A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
A Multicenter, Phase 2A, Randomized, Investigator-Blind, Subject-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
76
8 countries
34
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab compared to certolizumab pegol in the treatment of subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Oct 2017
34 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 25, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2023
CompletedJuly 27, 2023
July 1, 2023
2.6 years
July 5, 2017
May 19, 2023
July 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP \[mg/L\] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.
From Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) During the Study Conduct
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study Conduct
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: - Resulted in death - Is life-threatening - Required in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation - Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect - Is an infection that requires treatment with parenteral antibiotics - Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardised the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study Conduct
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - Inactive Disease (ASDAS-ID) at Week 12
Week 12
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Study Arms (2)
Bimekizumab
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive several bimekizumab administrations on pre-defined time points. Placebo will be provided in this arm to mask the certolizumab pegol loading dose.
Certolizumab pegol
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive several certolizumab pegol administrations on pre-defined time points.
Interventions
Two certolizumab pegol doses will be administered. One of these doses is a loading dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented diagnosis of active adult-onset ankylosing spondylitis (AS) as defined by documented radiologic evidence (X-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS (1984) of at least 3 months' symptom duration and age of onset \<45 years
- Subject has moderate to severe active disease at the Screening Visit as defined by each of the following:
- Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score \>=4
- Spinal pain \>=4 on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) (from BASDAI Item 2)
- Subjects must have had an inadequate response to, have a contraindication to, or have been intolerant to at least 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Subjects taking corticosteroids must be on a maximum daily dose of \<=10mg/day oral prednisolone or equivalent
- Subjects taking methotrexate (MTX; \<=25 mg/week) are allowed to continue their medication if they received a stable dose for at least 12 weeks before randomization
- Subjects taking sulfasalazine (up to 3 grams/day) or hydroxychloroquine (up to 400 mg per day total) are allowed to continue their medication if started at least 12 weeks prior to randomization
- Subject who has been on an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agent must have experienced an inadequate response to previous or current treatment given at an approved dose for at least 3 months or have been intolerant to at least 1 administration of an anti-TNFα agent. Subjects may not have been on more than 1 anti-TNFα agent
- Subject has high-sensitive C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) levels \>=3 mg/L at the Screening Visit
- Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or, if of childbearing potential, must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception up till 20 weeks after last administration of investigational medicinal product (IMP)
- Male subjects with a partner of childbearing potential must be willing to use a condom when sexually active, up till 20 weeks after the last administration of IMP
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subjects with a total ankylosis of the spine, or a diagnosis of any other inflammatory arthritis eg, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or reactive arthritis
- Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection (except for the common cold)
- Subject has received previous or current biological treatment other than TNFα inhibitor treatment
- Subject has chronic, recurrent, recent serious / life-threatening or current infection, as defined in the protocol
- Subject has history of certain atypical infections, viral hepatitides, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, tuberculosis, as defined in the protocol
- Subjects receiving any live vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline
- Subjects with known tuberculosis (TB) infection, at high risk of acquiring TB infection, with latent TB infection or current or history of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMB) infection
- Subject has immunosuppressive condition or treatment, recent history of malignancy (some exceptions) or demyelinating disease
- Subjects with concurrent malignancy or a history of malignancy during the past 5 years will be excluded, with following exceptions that may be included:
- \<= 3 excised or ablated basal cell carcinomas of the skin
- One squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (stage T1 maximum) successfully excised, or ablated only (other treatments, ie, chemotherapy, do not apply), with no signs of recurrence or metastases for more than 2 years prior to Screening
- Actinic keratosis (-es)
- Squamous cell carcinoma-in-situ of the skin successfully excised, or ablated, more than 6 months prior to Screening
- Subject has history of psychiatric disorder, including suicidality (as defined in the protocol
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (34)
As0013 908
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174, United States
As0013 903
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516, United States
As0013 902
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103, United States
As0013 906
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
As0013 202
Kladno, Czechia
As0013 205
Ostrava, Czechia
As0013 201
Prague, Czechia
As0013 203
Prague, Czechia
As0013 302
Berlin, Germany
As0013 306
Berlin, Germany
As0013 304
Erlangen, Germany
As0013 303
Hamburg, Germany
As0013 301
Herne, Germany
As0013 405
Athens, Greece
As0013 404
Heraklion, Greece
As0013 401
Pátrai, Greece
As0013 402
Thessaloniki, Greece
As0013 406
Thessaloniki, Greece
As0013 501
Chisinau, Moldova
As0013 601
Amsterdam, Netherlands
As0013 708
Bialystok, Poland
As0013 709
Krakow, Poland
As0013 706
Olsztyn, Poland
As0013 703
Poznan, Poland
As0013 702
Torun, Poland
As0013 701
Warsaw, Poland
As0013 704
Warsaw, Poland
As0013 707
Wroclaw, Poland
As0013 801
Kazan', Russia
As0013 803
Kemerovo, Russia
As0013 806
Moscow, Russia
As0013 807
Moscow, Russia
As0013 802
Yaroslavl, Russia
As0013 805
Yaroslavl, Russia
Related Publications (1)
Baraliakos X, de Jongh J, Poddubnyy D, Zwezerijnen GJC, Hemke R, Glatt S, Shaw S, Ionescu L, El Baghdady A, Mann J, Maguire RP, Vaux T, de Peyrecave N, Oortgiesen M, Baeten D, van der Laken C. Impact of bimekizumab and certolizumab pegol on efficacy, safety and osteoblastic activity in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a phase IIa, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, exploratory study with PET-CT imaging. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2024 Nov 28;16:1759720X241293944. doi: 10.1177/1759720X241293944. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39620046DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- UCB
- Organization
- Cares
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
UCB Cares
+1-844-599-2273 (UCB)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is an investigator-blind and subject-blind study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
- Expanded Access
- Yes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2017
First Posted
July 12, 2017
Study Start
October 4, 2017
Primary Completion
May 25, 2020
Study Completion
May 25, 2020
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Results First Posted
July 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal.
Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if a determination is made that the data cannot be adequately anonymized.