Comprehensive Voice Rehabilitation Program Compared With Vocal Function Exercises
Voicetherapy
The Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Voice Rehabilitation Program Compared With Vocal Function Exercises Method in Behavioral Dysphonia: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
106
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Comprehensive Voice Rehabilitation Program compared with Vocal Function Exercises in behavioral dysphonia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Jan 2011
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2015
CompletedApril 7, 2015
April 1, 2015
11 months
March 19, 2015
April 6, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of the vocal quality (assessed by two self assessment questionnaires)
The improvement was assessed by two questionnaires of self assessment vocal quality: Voice Related Quality of life questionnaire (VRQOL) and Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in the three different moments: pre therapy, post therapy and one month after therapy
First assesment in the beggining of the treatment; 2nd assesment after 6 weeks of treatment; 3rd assesment a month after the end of treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Perceptual auditory analysis (assessed by 3 senior SLP)
First assesment in the beggining of the treatment; 2nd assesment after 6 weeks of treatment; 3rd assesment a month after the end of treatment.
Improvement of larynx (evaluation by blind assessor)
First assesment: in the beggining of the treatment; 2nd assesment: after 6 weeks of treatment; 3rd assesment: a month after the end of treatment.
Study Arms (2)
VFE voice therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORVoice therapy: Vocal Function Exercises applied during 6 weeks
CVRP voice therapy
EXPERIMENTALVoice therapy: Comprehensive Voice Rehabilitation Program applied during 6 weeks
Interventions
Voice therapy applied during 6 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- voice professionals with behavioral dysphonia, with or without larynx lesions, with otorhinolaryngologist's indication;
- over 6 months with vocal complain;
- or more signs and symptoms in the questionary.
You may not qualify if:
- Other kind of vocal disorder, speech or language disorder, malignant lesions, hormonal disturbances related by the patient, laryngeal papilloma, etc.
- Singers;
- neurological problems;
- acute larynx problem.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Ziegler A, Gillespie AI, Abbott KV. Behavioral treatment of voice disorders in teachers. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2010;62(1-2):9-23. doi: 10.1159/000239059. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
PMID: 20093840BACKGROUNDMacKenzie K, Millar A, Wilson JA, Sellars C, Deary IJ. Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):658-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.658.
PMID: 11566828RESULTNiebudek-Bogusz E, Sznurowska-Przygocka B, Fiszer M, Kotylo P, Sinkiewicz A, Modrzewska M, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. The effectiveness of voice therapy for teachers with dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(3):134-41. doi: 10.1159/000120290. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
PMID: 18334848RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Vanessa P Vieira, PhD
Federal University of São Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2015
First Posted
April 7, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04