NCT03245840

Brief Summary

This is a continuation study of Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) in adults and adolescents with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) who have completed participation in the SHP621-302 extension study. The purpose of this study is to see if BOS is safe and well tolerated over the long-term in adolescents and adults with EoE.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
133

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

45 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 10, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 5, 2017

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 26, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 26, 2022

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 7, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2017

Results QC Date

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 30, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, and is an important medical event. Both serious and Non-serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure. TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date on or after the first dose of investigational product or a start date before the date of the first dose of investigational product that increased in severity or after the date of the first dose.

    From start of study drug administration up to End of study (EOS) (Up to Month 53)

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Findings

    Number of participants with clinically significant physical examination findings were reported. Clinical significance was determined by investigator.

    From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Participants were assessed by investigator for any clinically significant changes in vital parameters like temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, BMI, and weight. Vital signs were assessed after the participant had been in a supine position for at least 5 minutes immediately prior to the assessment. The criteria for clinically significant change was as per the investigators discretion.

    From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)

  • Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) For Adolescents Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at Month 12

    The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is less than (\<) -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis). Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 12 was reported.

    Baseline, Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24

    The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \<-2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24 was reported.

    Baseline, Month 24

  • Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36

    The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36 was reported.

    Baseline, Month 36

  • Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48

    The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48 was reported.

    Baseline, Month 48

  • Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (Up to Month 53)

    The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (up to Month 53) was reported.

    Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)

  • Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Stimulation at Month 12

    ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 12 and reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 12

  • Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 24

    ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 24 and reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 24

  • Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 36

    ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 36 and reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 36

  • Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 48

    ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 48 and reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, Month 48

  • Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at EOS (Up to Month 53)

    ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at EOS (up to Month 53) and reported in this outcome measure.

    Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Assessments

    Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, urinalysis; urine pregnancy test. Number of participants with potential clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically meaningful by the investigator were reported.

    From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)

Study Arms (1)

Budesonide Oral Suspension

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received 10 milliliters (mL) of budesonide oral suspension at a concentration of 0.2 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL), twice daily, for up to 4 years 5 months.

Drug: Budesonide oral suspension

Interventions

BOS 10 mL twice daily.

Budesonide Oral Suspension

Eligibility Criteria

Age11 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant completed the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) extension study and is considered by the investigator to potentially benefit from continued BOS investigational treatment.
  • Participant is able to provide written informed consent (participant, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, participant assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures.
  • Females of childbearing potential must agree to continue acceptable birth control measures (example (e.g.): abstinence, surgically sterile male partner, stable oral contraceptives, or double-barrier methods) throughout study participation.
  • Participant is willing and has an understanding and ability to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions as defined in protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant has changes in medications or diet during the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study that could affect participation in this continuation study.
  • Participant anticipates using swallowed topical corticosteroid for EoE or systemic corticosteroid for any condition during the treatment period; any temporary use (less than or equal to \[≤\] 7 days) or initiation of new steroid treatment during the study should be documented and discussed with the medical monitor prospectively but should be avoided within 4 weeks of the scheduled esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGDs).
  • Participant anticipates use of Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, grapefruit juice) during the continuation study.
  • Participant has an appearance at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit of SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) (Visit 8) of an esophageal stricture (high grade), as defined by the presence of a lesion that does not allow passage of a diagnostic adult upper endoscope (e.g., with an insertion tube diameter of greater than (\>) 9 millimeter \[mm\]).
  • Participant has presence of esophageal varices at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 8) of the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study.
  • Participant has any current disease of the gastrointestinal tract, aside from EoE, including eosinophilic gastritis, enteritis, colitis, or proctitis, inflammatory bowel disease, or celiac disease.
  • Participant has other diseases causing or associated with esophageal eosinophilia, including hypereosinophilic syndrome, collagen vascular disease, vasculitis, achalasia, or parasitic infection.
  • Participant has a potentially serious acute or chronic infection or immunodeficiency condition, including tuberculosis, fungal, bacterial, viral/parasite infection, ocular herpes simplex, or chicken pox/measles.
  • Participant has upper gastrointestinal bleeding identified at the EGD at the final treatment evaluation visit (Visit 8) of the SHP621-302 (NCT02736409) study.
  • Participant has evidence of active infection with Helicobacter pylori.
  • Participant has evidence of unstable asthma.
  • Participant is female and pregnant or nursing.
  • Participant has a history of intolerance, hypersensitivity, or idiosyncratic reaction to budesonide (or any other corticosteroids), or to any other ingredients of the study medication.
  • Participant has a history or high risk of noncompliance with treatment or regular clinic visits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (45)

Children's Hospital

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

Location

Phoenix Childrens Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States

Location

Del Sol Research Management

Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States

Location

Arkansas Gastroenterology

North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States

Location

Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

San Diego, California, 92123, United States

Location

Colorado Children's Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Asthma and Allergy Associates PC

Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States

Location

Rocky Mountain Pediatric Gastroenterology

Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States

Location

Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation

Bristol, Connecticut, 06010, United States

Location

Connecticut Children's Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States

Location

Connecticut GI

Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States

Location

Nature Coast Clinical Research LLC

Inverness, Florida, 34452, United States

Location

Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children

Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States

Location

Childrens Center For Digestive Healthcare

Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States

Location

Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia

Macon, Georgia, 31201, United States

Location

Grand Teton Research Group

Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404, United States

Location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Gastroenterology of Southern Indiana

New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States

Location

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Cotton O'Neil Clinical Research Center

Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States

Location

Indiana University

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

Gastroenterology Associates, LLC

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, United States

Location

Clinical Trials Management LLC

Metairie, Louisiana, 70006, United States

Location

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 00211, United States

Location

Boston Children's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Brigham and Womens Hospital

Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467, United States

Location

Minnesota Gastroenterology PA

Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446, United States

Location

Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine

Astoria, New York, 11102, United States

Location

Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group LLP

Great Neck, New York, 11023, United States

Location

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States

Location

Clinical Research of Charlotte

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277, United States

Location

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

Location

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States

Location

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Consultants PC

Dayton, Ohio, 45440, United States

Location

Great Lakes Gastroenterology

Mentor, Ohio, 44060, United States

Location

Digestive Disease Specialists, Inc.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112, United States

Location

Greenville Hospital

Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States

Location

Gastro One

Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States

Location

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States

Location

Houston Endoscopy and Research Center

Houston, Texas, 77024, United States

Location

Advanced Research Institute

Ogden, Utah, 84405, United States

Location

Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

Location

Emeritas Research Group

Lansdowne Town Center, Virginia, 20176, United States

Location

Blue Ridge Medical Research

Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Dellon ES, Katzka DA, Mukkada VA, Collins MH, Falk GW, Richmond CA, Terreri B, Thakur M, Boules M, Goodwin B, Hirano I. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A 4-Year, Phase 3, Open-Label Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Nov;23(12):2155-2166.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.024. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EsophagitisEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastroenteritisEosinophiliaLeukocyte DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

The study was discontinued prematurely as per sponsor's decision.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Shire

Study Officials

  • Study Director

    Shire

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2017

First Posted

August 10, 2017

Study Start

October 5, 2017

Primary Completion

April 26, 2022

Study Completion

April 26, 2022

Last Updated

February 19, 2025

Results First Posted

December 7, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as the data are subject to contractual (or consent) provisions that prohibit transfer to third parties.

Locations