Robotic Therapy and Brain Stimulation in the Early Phase After Stroke
Effects of Robotic Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Performance of the Paretic Upper Limb in the Early Phase After Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is the second cause of death worldwide and the majority of the survivors remain with motor impairments. Inhibition of the motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere has emerged as a potential intervention to enhance effects of other rehabilitation strategies on improvement of motor performance of the paretic upper limb. In this proof-of-concept study we will evaluate the effects of inhibition of the motor cortex of the unaffected hemisphere associated with robotic therapy on improvement of motor performance of the paretic upper limb in the early phase post-stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Aug 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 28, 2022
October 1, 2022
7.3 years
July 24, 2017
October 27, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Movement Smoothness
The speed shape, calculated as mean speed divided by peak speed.
Kinematic assessment at baseline, immediately after intervention; and 24h after.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of peaks of the movement
kinematic assessment at baseline, immediately after intervention; and 24h after.
Jerk metric of the movement
kinematic assessment at baseline, immediately after intervention; and 24h after
Study Arms (2)
Active stimulation + robotic therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied during 20 minutes prior to robotic training. Number of interventions sessions: 1
Sham stimulation + robotic therapy
SHAM COMPARATORSham transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied during 20 minutes prior to robotic training. Number of interventions sessions: 1
Interventions
Robotic therapy (MIT - Manus, Interactive Motion Technologies) will be administered for 40 minutes to the paretic upper limb.
Active transcranial direct current stimulation will be applied with the cathode positioned over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and the anode over the contralateral supraorbital region for 20 minutes (1mA).
In sham transcranial direct current stimulation, no current will be delivered through the transcranial direct current stimulation device after the first 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke onset from 3 days to 9 weeks before, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
- Motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 1 - 3 in the Medical Research Council Scale, for at lest one the following movements: elbow extension, shoulder flexion, or shoulder extension.
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
- Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist or fingers, defined as a score of \> 3 in the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale.
- No active shoulder and elbow movements
- Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease
- Pregnancy
- Potential contraindications to transcranial direct current stimulation: history of seizures, lesions on the scalp, intracranial metal implants, prior intracranial surgery, use of drugs that interfere on cortical excitability (such as antiepileptic drugs, benzodiazepines)
- Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease
- Psychiatric illness
- Aphasia or severe cognitive deficits that compromise comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent.
- Hemineglect
- Cerebellar lesions or on cerebellar pathways
- Contact precautions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Suzana Bleckmann Reis
São Paulo, 05403900, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adriana B Conforto, D, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2017
First Posted
July 26, 2017
Study Start
August 3, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10