Investigating Train the Trainer Delivery of Mindfulness-based Training
TTT
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness training (MT) on cognitive and psychological factors when incorporated to the duty-day schedule of servicemembers (via proctored mindfulness practice). Based on prior literature, it can be hypothesized that the benefits of MT on measures of attention, working memory, and psychological well-being will be greater for servicemembers who engage in proctored mindfulness practice and receive duty-day support compared to servicemembers who practice independently, on their own time, with no structured duty day support.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 5, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 5, 2017
CompletedSeptember 18, 2018
September 1, 2018
2 months
July 25, 2017
September 14, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART)
The SART is used to assess attentional performance and self-reported mind wandering (i.e., off-task thinking which is typically self-generated and compromises the performance of the task at hand). The task uses a continuous performance paradigm involving button presses to frequently presented non-targets (numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) but requires the participants to withhold their response to the infrequent target (number 3). Withholding responses only to infrequent targets encourages a pre-potent response and mind wandering. Real-time subjective experience of mind wandering during SART is assessed through experience-sampling probes randomly presented throughout the task.
Participants will complete the SART at three time points: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Change in Working Memory Task with Affective Distraction (WMDA)
The WMDA is used to assess the ability to hold information in working memory while overcoming emotional reactivity and distraction. Specifically, participants are presented with a memory item that they need to memorize and hold in memory during a delay interval. During the delay, emotionally negative or neutral scene images are presented. The negative images are combat scenes from Iraq or Afghanistan (Morey et al., 2009) and the neutral images are non-combat scenes.
Participants will complete the WMDA at three time points: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)
Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Other Outcomes (10)
Change in Connor-Davidson Resilience Score (CD-RISC)
Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Change in Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (5FMQ)
Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
Change in Combat Experiences Scale (CES)
Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
MBAT with proctored practice
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will engage in Mindfulness Based Attention Training (MBAT) in 4, 2-hour training classes with 1 class per week. Participants in the proctored practice group will complete assigned, out of class mindfulness exercises during the duty day - for example, as part of their daily physical training (e.g., mindful cooldown, final 15 minutes of PT is spent engaging in a mindfulness exercise using a guided recording).
MBAT with non-proctored practice
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will engage in Mindfulness Based Attention Training (MBAT) in 4, 2-hour training classes with 1 class per week. Participants in the non-proctored practice group will complete assigned, out of class mindfulness exercises on their own time with no structured duty day support.
No Training Control
NO INTERVENTIONThis group will receive no intervention.
Interventions
The training program is known as Mindfulness-Based Attention Training, or MBAT. The MBAT program is based on the principles of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, but contextualized for military personnel using themes relevant to military life. The training content is comprised four central themes: concentration, body awareness, open monitoring, and compassion. Participants will have proctored practice and complete the assigned, out-of-class mindfulness exercises during the duty day as party of their physical training.
The training program is known as Mindfulness-Based Attention Training, or MBAT. The MBAT program is based on the principles of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, but contextualized for military personnel using themes relevant to military life. The training content is comprised four central themes: concentration, body awareness, open monitoring, and compassion.Participants will not have proctored practice and will complete the assigned, out-of-class mindfulness exercises on their own.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English-speaking
- Active duty military
- Able to understand and provide signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Non-controlled severe medical disease that might interfere with the performance of the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Miamilead
- Fort Drumcollaborator
- United States Department of Defensecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Miami
Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, United States
Ft. Drum
Fort Drum, New York, 13602, United States
Related Publications (4)
Jha, AP, Morrison, AB, Parker, SC, & Stanley, EA. Practice is protective: Mindfulness training promotes cognitive resilience in high-stress cohorts. Mindfulness. 2016; 7(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0465-9.
BACKGROUNDJha AP, Morrison AB, Dainer-Best J, Parker S, Rostrup N, Stanley EA. Minds "at attention": mindfulness training curbs attentional lapses in military cohorts. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 11;10(2):e0116889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116889. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25671579BACKGROUNDJha AP, Stanley EA, Kiyonaga A, Wong L, Gelfand L. Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):54-64. doi: 10.1037/a0018438.
PMID: 20141302BACKGROUNDJha AP, Witkin JE, Morrison AB, Rostrup N, Stanley E. Short-Form Mindfulness Training Protects Against Working Memory Degradation over High-Demand Intervals. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2017 1(2): 154-171. doi:10.1007/s41465-017-0035-2.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amishi P Jha, Ph.D
University of Miami
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2017
First Posted
August 15, 2017
Study Start
July 25, 2017
Primary Completion
October 5, 2017
Study Completion
October 5, 2017
Last Updated
September 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share