Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution - REDCAKE
REDCAKE
1 other identifier
observational
972
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to create a database of keratoconic eyes with two or more corneal topographies/tomographies, at least 5 months apart
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedNovember 3, 2020
November 1, 2020
1.3 years
July 27, 2017
November 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To obtain a database, containing at least two valid corneal Scheimpflug measurements recorded at least 5 months apart, of 1500 keratoconus patients.
These data will be used to create a personalized three-dimensional model of the cornea at each time point, which permits classifying corneas according to shape and stage, as well as assessing the influence of patient age, gender, family history and ophthalmic habits (e.g. eye rubbing) on keratoconus progression. Based on corneal changes over time, an estimate of the underlying biomechanical changes will be made.
5 months
To develop software to automatically detect keratoconus and estimate the keratoconus progression speed
The data from Outcome 1 will be combined to develop software for automated keratoconus detection and progression risk assessment to help ophthalmologists decide when to perform cross-linking on their patients.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To improve the predictive model for keratoconus progression speed so it can work using only one single measurement
18 months
Study Arms (1)
Keratoconus patients
This study involves a retrospective analysis of data recorded during routine clinical follow-up of keratoconus patients. As such, the impact for the patient is minimal as no additional tests need to be performed
Eligibility Criteria
This study involves a retrospective analysis of data recorded during routine clinical follow-up of keratoconus patients. As such, the impact for the patient is minimal as no additions tests need to be performed
You may qualify if:
- Age between 12-40 years.
- Clinically diagnosed mild or moderate keratoconus in one or both eyes
- Two or more Scheimpflug measurements (type Pentacam HR, Pentacam AXL, Ziemer Galilei, CSO Sirius) of good technical quality, separated at least five months apart.
You may not qualify if:
- Corneal scarring present in both eyes.
- Known corneal or retinal pathologies, apart from keratoconus
- Known ocular procedures/ treatments (including crosslinking)
- Known systemic diseases (e.g. diabetes, MS, HIV/AIDS, hypertension,…), except allergies
- Change in contact lenses between measurements (e.g. start wearing lenses, change from corneal to scleral lenses, etc.)
- Fluorescein drops instilled into the eye before Scheimpflug measurement.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, 2650, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Koppen C, Jimenez-Garcia M, Kreps EO, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Rozema JJ; REDCAKE Study Group. Definitions for Keratoconus Progression and Their Impact on Clinical Practice. Eye Contact Lens. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001038. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
PMID: 37816249DERIVEDJimenez-Garcia M, Kreps EO, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Rozema JJ; REDCAKE Study Group. Determining the Most Suitable Tomography-Based Parameters to Describe Progression in Keratoconus. The Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution Project. Eye Contact Lens. 2021 Sep 1;47(9):486-493. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000800.
PMID: 34050086DERIVEDJimenez-Garcia M, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Varssano D, Rozema JJ; and The REDCAKE Study Group. Baseline Findings in the Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution (REDCAKE) Project. Cornea. 2021 Feb 1;40(2):156-167. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002389.
PMID: 32541189DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior researcher, Dpt of Ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2017
First Posted
August 1, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
November 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share