NCT03212352

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare whether a combination of two drugs (Mifepristone and misoprostol) are superior compared to using only one of these drugs (Misoprostol) as medical treatment for a miscarriage. Women in whom early pregnancy failure, 6-14 weeks postmenstrual, is ultrasonographically confirmed qualify for this study. It is expected that the combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol is more effective in reaching complete evacuation, and therefore can prevent more invasive treatment such as curettage.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
342

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

13 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2017

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2017

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 27, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 23, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 16, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 1, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

miscarriagemifepristonemisoprostolmedical treatmentpatient satisfactionabortifacient agents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complete evacuation

    Whether or not complete evacuation (total endometrial thickness \<15 mm) has been acquired will be assessed through ultrasonography.

    six weeks after initial treatment

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • patient satisfaction

    At baseline, day four, two and six weeks after treatment

  • complications

    six weeks after treatment

  • side effects

    six weeks after treatment

  • costs

    up to six weeks after treatment

  • Overall quality of health, as experienced by the patient.

    At baseline, day four, and two and six weeks after initial treatment.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Misoprostol

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Before medical treatment with misoprostol (two doses 400mcg (four hours apart), repeated after 24 hours if no tissue is lost), patients receive an oral placebo.

Drug: Misoprostol

Misoprostol and Mifepristone

EXPERIMENTAL

Before medical treatment with misoprostol (two doses 400mcg (four hours apart), repeated after 24 hours if no tissue is lost), patients receive oral mifepristone (600mg).

Drug: MifepristoneDrug: Misoprostol

Interventions

Adding 600 mg of Mifepristone to the regular treatment with Misoprostol 800 mcg.

Also known as: Mifegyne
Misoprostol and Mifepristone

Regular treatment with Misoprostol 800 mcg.

Also known as: Cytotec
MisoprostolMisoprostol and Mifepristone

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Early pregnancy failure, 6-14 weeks postmenstrual with
  • a crown-rump length ≥ 6mm and no cardiac activity OR
  • a crown-rump length \<6mm and no fetal growth at least one week later OR
  • a gestational sac with absent embryonic pole for at least one week.
  • At least one week after diagnosis OR a discrepancy of at least one week between crown-rump length and calendar gestational age
  • Intra-uterine pregnancy
  • Women aged above 16 years
  • Hemodynamic stable patient
  • No signs of infection
  • No signs of incomplete abortion
  • No contraindications for mifepristone or misoprostol

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Known clotting disorder or use of anticoagulants
  • Known risk factors for, or presence of, a cardiovascular disease
  • Language barrier

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Rijnstate

Arnhem, Gelderland, 6815 AD, Netherlands

Location

Radboud University Medical Centre

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB, Netherlands

Location

Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital

Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6532 SZ, Netherlands

Location

Maasstad Ziekenhuis

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3079 DZ, Netherlands

Location

OLVG

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Amphia Hospital

Breda, Netherlands

Location

Catharina Hospital

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Location

Martini Hospital

Groningen, Netherlands

Location

Zuyderland Medical Centre

Heerlen, Netherlands

Location

St. Antonius Hospital

Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Location

Laurentius Hosptial

Roermond, Netherlands

Location

Haaglanden Medical Centre

The Hague, Netherlands

Location

VieCuri Medical Centre

Venlo, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (31)

  • Graziosi GC, Mol BW, Reuwer PJ, Drogtrop A, Bruinse HW. Misoprostol versus curettage in women with early pregnancy failure after initial expectant management: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2004 Aug;19(8):1894-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh344. Epub 2004 Jun 10.

    PMID: 15192065BACKGROUND
  • You JH, Chung TK. Expectant, medical or surgical treatment for spontaneous abortion in first trimester of pregnancy: a cost analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2873-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei163. Epub 2005 Jun 24.

    PMID: 15979988BACKGROUND
  • Hooker AB, Lemmers M, Thurkow AL, Heymans MW, Opmeer BC, Brolmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of intrauterine adhesions after miscarriage: prevalence, risk factors and long-term reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):262-78. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt045. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

    PMID: 24082042BACKGROUND
  • Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Hooker AB, Opmeer BC, Limpens J, Huirne JA, Ankum WM, Mol BW. Dilatation and curettage increases the risk of subsequent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):34-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev274. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

    PMID: 26534897BACKGROUND
  • Soulat C, Gelly M. [Immediate complications of surgical abortion]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Apr;35(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(06)76389-x. French.

    PMID: 16575361BACKGROUND
  • Niinimaki M, Jouppila P, Martikainen H, Talvensaari-Mattila A. A randomized study comparing efficacy and patient satisfaction in medical or surgical treatment of miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.072. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

    PMID: 16764872BACKGROUND
  • Neilson JP, Hickey M, Vazquez J. Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD002253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002253.pub3.

    PMID: 16855990BACKGROUND
  • van den Berg J, Gordon BBM, Snijders MPML, Vandenbussche FPHA, Coppus SFPJ. The added value of mifepristone to non-surgical treatment regimens for uterine evacuation in case of early pregnancy failure: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

    PMID: 26461963BACKGROUND
  • Lemmers M, Verschoor MAC, Oude Rengerink K, Naaktgeboren C, Bossuyt PM, Huirne JAF, Janssen IAH, Radder C, Klinkert ER, Langenveld J, van der Voet L, Siemens FF, Bongers MY, van Hooff MH, van der Ploeg M, Sjors FPJ, Coppus SFPJ, Ankum WM, Mol BWJ; MisoREST study group. MisoREST: Surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage: A cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Apr;211:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

    PMID: 28209537BACKGROUND
  • Lemmers M, Verschoor MA, Oude Rengerink K, Naaktgeboren C, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt PM, Huirne JA, Janssen CA, Radder C, Klinkert ER, Langenveld J, Catshoek R, Van der Voet L, Siemens F, Geomini P, Van Hooff MH, Van der Ploeg JM, Coppus SF, Ankum WM, Mol BW; MisoREST study group. MisoREST: surgical versus expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation of the uterus after misoprostol treatment for miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2421-2427. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew221. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

    PMID: 27591236BACKGROUND
  • Say L, Kulier R, Gulmezoglu M, Campana A. Medical versus surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2002(1):CD003037. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003037.pub2.

