of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy

    Specificity is defined as the number of non-diseased participants correctly classified divided by all non-diseased individuals. Patients who have a positive node on imaging and on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have no nodes on imaging and pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with positive nodes on imaging and negative on pathology will be considered false positives and those with positive nodes on pathology but negative on imaging will be considered false negatives. Follow-up scans for up to one year can be used in analysis

    Up to 1 year

  • Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy

    PPV is the proportion of patients with positive test who actually have the disease. Patients who have a positive node on imaging and on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have no nodes on imaging and pathology will be considered true-negatives. Patients with positive nodes on imaging and negative on pathology will be considered false positives and those with positive nodes on pathology but negative on imaging will be considered false negatives. Follow-up scans for up to one year can be used in analysis

    Up to 1 year

  • Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy

    NPV is the ratio of participants truly diagnosed as negative to all those who had negative test results. Patients who have a positive node on imaging and on pathology will be considered a true-positive. Patients who have no nodes on imaging and pathology will be considered true- negatives. Patients with positive nodes on imaging and negative on pathology will be considered false positives and those with positive nodes on pathology but negative on imaging will be considered false negatives. Follow-up scans for obtained up to one year after study scan be used in analysis.

    Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Number of Participants With Grade 3 Treatment-related Adverse Events

    Up to 3 days

  • Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases

    Up to 1 year

  • Specificity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases

    Up to 1 year

  • Positive Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases

    Up to 1 year

  • Negative Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases

    Up to 1 year

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Ga-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET

EXPERIMENTAL

PSMA PET imaging: Patients will receive Ga-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET and then undergo PET/CT or PET/MRI approximately 55-70 minutes later.

Drug: Ga-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET

Interventions

Patients will be imaged using Ga-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET to determine if the presence of metastatic disease. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is a protein expressed on prostate cancer cells that can be imaged using small molecules that target this protocol.

Also known as: Ga-68 labeled DKFZ-PSMA-11, Ga-68 labeled Glu-NH-CO-NH- Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC, Ga-68 labeled Glu-urea- Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC, Ga-68 labeled HBED-CC PSMA
Ga-68 labeled PSMA-11 PET

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • Planned prostatectomy with lymph node dissection.
  • Intermediate to high-risk disease (as determined by elevated Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \[PSA\>10\], T-stage \[T2b or greater\], Gleason score \[Gleason score \> 6\] or other risk factors).
  • Diagnostic CT or MRI as part of the PET study or performed within one month of PSMA PET.
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater than 50 (or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) /World Health Organization (WHO) equivalent).
  • Age \> 18.
  • Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients not capable of getting PET study due to weight, claustrophobia, or inability to lay still for the duration of the exam.
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy prior to prostatectomy.
  • Including focal ablation techniques (HiFu).
  • Androgen deprivation therapy or other neoadjuvant treatments prior to PET imaging and surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94107, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Djaileb L, Armstrong WR, Thompson D, Gafita A, Farolfi A, Rajagopal A, Grogan TR, Nguyen K, Benz MR, Hotta M, Barbato F, Ceci F, Schwarzenbock SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Juarez R, Cooperberg M, Carroll P, Washington S, Reiter RE, Eiber M, Herrmann K, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Hope TA, Calais J. Presurgical 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence Risk Assessment: A Follow-up Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. Eur Urol. 2023 Dec;84(6):588-596. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

  • Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenbock SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;7(11):1635-1642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3771.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

gallium 68 PSMA-11

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Thomas Hope, MD
Organization
University of California, San Francisco

Study Officials

  • Thomas Hope, MD

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2016

First Posted

September 29, 2016

Study Start

September 23, 2016

Primary Completion

December 31, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

December 10, 2020

Results First Posted

December 10, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations