NCT03246178

Brief Summary

This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most if HFD-HSCT was performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen, and our improved outcomes with HFD-HSCT may lead to a salvaged therapy and an expanded direct role for SAA in the future.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 1, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 11, 2017

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

May 1, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

HaploidenticalHematopoietic stem cell transplantationSevere aplastic anemia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Engraftment

    Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days in which the neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.50 × 109/L, and platelet engraftment was defined as the first of five consecutive days in which the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/L without transfusion. GF was classified as follows: (1) primary non-engraftment (failure to reach a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L after transplant); (2) rejection (decrease in blood counts to \< 0.5×109/L neutrophils, after achieving a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L); (3) late graft failure (decrease of blood counts after day 100 to \< 1.0×109/L neutrophils and \< 30×109/L platelets).

    In the first months after infusion

  • Toxicity grading

    The transplantation-related toxicity (TRT) was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Organ damage due to GVHD or infectious complications were excluded.

    TRT was defined as toxic effects occurring within 40 days after HSCT

  • Chimerism analyses +30

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +30 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Days +30 after HSCT

  • Chimerism analyses +100

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +180 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Days +100 after HSCT

  • Chimerism analyses +180

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +100 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Days +180 after HSCT

  • Chimerism analyses +365

    Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +365 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.

    Days +365 after HSCT

  • OS 1-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    1-year after HSCT

  • OS 2-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    2-year after HSCT

  • OS 5-year

    OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.

    5-year after HSCT

  • EFS 1-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure. EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    1-year after HSCT

  • EFS 2-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    2-year after HSCT

  • EFS 5-year

    EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.

    5-year after HSCT

Study Arms (2)

MSD-HSCT

OTHER

This group received treatment of matched sibling donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT).

Other: MSD-HSCT

HFD-HSCT

EXPERIMENTAL

This group received treatment of haploid family donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HFD-HSCT).

Other: HFD-HSCT

Interventions

1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 30mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -1 and was tapered off after 1 months if no aGVHD was observed.

MSD-HSCT

1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 35mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 200-300 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -3 and was tapered off after 2 months if no aGVHD was observed.

HFD-HSCT

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (i) Diagnosis of SAA, very SAA or SAA and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) according to the International Aplastic Anemia Study Group; (ii) SAA patients no response to previous IST; (iii) adequate performance status \[Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2\].

You may not qualify if:

  • (i) Congenital forms of aplastic anemia; (ii)Patients with any severe pulmonary, cardiac, liver, or renal diseases or active infection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Hematology, 304th Clinical Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, 100048, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Aplastic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnemiaHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesBone Marrow Failure DisordersBone Marrow Diseases

Study Officials

  • Xiaoxiong WU, PhD

    The First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
no masking
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients with SAA
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head, Research group of the Center of Hematology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2017

First Posted

August 11, 2017

Study Start

July 10, 2017

Primary Completion

July 1, 2020

Study Completion

December 1, 2020

Last Updated

August 11, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations