Study Stopped
Sponsor decision
Continuation Study With Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) for Adolescent and Adult Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label Continuation Study With Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) for Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
1 other identifier
interventional
133
1 country
45
Brief Summary
This is a continuation study of Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) in adults and adolescents with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who have completed participation in the SHP621-302 extension study. The purpose of this study is to see if BOS is safe and well tolerated over the long-term in adolescents and adults with EoE.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for phase_3
45 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 7, 2022
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
November 1, 2022
4.6 years
August 8, 2017
September 27, 2022
January 30, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, and is an important medical event. Both serious and Non-serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure. TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date on or after the first dose of investigational product or a start date before the date of the first dose of investigational product that increased in severity or after the date of the first dose.
From start of study drug administration up to End of study (EOS) (Up to Month 53)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Findings
Number of participants with clinically significant physical examination findings were reported. Clinical significance was determined by investigator.
From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Participants were assessed by investigator for any clinically significant changes in vital parameters like temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, BMI, and weight. Vital signs were assessed after the participant had been in a supine position for at least 5 minutes immediately prior to the assessment. The criteria for clinically significant change was as per the investigators discretion.
From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) For Adolescents Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at Month 12
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is less than (\<) -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis). Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 12 was reported.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \<-2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24 was reported.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36 was reported.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48 was reported.
Baseline, Month 48
Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (Up to Month 53)
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (up to Month 53) was reported.
Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Stimulation at Month 12
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 12 and reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, Month 12
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 24
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 24 and reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, Month 24
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 36
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 36 and reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, Month 36
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 48
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 48 and reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, Month 48
Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at EOS (Up to Month 53)
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at EOS (up to Month 53) and reported in this outcome measure.
Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Assessments
Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, urinalysis; urine pregnancy test. Number of participants with potential clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically meaningful by the investigator were reported.
From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)
Study Arms (1)
Budesonide Oral Suspension
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 10 milliliters (mL) of budesonide oral suspension at a concentration of 0.2 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL), twice daily, for up to 4 years 5 months.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant completed the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) extension study and is considered by the investigator to potentially benefit from continued BOS investigational treatment.
- Participant is able to provide written informed consent (participant, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, participant assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures.
- Females of childbearing potential must agree to continue acceptable birth control measures (example (e.g.): abstinence, surgically sterile male partner, stable oral contraceptives, or double-barrier methods) throughout study participation.
- Participant is willing and has an understanding and ability to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions as defined in protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant has changes in medications or diet during the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study that could affect participation in this continuation study.
- Participant anticipates using swallowed topical corticosteroid for EoE or systemic corticosteroid for any condition during the treatment period; any temporary use (less than or equal to \[≤\] 7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with the medical monitor prospectively but should be avoided within 4 weeks of the scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDs).
- Participant anticipates use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, grapefruit juice) during the continuation study.
- Participant has an appearance at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit of SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) (Visit 8) of an esophageal stricture (high grade), as defined by the presence of a lesion that does not allow passage of a diagnostic adult upper endoscope (e.g., with an insertion tube diameter of greater than (\>) 9 millimeter \[mm\]).
- Participant has presence of esophageal varices at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 8) of the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study.
- Participant has any current disease of the gastrointestinal tract, aside from EoE, including eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, colitis, or proctitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease.
- Participant has other diseases causing or associated with esophageal eosinophilia, including hypereosinophilic syndrome, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, achalasia, or parasitic infection.
- Participant has a potentially serious acute or chronic infection or immunodeficiency condition, including tuberculosis, fungal, bacterial, viral/parasite infection, ocular herpes simplex, or chicken pox/measles.
- Participant has upper gastrointestinal bleeding identified at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 8) of the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study.
- Participant has evidence of active infection with Helicobacter pylori.
- Participant has evidence of unstable asthma.
- Participant is female and pregnant or nursing.
- Participant has a history of intolerance, hypersensitivity, or idiosyncratic reaction to budesonide (or any other corticosteroids), or to any other ingredients of the study medication.
- Participant has a history or high risk of noncompliance with treatment or regular clinic visits.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirelead
- Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (45)
Children's Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Del Sol Research Management
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Arkansas Gastroenterology
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Colorado Children's Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Asthma and Allergy Associates PC
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States
Rocky Mountain Pediatric Gastroenterology
Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States
Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010, United States
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Connecticut GI
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Nature Coast Clinical Research LLC
Inverness, Florida, 34452, United States
Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Childrens Center For Digestive Healthcare
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31201, United States
Grand Teton Research Group
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Gastroenterology of Southern Indiana
New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Indiana University
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Gastroenterology Associates, LLC
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, United States
Clinical Trials Management LLC
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 00211, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Brigham and Womens Hospital
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States
Minnesota Gastroenterology PA
Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446, United States
Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine
Astoria, New York, 11102, United States
Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP
Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Clinical Research of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Consultants PC
Dayton, Ohio, 45440, United States
Great Lakes Gastroenterology
Mentor, Ohio, 44060, United States
Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States
Greenville Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Gastro One
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
Houston Endoscopy and Research Center
Houston, Texas, 77024, United States
Advanced Research Institute
Ogden, Utah, 84405, United States
Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
Emeritas Research Group
Lansdowne Town Center, Virginia, 20176, United States
Blue Ridge Medical Research
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, United States
Related Publications (1)
Dellon ES, Katzka DA, Mukkada VA, Collins MH, Falk GW, Richmond CA, Terreri B, Thakur M, Boules M, Goodwin B, Hirano I. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A 4-Year, Phase 3, Open-Label Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Nov;23(12):2155-2166.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.024. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
PMID: 39954913DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was discontinued prematurely as per sponsor's decision.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Shire
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Shire
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2017
First Posted
August 10, 2017
Study Start
October 5, 2017
Primary Completion
April 26, 2022
Study Completion
April 26, 2022
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Results First Posted
December 7, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as the data are subject to contractual (or consent) provisions that prohibit transfer to third parties.