Correlation Between (PV-RQOL), The Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis of Voice in Dysphonic Children
Correlation Between The Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL), The Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis of Voice in Dysphonic Children
1 other identifier
observational
126
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the Correlation between The Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL), The Auditory Perceptual Assessment and Acoustic Analysis of voice of dysphonic children. This is important to provide an efficient therapeutic strategy for these children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2018
CompletedOctober 24, 2017
August 1, 2017
10 months
August 21, 2017
October 23, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All participants' scores of (PV-RQOL) questionnaire will be correlated with scores of auditory perceptual assessment and Acoustic voice analysis.
Application of the Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL): all participants /parents of the participants will be given (PV-RQOL) form that consists of 10 questions divided among 4 subdomains: The social (questions no: 8 and 10), emotional (questions no: 4 and 5) , The physical (questions no: 2 and 3) and the functional (questions no: 1, 6,7 and 9) . Thus the total score can range from 0 to 100 points with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.and Auditory perceptual assessment (APA) of the participant's voice: the domains will be graded on a scale of 0-3, in which 0 is normal and 3 is severe.and Acoustic voice analysis: will be carried out using Kay Elemetrics' Computerized Speech Laboratory. These measures will be obtained by recording the voice of each participant using a microphone positioned ∼10 cm from his/her mouth and the participantswill be asked to phonate a sustained vowel /a/ at comfortable pitch and intensity levels.
baseline
Study Arms (2)
study group sixty three children
1. severity and character of dysphonia APA using a modified GRBAS scale which gives scores as regard the degree and severity of dysphonia and its character. 2. Acoustic Analysis of voice : which is Computerized Speech Laboratory analysis of voice that gives the following measures jitter (%), shimmer (dB), and harmonic to noise ratio (H/N). 3. the degree of social ,emotional ,functional and physical disturbance ,if present in those children with voice disorders by application of The Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL).
control group sixty three children
1. severity and character of dysphonia (APA using a modified GRBAS scale which gives scores as regard the degree and severity of dysphonia and its character. 2. Acoustic Analysis of voice : which is Computerized Speech Laboratory analysis of voice that gives the following measures jitter (%), shimmer (dB), and harmonic to noise ratio (H/N). 3. the degree of social ,emotional ,functional and physical disturbance ,if present in those children with voice disorders by application of The Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL).
Interventions
1. severity and character of dysphonia (measured by Auditory Perceptual Assessment using a modified GRBAS scale which gives scores as regard the degree and severity of dysphonia and its character. 2. Acoustic Analysis of voice : which is Computerized Speech Laboratory analysis of voice that gives the following measures jitter (%), shimmer (dB), and harmonic to noise ratio (H/N). 3. the degree of social ,emotional ,functional and physical disturbance ,if present in those children with voice disorders by application of The Arabic Pediatric Voice Related Quality of Life (PV-RQOL).
Eligibility Criteria
One hundred twenty six (126) children will participate in the study; in 2 groups ,1-study group 63 children they have dysphonia due to functional (non-organic) causes or due to Minimal Associated Pathological Lesions (MAPLs),2-control group 63 children without vocal complaints They will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of Phoniatric Unit, Assiut University Hospital. Participants (whether their caretakers or themselves) will sign an informed consent of approval to participate in the study after explanation of the study procedures.
You may qualify if:
- clinical diagnosis of change of voice due to functional (non-organic) causes or due to Minimal Associated Pathological Lesions (MAPLs).
You may not qualify if:
- Mental Retardation.
- chronic illnesses affecting their quality of lives.
- organic voice disorders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
Lopes LW, Barbosa Lima IL, Alves Almeida LN, Cavalcante DP, de Almeida AA. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data. J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):819.e7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.05.008.
PMID: 23177753BACKGROUNDKotby MN, Shiromoto O, Hirano M. The accent method of voice therapy: effect of accentuations on FO, SPL, and airflow. J Voice. 1993 Dec;7(4):319-25. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80120-1.
PMID: 8293064BACKGROUNDCarding PN, Roulstone S, Northstone K; ALSPAC Study Team. The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study. J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):623-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
PMID: 16360302BACKGROUNDTrani M, Ghidini A, Bergamini G, Presutti L. Voice therapy in pediatric functional dysphonia: a prospective study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;71(3):379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
PMID: 17137639BACKGROUNDBlumin JH, Keppel KL, Braun NM, Kerschner JE, Merati AL. The impact of gender and age on voice related quality of life in children: normative data. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Feb;72(2):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.10.015. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
PMID: 18063123BACKGROUNDConnor NP, Cohen SB, Theis SM, Thibeault SL, Heatley DG, Bless DM. Attitudes of children with dysphonia. J Voice. 2008 Mar;22(2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.005. Epub 2007 May 18.
PMID: 17512168BACKGROUNDGliklich RE, Glovsky RM, Montgomery WW. Validation of a voice outcome survey for unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Feb;120(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70399-2.
PMID: 9949345BACKGROUNDHartnick CJ. Validation of a pediatric voice quality-of-life instrument: the pediatric voice outcome survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Aug;128(8):919-22. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.8.919.
PMID: 12162771BACKGROUNDBoseley ME, Cunningham MJ, Volk MS, Hartnick CJ. Validation of the Pediatric Voice-Related Quality-of-Life survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jul;132(7):717-20. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.7.717.
PMID: 16847178BACKGROUNDZur KB, Cotton S, Kelchner L, Baker S, Weinrich B, Lee L. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jan;71(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
PMID: 17046072BACKGROUNDVerduyckt I, Remacle M, Jamart J, Benderitter C, Morsomme D. Voice-related complaints in the pediatric population. J Voice. 2011 May;25(3):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.008. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
PMID: 20359863BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2017
First Posted
August 24, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
October 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08