NCT02017574

Brief Summary

Stroke is one of the leading causes of chronic disability in Veterans. Stroke is associated with significant loss of mobility, increased risk of falling, cardiovascular disease, depression and neuro-cognitive impairment. These deficits negatively impact the independent completion of the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Task-oriented training has emerged as the dominant therapeutic intervention in the rehabilitation of chronic stroke victims. The effectiveness of these interventions may be enhanced through facilitation of implicit knowledge rather than explicit knowledge. Specifically, implicit learning increases retention and improves transfer of the improved motor function outside of the lab environment. Moreover, implicit motor control reduces the burden imposed on cognitive resources as the skill is performed automatically (i.e. do not have to 'think' about it). The amount and type of feedback individuals receive while learning a new task (or relearning in the case of rehabilitation) has been shown to influence the type of learning (i.e. implicit or explicit). Thus the purpose of the current study is to determine the effect of different types of feedback during motor learning on the learning type and the resultant impact on functional outcomes (i.e. motor performance, retention, and cognitive workload) in chronic stroke patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2015

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 10, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 28, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

December 16, 2013

Results QC Date

October 17, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 23, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

StrokeCerebral Infarction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Motor Performance

    Quality of motor behavior was indexed by the percentage of samples in which the participants were within the trained (i.e. optimal) trajectory. The trained trajectory was a 2cm wide channel in the shape of a half circle between two targets which were 25cm apart from each other. Therefore, the scale measure is a percentage which can range between 0 and 100%.

    2 Years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • EEG Derived High Alpha Power

    2 Years

Study Arms (2)

Implicit Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Receives little feedback about task performance during learning

Behavioral: Reaching Task

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receives detailed feedback about task performance during learning

Behavioral: Reaching Task

Interventions

Reaching TaskBEHAVIORAL

Learn a reaching task that requires coordination of the arm segments

ControlImplicit Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ischemic stroke greater than 3 months prior.
  • Between 45 and 80 years of age.
  • Residual hemiparetic upper extremity deficits.
  • Adequate language and neurocognitive function to participate in training (MMSE, CESD, aphasia screening).
  • Right hand dominant.
  • Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score of 25 or greater.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of cortical stroke.
  • No mobility of less affected arm.
  • Failure to meet the RRDC assessment clinic criteria for medical eligibility.
  • MMSE score less than 27.
  • CES-D score greater than 16.
  • Unable to pass a hearing test (i.e. must be able to hear sounds of 45 dB or less).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeCerebral Infarction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesBrain InfarctionBrain IschemiaInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNecrosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jeremy Rietschel, PhD
Organization
Baltimore Veterans Affairs

Study Officials

  • Jeremy C Rietschel, PhD MA BA

    Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2013

First Posted

December 20, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

March 28, 2017

Results First Posted

February 10, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations