Can we Train Patients With Chronic Stroke Out of Abnormal Hand Synergy?
Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Reduce Abnormal Hand Synergy
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study plans to determine whether training can change abnormal flexion synergy in chronic stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2020
CompletedNovember 8, 2021
November 1, 2021
3.8 years
May 18, 2017
November 1, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Individuation Index
The relationship between forces (in Newton) in active vs passive fingers during a set of isolated finger movements. It is a measure of finger independence.
Change from Baseline Individuation Index at 2 weeks
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Assesses upper limb functioning in activities of daily living using observational methods. It is a 19 item measure divided into a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from: 3: Performs test normally 2: Completes test, but takes abnormally long or has great difficulty 1: Performs test partially 0: Can perform no part of test. Possible score range of 0 to 57; higher scores equal less impairment.
Change from Baseline ARAT at 2 weeks
Fugl-Meyer (Motor Function - Upper Extremity Subscale)
Assesses functional mobility using observational methods. It is a 66 item measure. Its items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale. 0: Cannot perform 1. performs partially 2. performs fully Possible score range from 0 - 66
Change from Baseline Impairment Index at 2 weeks
Accuracy (Euclidian norm)
The deviation of each finger from a target amount of force generation during a set of finger movements.
Change from Baseline Accuracy at 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Execution Time
Change from Baseline Execution Time at 2 weeks
Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Examination (SWME)
Change from Baseline SWME at 2 weeks
Modified Ashworth scale
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Finger Dexterity Training
EXPERIMENTALChronic stroke patients (i.e. great than 6 months) with ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI, residual unilateral upper extremity weakness, able to give informed consent, and able to understand the tasks involved. Participants trained for 5 consecutive days, 3 to 4 h/d, on a multi-finger piano-chord-like task that cannot be performed by compensatory actions of other body parts (e.g., arm). Participants had to learn to simultaneously coordinate and synchronize multiple fingers to break unwanted flexor synergies.
Interventions
Training the impaired hand on a configuration task
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 21 and older
- Ischemic stroke greater than six months ago, confirmed by CT or MRI
- Residuals unilateral upper extremity weakness
- Ability to give informed consent and understand the tasks involved.
- Appearance of Flexion synergy in hand.
- Ability to extent finger at least for 5 degrees.
You may not qualify if:
- Cognitive impairment, with score on Montreal Cognitive assessment (MoCA) ≤ 20
- History of physical or neurological condition that interferes with study procedures or assessment of motor function (e.g. severe arthritis, severe neuropathy, Parkinson's disease)
- Contraindication to tDCS (deep brain stimulators or other metal in the head, skull defect, pacemaker)
- Inability to sit in a chair and perform upper limb exercises for one hour at a time
- Participation in another upper extremity rehabilitative therapy study or tDCS study during the study period
- Terminal illness
- Social and/or personal circumstances that interfere with ability to return for therapy sessions and follow up assessments
- Pregnancy
- Severe Neglect
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pablo Celnik
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2017
First Posted
August 21, 2017
Study Start
March 3, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 30, 2020
Last Updated
November 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share