Impact of the Use of Nandrolone on the Treatment of Malnutrition Induced by Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Compare the use of nandrolone associated with corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer-induced malnutrition to treatment with corticosteroids alone in patients with tumors in the high gastro-intestinal tract, liver, pancreas and bile ducts in palliative treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2017
CompletedFebruary 26, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.6 years
August 15, 2017
February 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Compare the use of nandrolone associated with corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer-induced malnutrition to treatment with corticosteroids alone in cancer patients
Evaluate the BMI ( body mass index)- the weight in kilograms and the height in centimeters and BMI in Kg/ m2.
After 30 days, the values will be compared to those obtained on the first consultant.
Compare the use of nandrolone associated with corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer-induced malnutrition to treatment with corticosteroids alone in cancer patients by bioimpedance analysis ( BIA)
Evaluate the BIA (biometrical impedance analysis)trough the reactance and resistance in ohms and the phase angle in degree.
After 30 days, the values will be compared to those obtained on the first consultant.
ompare the use of nandrolone associated with corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer-induced malnutrition to treatment with corticosteroids alone in cancer patients trough quality of life assessment
Evaluate quality of life by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnare Core 30 ( QLQ-C30), version 3.0 . The values are expressed as a percentage
After 30 days, the values will be compared to those obtained on the first consultant.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare data from laboratory tests: complete blood count, albumin, C reactive protein and transferrin with drug intervention.
After 30 days, the laboratory test will be collect again and the values will be compared to those obtained on the first consultant.
Study Arms (2)
Group 1: nandrolone and corticosteroid
EXPERIMENTALthe patient will receive an application of anabolic nandrolone decanoate at a dose of 50 mg (males) and 25 mg (females), intra-muscular form, in the first and fifteenth days. In addition to the anabolic steroid, the patient will use corticosteroids (dexamethasone) at home at a dose of 4 mg daily by mouth on the morning for both sexes for 30 days.
Group 2: corticosteroid
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will take corticosteroids ( 4 mg of dexamethasone) per oral, QD at morning for 30 days
Interventions
Drug administration
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Cancer patients above 18 years old.
- Patients with tumors in the high gastro-intestinal, hepatobiliary and pancreatic tracts in palliation.
- Patients able to undergo BIA.
- Malnourished patients as per the subjective global assessment produced by the patient (ASG-PPP) and whose score is greater than nine.
- Patients who agree to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with malignant tumors of other metachronous or synchronous location except nonmelanoma skin tumor
- Patients with chronic renal failure.
- Patients on diuretics, recent or chronic.
- Patients on appetite stimulants and anabolic agents.
- Patients using pacemakers, which can interfere with the results of BIA
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Erasto Gaertner
Curitiba, ParanĂ¡, 81520060, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vinicius B Preti, MD
Hospital Erasto Gaertner/ Liga Paranaense de Combate ao Cancer
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor and investigator does not have contact with the patient or care provider at the moment of randomization and the study purpose. The investigator just apply the bioelectrical impedance analysis and helps the patient about doubts on the Quality of Life questionnaire of EORTC ( QLQ-C30)
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2017
First Posted
August 28, 2017
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
August 30, 2017
Study Completion
October 31, 2017
Last Updated
February 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02