Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia
A Research on Haploidentical Transplantation in Severe Aplastic Anemia Using Reduced-intensity Fludarabine-based Conditioning
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a prospective case-control study on SAA patients treated with HSCT, order to further discuss and assess the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of HFD-HSCT which performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen.Our findings would indicate that SAA patients who lack MSD benefited most if HFD-HSCT was performed with reduced-intensity fludarabine-based conditioning regimen, and our improved outcomes with HFD-HSCT may lead to a salvaged therapy and an expanded direct role for SAA in the future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 11, 2017
August 1, 2017
3 years
May 1, 2017
August 8, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Engraftment
Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days in which the neutrophil counts (ANC) exceeded 0.50 × 109/L, and platelet engraftment was defined as the first of five consecutive days in which the platelet count exceeded 20 × 109/L without transfusion. GF was classified as follows: (1) primary non-engraftment (failure to reach a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L after transplant); (2) rejection (decrease in blood counts to \< 0.5×109/L neutrophils, after achieving a neutrophil count of 0.5×109/L); (3) late graft failure (decrease of blood counts after day 100 to \< 1.0×109/L neutrophils and \< 30×109/L platelets).
In the first months after infusion
Toxicity grading
The transplantation-related toxicity (TRT) was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Organ damage due to GVHD or infectious complications were excluded.
TRT was defined as toxic effects occurring within 40 days after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +30
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +30 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Days +30 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +100
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +180 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Days +100 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +180
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +100 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Days +180 after HSCT
Chimerism analyses +365
Chimerism would be evaluated in recipient BM cells usually on days +365 after HSCT using cytogenetic G-banding or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Sex-matched donor-recipient chimerism was assessed using PCR-based analyses of polymorphic minisatellite or microsatellite regions. HLA typing was performed for patients with HLA-haploidentical donors.
Days +365 after HSCT
OS 1-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
1-year after HSCT
OS 2-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
2-year after HSCT
OS 5-year
OS was defined as the time from transplantation to death from any cause or the last follow-up.
5-year after HSCT
EFS 1-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure. EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
1-year after HSCT
EFS 2-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
2-year after HSCT
EFS 5-year
EFS was defined as survival with a response to therapy. Death, GF and relapse were considered as treatment failure.
5-year after HSCT
Study Arms (2)
MSD-HSCT
OTHERThis group received treatment of matched sibling donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT).
HFD-HSCT
EXPERIMENTALThis group received treatment of haploid family donor - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HFD-HSCT).
Interventions
1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 30mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 150-250 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -1 and was tapered off after 1 months if no aGVHD was observed.
1. Conditioning regimens: (A) Patients had SAA and PNH, or heavy transfusion (RBC≥25U), or failed rabbit ATG therapy, and received 0.8 mg/kg/6h busulfan (days -7 to -6), 35mg/m2/day fludarabine (days -5 to -2), 25 mg/kg/day cyclophosphamide (days -5 to -2) and 2.5 mg/kg/day r-ATG (days -5 to -2). (B) The other patients with SAA or VSAA received same procedure but without busulfan; 2. Allogeneic HSC infusion: Doner BM cells were harvested to achieve a target mononuclear cell count (MNC) of 2-4 × 108 per kilogram of recipient weight. The target MNC from PB was 4-6× 108 per kilogram of recipient weight; 3. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: GVHD prophylaxis consisted of intravenous CSP 2-3 mg/kg/day in divided doses beginning on the day before transplantation (day -5) and the target concentration was adjusted to 200-300 ng/ml. The oral MMF dose was 20 mg/kg/day from day -3 and was tapered off after 2 months if no aGVHD was observed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (i) Diagnosis of SAA, very SAA or SAA and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) according to the International Aplastic Anemia Study Group; (ii) SAA patients no response to previous IST; (iii) adequate performance status \[Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-2\].
You may not qualify if:
- (i) Congenital forms of aplastic anemia; (ii)Patients with any severe pulmonary, cardiac, liver, or renal diseases or active infection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wu Xiaoxionglead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Hematology, 304th Clinical Division, Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, 100048, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiaoxiong WU, PhD
The First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- no masking
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head, Research group of the Center of Hematology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2017
First Posted
August 11, 2017
Study Start
July 10, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08