NCT03237039

Brief Summary

Principal aim The main purpose of the study is to describe the distribution of the sagittal profile in elderly subjects in order to bridge the gap present in this type of screening, evaluated in the literature for adults only (i.e. 160 subjects considered by Roussouly et al. in 2005). This classification assigns an integer value from 1 to 4 in relation to the evaluation of alignment of the lumbar spine and pelvis in the sagittal plane. The population description is therefore divided into four categories. The extension of this classification to elderly can provide useful support for the clinical evaluation and the specific treatment of the elderly patients. Secondary aims The study aims in addition to evaluate the relation between the spine sagittal profile and the objective indexes obtained from the assessment of fall-risk and gait cycle analysis. Accordingly, a subgroup of 40 subjects out of the 160 will be evaluated. This subgroup will consider the subjects older than or equal to 74 years, where the risk of falling is most likely to be expected.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
160

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 14, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 19, 2017

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 2, 2017

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 3, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 3, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

August 1, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Roussouly typespine alignmentfall-riskgait cycle analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Classification of Roussouly type

    This classification assigns an integer value ranging from 1 to 4, in relation to the evaluation of lumbar spine and pelvis alignment in the sagittal plane. It will be acquired to describe subjects' population, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Subject's weight

    Subject's weight (kg) will be acquired to describe subjects' population

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Subject's height

    Subject's height (cm) will be acquired to describe subjects' population

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Thoracic kyphosis

    Thoracic kyphosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Lumbar lordosis

    Lumbar lordosis (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Pelvic incidence

    Pelvic incidence (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Sacral slope

    Sacral slope (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Pelvic tilt

    Pelvic tilt (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Lateral pelvic inclination

    Lateral pelvic inclination (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Pelvic torsion

    Pelvic torsion (°) will be accounted for the spine alignment classification, and correlations with fall-risk and gait cycle indexes will be checked for.

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Fall-risk score

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Functional forward flexion

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • CoP sway area

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Gait analysis: stance phase

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • Gait analysis: swing phase

    Through study completion, an average of 18 months

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

X-ray examination, fall-risk and gait

OTHER

simultaneous acquisition in upright position of two full-body radiographic images, one in the coronal plane and one in the sagittal plane. In addition, 40 out of 160 subjects will undergo fall-risk assessment and gait cycle analysis evaluation.

Radiation: X-ray examinationOther: fall-risk assessmentOther: gait cycle analysis

Interventions

Radiological examination of frontal and lateral planes, simultaneously acquired with low dose X-ray system (EOS system, France) in one single exposition. The evaluation of the radiographic images will be performed by an orthopedic physician.Image processing will be performed by a biomedical engineer through sterEOS proprietary software and will provide the anatomical parameters needed to classify the sagittal profile.

X-ray examination, fall-risk and gait

This evaluation will be performed after the radiographic scan, in the same day. The fall-risk assessment test will be performed by a biomedical engineer through OAK device (OAK, Khymeia, Italy). The OAK device integrates two force plates and sensory elastic straps applied to pelvis and limbs. This test, which takes approximately twenty minutes, accounts eight consecutive postural equilibrium exercises and provide the automatic detection of subject's postural parameters. At the end of the test, the fall-risk rating is automatically assigned.

X-ray examination, fall-risk and gait

This assessment will be performed in the same session of fall-risk evaluation. The gait cycle analysis, which takes approximately forty minutes, will be executed by a biomedical engineer. Adhesive passive reflective markers will be placed on the skin according to a protocol suitable to characterize the alignment of lower limbs and trunk. The markers trajectories during walk will be recorded by an eight cameras optoelectronic system (BTS smart-D, Italy). A force platform (Kistler, Switzerland) placed in the middle of the pathway will detect the forces exchanged with the ground. The data analysis will provide the kinematic and kinetic descriptive parameters of gait cycle.

X-ray examination, fall-risk and gait

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • older than or equal to 60 years
  • subscription of informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant painful episodes linked to the spine in the last 2 years
  • Early surgical interventions involving the spine
  • scoliosis or other spine pathologies (vertebral, neurological, muscular)
  • Obesity (BMI\> 30 kg / m2)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Marco Brayda-Bruno, MD

Milan, Milan, 20161, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CW, Schwab A, Pankalla K, Buck FM. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Jul;42(7):959-67. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1600-0. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

    PMID: 23536038BACKGROUND
  • Dreischarf M, Albiol L, Rohlmann A, Pries E, Bashkuev M, Zander T, Duda G, Druschel C, Strube P, Putzier M, Schmidt H. Age-related loss of lumbar spinal lordosis and mobility--a study of 323 asymptomatic volunteers. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 30;9(12):e116186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116186. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25549085BACKGROUND
  • Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jun 15;20(12):1351-8.

    PMID: 7676332BACKGROUND
  • Hammerberg EM, Wood KB. Sagittal profile of the elderly. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Feb;16(1):44-50. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200302000-00008.

    PMID: 12571484BACKGROUND
  • Jackson RP, Peterson MD, McManus AC, Hales C. Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 15;23(16):1750-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808150-00008.

    PMID: 9728376BACKGROUND
  • Jackson RP, Hales C. Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2808-15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00014.

    PMID: 11064527BACKGROUND
  • Pellet N, Aunoble S, Meyrat R, Rigal J, Le Huec JC. Sagittal balance parameters influence indications for lumbar disc arthroplasty or ALIF. Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):647-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1933-0. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

    PMID: 21845396BACKGROUND
  • Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):346-53. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65.

    PMID: 15682018BACKGROUND
  • Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol. 2012 Dec;85(1020):e1166-73. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25026140.

    PMID: 23175483BACKGROUND
  • Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, Gonon GP, Costanzo G, Dimnet J, Pasquet A. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 Jul-Aug;7(4):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198207000-00003.

    PMID: 7135066BACKGROUND
  • Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, Bridwell KH. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jan 15;23(2):211-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00012.

    PMID: 9474728BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asymptomatic Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Marco Brayda-Bruno, MD

    IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: symptomatic elderly subjects
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2017

First Posted

August 2, 2017

Study Start

June 14, 2017

Primary Completion

April 3, 2019

Study Completion

April 3, 2019

Last Updated

August 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations