Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Motor Training in Stroke
2 other identifiers
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cerebrovascular disease is a major cause of disability worldwide. The catastrophic burden of stroke is more dramatic in low- and middle- income countries, and the scarcity of evidence-based rehabilitation interventions represents a major challenge to global health care. Upper limb weakness is frequent after stroke, but there is no universally accepted treatment to effectively improve hand function in patients with moderate and severe motor impairment. These are the patients in deepest need of rehabilitative interventions. This project addresses this important issue, by testing effects of a novel approach. The investigators will non-invasively stimulate peripheral nerves in order to enhance effects of motor training aided by an electrical stimulation device in patients with moderate to severe hand weakness. Our hypothesis is that peripheral nerve stimulation will enhance effects of motor training in patients in the chronic stage after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 22, 2021
November 1, 2020
4 years
December 29, 2015
July 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Wolf Motor Function Test
The primary outcome will be evaluated before the intervention and 6 weeks after the beginning of the intervention.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Motor Activity Log
18 weeks
Active range of motion of wrist extension in the paretic side
18 weeks
Active range of motion of wrist flexion in the paretic side
18 weeks
Grasp force in the paretic side
18 weeks
Grip force in the paretic side
18 weeks
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active PNS
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator.
Sham PNS
PLACEBO COMPARATORIn sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.
Interventions
Active PNS will be administered by 2 pairs of surface electrodes (cathode proximal). One pair will overly the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist, and the other pair will overly the radial nerve. Trains of electric stimulation will be delivered at 1 Hz by using isolation units connected to a square pulse stimulator. In sham PNS, the median, ulnar and radial nerves will not be actively stimulated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age, 18 years or older;
- Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke at least six months before, confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;
- Moderate to severe motor impairment of an upper limb, defined as a score between 7 and 50 on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery after stroke, a scale with scores for upper limb ranging from 0 (no function) to 66 (normal function);
- Ability to provide written Informed Consent (patient or legal representative);
- Ability to comply with the schedule of interventions and evaluations in the protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of ability to voluntarily activate any active range of wrist extension;
- Anesthesia of the paretic hand;
- Severe spasticity at the paretic elbow, wrist, or fingers, defined as a score of \>3 on the Modified Ashworth Spasticity Scale;
- Active joint deformity;
- Uncontrolled medical problems such as end-stage cancer or renal disease;
- Pregnancy;
- Seizures, if current use of drugs that may decrease seizure threshold such as tryciclic antidepressants;
- Pacemakers;
- Other neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease;
- Psychiatric illness including severe depression;
- Aphasia or serious cognitive deficits that preclude comprehension of the experimental protocol or ability to provide consent;
- Treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin within the past three months.
- Lesions that affect the cerebellum or cerebelar/vestibular pathways in the brainstem
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospitallead
- Fundação Faculdade de Medicinacollaborator
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)collaborator
- The Cleveland Cliniccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo/Fundação Faculdade de Medicina
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403000, Brazil
Related Publications (2)
Conforto AB, Machado AG, Ribeiro NHV, Plow EB, Liew SL, da Costa Leite C, Zavaliangos-Petropulu A, Menezes I, Dos Anjos SM, Luccas R, Peckham PH, Cohen LG. Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation as an Add-On Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Dec;35(12):1059-1064. doi: 10.1177/15459683211046259. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
PMID: 34587830DERIVEDConforto AB, Machado AG, Menezes I, Ribeiro NHV, Luccas R, Pires DS, Leite CDC, Plow EB, Cohen LG. Treatment of Upper Limb Paresis With Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Sensory Stimulation and Motor Training: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2020 Mar 25;11:196. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00196. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32269549DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adriana Conforto, MD PhD
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo/ Fundação Faculdade de Medicina
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2015
First Posted
January 20, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-11