NCT03262467

Brief Summary

In patients with chronic renal failure, a well-functioning vascular access is essential for hemodialysis treatment. Native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the first-choice of vascular access, due to a lower incidence of complications and better long-term patency as compared to prosthetic arteriovenous fistula. With the incidence ranging between 6-60%, AVF aneurysm (AAVF) is a common complication of native AVF. According to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines, asymptomatic aneurysms are indicated for conservative treatment, but precise recommendations when and how to intervene in available guidelines are missing. Several surgical (remodeling, resection and substitution, ligation) and endovascular techniques have been described in the AAVF treatment, but there is currently no prospective randomized study comparing these techniques. In 2008, our team published the first experience with a new surgical method of AAVF treatment - aneurysmorrhaphy with external porous prosthesis (Provena©, BBraun). This therapy was validated in several studies and has shown a good long-term patency and a minimal incidence of complications. AAVF aneurysmorrhaphy can be performed with or without an external porous prosthesis (Provena©, BBraun). The use of external prostheses reduces venous wall shear stress, turbulent flow, endothelial damage, and thrombus formation, which should improve vascular patency and reduce the risk of AVF re-aneurysm. So far, there is no prospective randomized study comparing the effect of external porous prosthesis on AVF patency and the incidence of postoperative complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 23, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 25, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 31, 2018

Completed
5.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5.4 years

First QC Date

August 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patency and aneurysms recurrence at 12 months after operation

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Complications at 12 months

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Aneurysmorrhaphy with external porous prosthesis (Provena©)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: Aneurysmorrhaphy with or without external porous prosthesis (Provena©, BBraun)

Aneurysmorrhaphy without external porous prosthesis

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Procedure: Aneurysmorrhaphy with or without external porous prosthesis (Provena©, BBraun)

Interventions

In patients with aneurysm of native vascular access indicated for surgical treatment, aneurysmorrhaphy with or without external porous prosthesis (Provena©, BBraun) wil be performed.

Aneurysmorrhaphy with external porous prosthesis (Provena©)Aneurysmorrhaphy without external porous prosthesis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Signature of informed consent.
  • A male or female subject aged 18 or older.
  • A subject with a naive vascular access aneurysm indicated for surgical treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with pseudoaneurysm of prosthetic vascular access
  • Patients with a vascular access infection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University

Prague, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Huber TS, Carter JW, Carter RL, Seeger JM. Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Nov;38(5):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00426-9.

    PMID: 14603208BACKGROUND
  • Salahi H, Fazelzadeh A, Mehdizadeh A, Razmkon A, Malek-Hosseini SA. Complications of arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients. Transplant Proc. 2006 Jun;38(5):1261-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.02.066.

    PMID: 16797276BACKGROUND
  • Sidawy AN, Spergel LM, Besarab A, Allon M, Jennings WC, Padberg FT Jr, Murad MH, Montori VM, O'Hare AM, Calligaro KD, Macsata RA, Lumsden AB, Ascher E; Society for Vascular Surgery. The Society for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for the surgical placement and maintenance of arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5 Suppl):2S-25S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.042.

    PMID: 19000589BACKGROUND
  • Balaz P, Rokosny S, Klein D, Adamec M. Aneurysmorrhaphy is an easy technique for arteriovenous fistula salvage. J Vasc Access. 2008 Apr-Jun;9(2):81-4.

    PMID: 18609522BACKGROUND
  • Berard X, Brizzi V, Mayeux S, Sassoust G, Biscay D, Ducasse E, Bordenave L, Corpataux JM, Midy D. Salvage treatment for venous aneurysm complicating vascular access arteriovenous fistula: use of an exoprosthesis to reinforce the vein after aneurysmorrhaphy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;40(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.01.021. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

    PMID: 20202869BACKGROUND
  • Rokosny S, Balaz P, Wohlfahrt P, Palous D, Janousek L. Reinforced aneurysmorrhaphy for true aneurysmal haemodialysis vascular access. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;47(4):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

    PMID: 24530180BACKGROUND
  • Wohlfahrt P, Rokosny S, Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA, Pecenkova V, Balaz P. Cardiac remodeling after reduction of high-flow arteriovenous fistulas in end-stage renal disease. Hypertens Res. 2016 Sep;39(9):654-9. doi: 10.1038/hr.2016.50. Epub 2016 May 26.

    PMID: 27225601BACKGROUND
  • Barra JA, Volant A, Leroy JP, Braesco J, Airiau J, Boschat J, Blanc JJ, Penther P. Constrictive perivenous mesh prosthesis for preservation of vein integrity. Experimental results and application for coronary bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986 Sep;92(3 Pt 1):330-6.

    PMID: 3528676BACKGROUND
  • Meguro T, Nakashima H, Kawada S, Tokunaga K, Ohmoto T. Effect of external stenting and systemic hypertension on intimal hyperplasia in rat vein grafts. Neurosurgery. 2000 Apr;46(4):963-9; discussion 969-70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200004000-00036.

    PMID: 10764272BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2017

First Posted

August 25, 2017

Study Start

January 31, 2018

Primary Completion

July 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

February 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations