Classification of the Sagittal Profile of the Spine in Asymptomatic Elderly Subjects
EOS60
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Principal aim The main purpose of the study is to describe the distribution of the sagittal profile in elderly subjects in order to bridge the gap present in this type of screening, evaluated in the literature for adults only (i.e. 160 subjects considered by Roussouly et al. in 2005). This classification assigns an integer value from 1 to 4 in relation to the evaluation of alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the sagittal plane. The population description is therefore divided into four categories. The extension of this classification to elderly can provide useful support for the clinical evaluation and the specific treatment of the elderly patients. Secondary aims The study aims in addition to evaluate the relation between the spine sagittal profile and the objective indexes obtained from the assessment of fall-risk and gait cycle analysis. Accordingly, a subgroup of 40 subjects out of the 160 will be evaluated. This subgroup will consider the subjects older than or equal to 74 years, where the risk of falling is most likely to be expected.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 3, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 3, 2019
CompletedAugust 2, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.8 years
July 19, 2017
August 1, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Classification of Roussouly type
This classification assigns an integer value ranging from 1 to 4, in relation to the evaluation of lumbar spine and pelvis alignment in the sagittal plane. It will be acquired to describe subjects' population, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Subject's weight
Subject's weight (kg) will be acquired to describe subjects' population
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Subject's height
Subject's height (cm) will be acquired to describe subjects' population
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Thoracic kyphosis
Thoracic kyphosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Lumbar lordosis
Lumbar lordosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Pelvic incidence
Pelvic incidence (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Sacral slope
Sacral slope (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Pelvic tilt
Pelvic tilt (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Lateral pelvic inclination
Lateral pelvic inclination (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Pelvic torsion
Pelvic torsion (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Fall-risk score
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Functional forward flexion
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
CoP sway area
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Gait analysis: stance phase
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Gait analysis: swing phase
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
X-ray examination, fall-risk and gait
OTHERsimultaneous acquisition in upright position of two full-body radiographic images, one in the coronal plane and one in the sagittal plane. In addition, 40 out of 160 subjects will undergo fall-risk assessment and gait cycle analysis evaluation.
Interventions
Radiological examination of frontal and lateral planes, simultaneously acquired with low dose X-ray system (EOS system, France) in one single exposition. The evaluation of the radiographic images will be performed by an orthopedic physician.Image processing will be performed by a biomedical engineer through sterEOS proprietary software and will provide the anatomical parameters needed to classify the sagittal profile.
This evaluation will be performed after the radiographic scan, in the same day. The fall-risk assessment test will be performed by a biomedical engineer through OAK device (OAK, Khymeia, Italy). The OAK device integrates two force plates and sensory elastic straps applied to pelvis and limbs. This test, which takes approximately twenty minutes, accounts eight consecutive postural equilibrium exercises and provide the automatic detection of subject's postural parameters. At the end of the test, the fall-risk rating is automatically assigned.
This assessment will be performed in the same session of fall-risk evaluation. The gait cycle analysis, which takes approximately forty minutes, will be executed by a biomedical engineer. Adhesive passive reflective markers will be placed on the skin according to a protocol suitable to characterize the alignment of lower limbs and trunk. The markers trajectories during walk will be recorded by an eight cameras optoelectronic system (BTS smart-D, Italy). A force platform (Kistler, Switzerland) placed in the middle of the pathway will detect the forces exchanged with the ground. The data analysis will provide the kinematic and kinetic descriptive parameters of gait cycle.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- older than or equal to 60 years
- subscription of informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Significant painful episodes linked to the spine in the last 2 years
- Early surgical interventions involving the spine
- scoliosis or other spine pathologies (vertebral, neurological, muscular)
- Obesity (BMI\> 30 kg / m2)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marco Brayda-Bruno, MD
Milan, Milan, 20161, Italy
Related Publications (11)
Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CW, Schwab A, Pankalla K, Buck FM. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jul;42(7):959-67. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1600-0. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
PMID: 23536038BACKGROUNDDreischarf M, Albiol L, Rohlmann A, Pries E, Bashkuev M, Zander T, Duda G, Druschel C, Strube P, Putzier M, Schmidt H. Age-related loss of lumbar spinal lordosis and mobility--a study of 323 asymptomatic volunteers. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116186. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25549085BACKGROUNDGelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1351-8.
PMID: 7676332BACKGROUNDHammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Feb;16(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200302000-00008.
PMID: 12571484BACKGROUNDJackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 15;23(16):1750-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00008.
PMID: 9728376BACKGROUNDJackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2808-15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00014.
PMID: 11064527BACKGROUNDPellet N, Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Rigal J, Le Huec JC. Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):647-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1933-0. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
PMID: 21845396BACKGROUNDRoussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):346-53. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65.
PMID: 15682018BACKGROUNDShah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1166-73. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25026140.
PMID: 23175483BACKGROUNDStagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jul-Aug;7(4):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00003.
PMID: 7135066BACKGROUNDVedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):211-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00012.
PMID: 9474728BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marco Brayda-Bruno, MD
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2017
First Posted
August 2, 2017
Study Start
June 14, 2017
Primary Completion
April 3, 2019
Study Completion
April 3, 2019
Last Updated
August 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share