NCT03220672

Brief Summary

The goal of the present study is to evaluate the short and long term effectiveness of a tailored assessment and educational intervention on motor control of the pelvic floor muscle in menopausal and non-menopausal women.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2017

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

July 18, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

July 4, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Pelvic floor musclespelvic floor muscle trainingmotor controlEducational interventionmenopause

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Motor Control of Pelvic Floor Muscle by single questionnare

    Women will report an outcome regarding tightening capacity after intervention. It consisted of a one item questionnaire about pelvic floor contraction capacity. It is chosen by the expert panel developed by researcher from this project. The item is a question regarding tightening capacity and it had a polychotomous answer: "How is the tightening capacity of your pelvic floor muscles? a) very high, b) high, c) good, d) optimal, e) bad, f) low, g) very low"

    inmediate effect post education

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Anthropometric

    baseline, inmediate effect post education and 2,4 and 12 weeks. Long time effect 6 months

  • Interview about urinary incontinence

    baseline, inmediate effect post education and 2,4 and 12 weeks. Long time effect 6 months

  • The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI SHORT FORM)

    baseline, inmediate effect post education and 2,4 and 12 weeks. Long time effect 6 months

Study Arms (1)

Expertimental

EXPERIMENTAL

The sample will receive a tailored assessment and educational intervention on Motor Control of the Pelvic Floor Muscle

Behavioral: Tailored assessment and educational

Interventions

Intervention will consist of 45 minutes of anatomy education, pelvic floor assessment and neuromuscular re-education. Women will be given an explanation of how the pelvis is composed, including the viscera and pelvic floor function and anatomy, through a simple explanatory sheet. They will be also informed of the causes of pelvic floor deterioration as well as its consequences.. Neuromuscular re-education will continued by teaching them how to perform slow contractions, fast contractions and lifting contraction. They will be also shown vaginal cones and advised on possible treatment methods if they were needed. After that, women will be given a tip sheet to improve pelvic floor function. Those recommendations will included: Tips to take into account during habits like urination, doing sport, gymnastics or any efforts, pelvic floor muscles exercises and how to use vaginal cones adequately.

Expertimental

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsDue to the aim of the study, the gender of the sample will be female
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded if they have any cognitive disability, physical disability or psychiatric limitations that could limit the participation on the study test

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Chevalier F, Fernandez-Lao C, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Normal reference values of strength in pelvic floor muscle of women: a descriptive and inferential study. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Nov 25;14:143. doi: 10.1186/s12905-014-0143-4.

    PMID: 25420756BACKGROUND
  • Espuna Pons M, Rebollo Alvarez P, Puig Clota M. [Validation of the Spanish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. A questionnaire for assessing the urinary incontinence]. Med Clin (Barc). 2004 Mar 6;122(8):288-92. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(04)74212-8. Spanish.

    PMID: 15030739BACKGROUND
  • Bo K. Pelvic floor muscle training is effective in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, but how does it work? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Mar-Apr;15(2):76-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1125-0. Epub 2004 Jan 24.

    PMID: 15014933BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Researcher of CTS631 University of Malaga

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2017

First Posted

July 18, 2017

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

July 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 18, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06