Standard Levator Aponeurosis / Muscle Resection With Three Point Fixation Versus Two Point Fixation Tucking for Congenital Ptosis With Fair to Good Levator Function
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Study Start
May 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
July 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 2017
Actual (reported)to evaluate the surgical effect of levator aponeurosis resection Versus two point fixation levator aponeurosis Tucking for Congenital Ptosis
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
July 2017
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
December 16, 2016
Actual (reported)July 2017
Actual (reported)July 2017
Actual (reported)August 4, 2017
Actual (reported)Comparison of surgical efficacy of standard levator aponeurosis resection and two point fixation tucking regarding MRD1
MRD1:distance between upper lid margin and corneal light reflex measured in mm by transparent ruler
6 to 9 months
20 patients who will undergo levator aponeurosis resection technique
20 patients who will undergo two point fixation levator tucking technique
The levator aponeurosis was dissected from the upper border of the tarsal plate and conjunctiva. The aponeurosis was measured for the desired amount of resection and fixed to the exposed tarsal border with three point mattress sutures with 6-0 prolene then amount measured resect. The skin incision closed by continuous suture with 6-0 prolene.
The levator aponeurosis was dissected from the upper border of the tarsal plate and conjunctiva. . The aponeurosis was measured for desired amount of tucking The skin incision closed by continuous suture with 7-0 prolene.
HEBA
Cairo, Zahraa AL Maadi, Egypt
RANIA AS EL ASSAWY, PhD
Cairo University
Sameh HA ABDEL BAKY, MD
Cairo University
DINA HO HASSANIEN, MD
Cairo University
40 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
December 16, 2016
First Posted
August 4, 2017
Study Start
May 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
July 2017
Actual (reported)Study Completion
July 2017
Actual (reported)Last Updated
August 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: