NCT03214809

Brief Summary

Study to assess the possible effects of the use of a point-of-care thoracic ultrasound protocol for hospital medical emergency teams (MET)

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 18, 2019

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 11, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 11, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ultrasoundMET teamConcordance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Concordance between MET diagnosis with and without the use of ultrasound with the chart review definitive diagnosis will be studied

    final diagnosis will be determined by 2 independent experts on the basis of chart review and will be compared with the MET team diagnosis. There are 8 pre defined diagnosis categories. The difference in concordance between the MET diagnosis with and without the use of ultrasound with the definitive diagnosis will be tested with a chi-square or a Fisher Exact test in case of small expected frequencies.

    after 2-3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Possible difference in diagnostic certainty

    direct after inclusion

  • Possible differences in initial treatment

    direct after inclusion

  • Possible differences in patients' disposition

    direct after inclusion

  • Whether the use of ultrasound was considered to be helpful

    direct after inclusion

  • MET physicians characteristics

    direct after inclusion

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Thoracic ultrasound protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

ABCDE algorithm with Thoracic ultrasound protocol

Diagnostic Test: ultrasound protocol

No Thoracic ultrasound protocol

NO INTERVENTION

ABCDE algorithm without Thoracic ultrasound protocol

Interventions

ultrasound protocolDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

after first assessment and treatment by the MET team, an Multi-organ ultrasound protocol will be run by the MET doctor

Thoracic ultrasound protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients on the general wards in need of treatment by the MET team.

You may not qualify if:

  • age (\<18 years),
  • pregnancy:

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rijnstate Hospital

Arnhem, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Blans MJ, Bousie E, van der Hoeven JG, Bosch FH. A point-of-care thoracic ultrasound protocol for hospital medical emergency teams (METUS) improves diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound J. 2021 Jun 4;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00229-3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DyspneaComaHypotensionShock

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUnconsciousnessConsciousness DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Michael Blans, MD

    Rijnstate Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: When the MET team arrives first assessment will be done according to the abcde algorithm. If immediate interventions are needed (intubation, CPR etc) this will be done first (and noted). After the abcde assessment an initial diagnosis is noted. In the even weeks the thoracic ultrasound protocol will be done, in the uneven weeks not. After the use of ultrasound various variables are noted.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2017

First Posted

July 12, 2017

Study Start

January 18, 2019

Primary Completion

May 11, 2020

Study Completion

May 11, 2020

Last Updated

July 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations