Feeding Tube Attachment Device Versus Conventional Fixation and Its Impact on Accidental Exit of Enteral Feeding Tubes
Use of Feeding Tube Attachment Device Versus Conventional Fixation and Its Impact on Accidental Exit of Enteral Feeding Tubes: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Enteral nutritional therapy, fed through the gastrointestinal tract via a catheter, tube, catheter, or stoma, delivers the nutrients distally to the oral cavity and may reduce intrahospital malnutrition. Enteral probes are inserted, at the bedside, through the nose or mouth into the stomach or duodenum. Among the main complications of the use enteral probes, we can mention: displacement of the probe and administration of diet in the respiratory tract or microaspirations. To prevent displacement, enteral probes are attached to the skin on the nose or forehead by the use of micropore-type adhesive. In the probe the adhesive tape is put in the form of "tie" and again fixed to the nose of the patient. The enteral probes displacement rates with this technique are around 62%; in addition, the adhesive tape can cause discomfort, nasal necrosis, skin lesions and skin sensitivity reactions to the patient. More recently the nasal bridle, an anchor of the enteral feeding tube located around the nasal septum or nasal septum, has been described as more effective in securing enteral probes position over traditional tape attachment, but is not available in our environment. In Brazil, the feeding tube attachment device (FTAD) is available. Until now, the performance of FTAD in relation to enteral probe safety and accidental exit rates has not been described in the literature. Material's FTAD is composed of a layer of hydrocolloid that is adhered to the skin on the back of the nose and a polyurethane clamp that secures the enteral probe. Thus, there was a need to evaluate the actual success in using the traditional mode of probe attachment. It should be noted that very little scientific evidence is available in the literature on such care, and this is due to the lack of well-designed studies on the subject.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2018
CompletedAugust 9, 2018
August 1, 2017
7 months
August 23, 2017
August 8, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of accidental enteral probes exit per patient
Will be accessed by the patient's chart
Thirty fifth day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reasons for the accidental enteral probes exit per patient and / or reintegration of enteral probes between the groups
Thirty fifth day
Administrated enteral nutrition volume per patient
Thirty fifth day
Time of fasting or delay in the use of enteral probes between groups
Thirty fifth day
Study Arms (2)
Interventional Group
EXPERIMENTALIt consists of the use of the feeding tube attachment device (FTAD) to fix the enteral probe.
Conventional Group
NO INTERVENTIONIt consists of the fixation of the enteral probe with adhesive tape of the micropore type and plaster.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults hospitalized in the clinic unit care: 6 sul e 7 norte
- Use of enteral nutrition in open system
You may not qualify if:
- Use of enteral nutrition by gastrostomy or jejunostomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Michelli Cristina Silva de Assis
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90690270, Brazil
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelli S de Assis, Doctorate
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2017
First Posted
August 25, 2017
Study Start
June 14, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
March 31, 2018
Last Updated
August 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-08