Reclassifying Constipation Using Imaging and Manometry
RECLAIM
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Constipation is a common condition in which an individual suffers with hard stools which are infrequent and difficult to pass. It is poorly understood and treatment is often unsatisfactory. Many patients also experience pain whilst others do not but it is unclear why . It is believed that the pain arises from contractions in the colon, the lower part of the intestines. Some patients with constipation have weak colonic contraction but surprisingly some, particularly those with a lot of pain have strong contractions which are poorly coordinated. These patients all suffer from constipation but would are likely to need very different treatments. At present we cannot identify what type of abnormality of colonic contractions each individual patient suffers from and so are unable to give them the best treatment. This study will take advantage of two new techniques which have been recently developed. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) which will allow us to see the contractions of the colon in response to a dose of the laxative Moviprep which increases the flow of fluid into the proximal part of the colon and High Resolution Manometry (HRM) which measures the power and direction of the contraction in much more detail than ever before using a pressure sensing catheter placed into the bowel. Using these 2 techniques we will identify the pattern of contractions in 80 patients with constipation and 40 healthy controls. Participants will then enter into a controlled trial of either a drug which stimulates contractions or one which inhibits contraction. We anticipate that the pattern of contractions identified by the non-invasive MRI technique will predict which treatment will reduce their symptoms most as effectively as the more invasive HRM. If this is the case then our MRI test of colonic responsiveness could become widely used in routine clinical practice
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedJuly 7, 2020
July 1, 2019
3.1 years
December 16, 2016
July 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
MRI Endpoint: Maximal MRI Motility Index (MMI) of the ascending colon (AC)
MRI Measure of Colonic Motility
During MRI scan (over 3 hours)
HRM Endpoint: Percentage time occupied by cyclical propagating activity following meal
Manometry recording of colonic motility
During manometry recording (over 6 hours)
Difference in average worst daily pain, scored on a range 1-5 between buscopan and bisacodyl intervention periods.
Over 10 day period
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Maximal MMI of the descending colon (DC)
During MRI scan (over 3 hours)
Whole Gut Transit
Weighted Average Position Score of MRI transit markers 24 hours after ingestion
Number of complete spontaneous bowel movements.
10 day period whilst on intervention (prucalopride/buscopan)
Stool consistency
10 day period whilst on intervention (bisacodyl/buscopan)
PAC-SYM Questionnaire Score
Throughout study. Baseline then at end of each 10 day intervention period.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patients
ACTIVE COMPARATOR80 Patients : 40 FC 40 IBS-C Will have MRI Motility and High Resolution Manometry Then will have: Bisacodyl 10mg once daily for 10 days, and matched placebo hyoscine butylbromide Buscopan 20mg three times daily for 10 days, and matched placebo Both agents will have their matched placebo dispensed alongside the active product of the other agent. All agents to be used in this study as tools for their known mechanisms of action, rather than to assess their effects.
Healthy Volunteers
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 HVs Will have MRI Motility and High Resolution Manometry No other interventions
Interventions
Given as agent to monitor effect on symptoms and then to compare with motility data. Drug itself not being tested.
Given as agent to monitor effect on symptoms and then to compare with motility data. Drug itself not being tested.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged ≥ 16 years
- Capacity to give informed consent for participation
- Ability to understand written and spoken English
- For Constipation Group: Symptoms of constipation meeting Rome IV criteria for functional constipation or constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome
- For Control Group: No symptoms of constipation. This will be defined as a score of 5 or less on the Cleveland Clinic Score
You may not qualify if:
- \. Participation in any clinical trials in the past 3 months 2. Inability to understand written and spoken English 2.3. Pregnancy, assessed by a urinary pregnancy test, or current breastfeeding 3.4. History of significant adverse reaction or hypersensitivity, or known contra-indication to any of the medicinal products or equipment used in the study 4.5. History declared by the candidate of certain pre-existing gastrointestinal disorders, including:
- inflammatory bowel disease
- coeliac disease
- cancer of the gastrointestinal tract 5.6. Any reported history of gastrointestinal resection (excluding appendicectomy or cholecystectomy) 6.7. Presence of an intestinal stoma 7.8. Causes of secondary constipation disorders (e.g. systemic sclerosis / Parkinson's disease) 9. Inability to cease use of medicines that cause constipation or alter colonic contractility (e.g. opioids, smooth muscle relaxants, tricyclic antidepressants) 8.10. Antibiotic use in the last 3 months 9.11. Comorbidity that would prevent safe adherence to the protocol (e.g. inability to lie flat, kidney disease contraindicating use of Moviprep or prucalopride) 10.12. Judgement by the PI that the candidate who will be unable to comply with the full study protocol (e.g. diabetes, severe COPD) 11.13. Contraindication to MRI or colonic manometry
- Examples for MRI include claustrophobia, metallic implants, pacemakers, history of metallic foreign body in eye(s) and penetrating eye injury
- Examples for manometry include diagnosis of previous complications of diverticular disease or previous endoscopic complications 12.14. Clinical evidence of significant pelvic organ prolapse syndromes 13.15. Inadequate screening diary following review iii. Control Group: A screening diary that records \<6 complete spontaneous bowel motions in the fortnight.
- iv. Constipation Group: A screening diary that records \<2 or \>6 complete spontaneous bowel motions in the fortnight
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Nottinghamlead
- University College, Londoncollaborator
- Queen Mary University of Londoncollaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of Nottingham
Nottingham, Notts, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
Queen Mary University of London
London, United Kingdom
University College London
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Wilkinson-Smith V, Scott M, Menys A, Wiklendt L, Marciani L, Atkinson D, Sansone S, Zdanaviciene A, Coupland C, Knowles CH, Dinning P, Taylor SA, Gowland P, Hoad CL, Corsetti M, Spiller RC. Combined MRI, high-resolution manometry and a randomised trial of bisacodyl versus hyoscine show the significance of an enlarged colon in constipation: the RECLAIM study. Gut. 2024 Dec 10;74(1):35-44. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332755.
PMID: 39438126DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin Spiller
University of Nottingham
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2016
First Posted
July 21, 2017
Study Start
July 20, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
July 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to share IPD