    PMID: 15674900BACKGROUND
  • Kulier R, Kapp N, Gulmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ, Cheng L, Campana A. Medical methods for first trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.

    PMID: 22071804BACKGROUND
  • Maria B, Chaneac M, Stampf F, Ulmann A. [Early pregnancy interruption using an antiprogesterone steroid: Mifepristone (RU 486)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1988;17(8):1089-94. French.

    PMID: 3235788BACKGROUND
  • Grimes DA, Mishell DR Jr, Shoupe D, Lacarra M. Early abortion with a single dose of the antiprogestin RU-486. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;158(6 Pt 1):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90361-4.

    PMID: 2454578BACKGROUND
  • van den Berg J, van den Bent JM, Snijders MP, de Heus R, Coppus SF, Vandenbussche FP. Sequential use of mifepristone and misoprostol in treatment of early pregnancy failure appears more effective than misoprostol alone: a retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Dec;183:16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

    PMID: 25461345BACKGROUND
  • Stockheim D, Machtinger R, Wiser A, Dulitzky M, Soriano D, Goldenberg M, Schiff E, Seidman DS. A randomized prospective study of misoprostol or mifepristone followed by misoprostol when needed for the treatment of women with early pregnancy failure. Fertil Steril. 2006 Oct;86(4):956-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.032.

    PMID: 17027362BACKGROUND
  • Wagaarachchi PT, Ashok PW, Narvekar N, Smith NC, Templeton A. Medical management of early fetal demise using a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2001 Sep;16(9):1849-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1849.

    PMID: 11527887BACKGROUND
  • Gronlund A, Gronlund L, Clevin L, Andersen B, Palmgren N, Lidegaard O. Management of missed abortion: comparison of medical treatment with either mifepristone + misoprostol or misoprostol alone with surgical evacuation. A multi-center trial in Copenhagen county, Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Nov;81(11):1060-5.

    PMID: 12421175BACKGROUND
  • Coughlin LB, Roberts D, Haddad NG, Long A. Medical management of first trimester miscarriage (blighted ovum and missed abortion): is it effective? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Jan;24(1):69-71. doi: 10.1080/01443610310001620332.

    PMID: 14675986BACKGROUND
  • Schreiber CA, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Harwood BJ. Mifepristone and misoprostol for the treatment of early pregnancy failure: a pilot clinical trial. Contraception. 2006 Dec;74(6):458-62. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.07.007. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

    PMID: 17157102BACKGROUND
  • Kollitz KM, Meyn LA, Lohr PA, Creinin MD. Mifepristone and misoprostol for early pregnancy failure: a cohort analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):386.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.026. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

    PMID: 21306697BACKGROUND
  • Torre A, Huchon C, Bussieres L, Machevin E, Camus E, Fauconnier A. Immediate versus delayed medical treatment for first-trimester miscarriage: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):215.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.009. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

    PMID: 22381604BACKGROUND
  • Luise C, Jermy K, May C, Costello G, Collins WP, Bourne TH. Outcome of expectant management of spontaneous first trimester miscarriage: observational study. BMJ. 2002 Apr 13;324(7342):873-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7342.873.

    PMID: 11950733BACKGROUND
  • Rulin MC, Bornstein SG, Campbell JD. The reliability of ultrasonography in the management of spontaneous abortion, clinically thought to be complete: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jan;168(1 Pt 1):12-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90877-7.

    PMID: 8420312BACKGROUND
  • Creinin MD, Harwood B, Guido RS, Fox MC, Zhang J; NICHD Management of Early Pregnancy Failure Trial. Endometrial thickness after misoprostol use for early pregnancy failure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jul;86(1):22-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.02.004.

    PMID: 15207665BACKGROUND
  • Chung TK, Cheung LP, Sahota DS, Haines CJ, Chang AM. Evaluation of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the assessment of retained products of conception after spontaneous abortion. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;45(3):190-3. doi: 10.1159/000009954.

    PMID: 9565145BACKGROUND
  • Jauniaux E, Johns J, Burton GJ. The role of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and investigating early pregnancy failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun;25(6):613-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.1892.

    PMID: 15861413BACKGROUND
  • Verschoor MA, Lemmers M, Wekker MZ, Huirne JA, Goddijn M, Mol BW, Ankum WM. Practice variation in the management of first trimester miscarriage in the Netherlands: a nationwide survey. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014:387860. doi: 10.1155/2014/387860. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

    PMID: 25538770BACKGROUND
  • Hamel CC, Vart P, Vandenbussche FPHA, Braat DDM, Snijders MPLM, Coppus SFPJ. Predicting the likelihood of successful medical treatment of early pregnancy loss: development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model. Hum Reprod. 2022 May 3;37(5):936-946. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac048.

  • Hamel C, Coppus S, van den Berg J, Hink E, van Seeters J, van Kesteren P, Merien A, Torrenga B, van de Laar R, Terwisscha van Scheltinga J, Gaugler-Senden I, Graziosi P, van Rumste M, Nelissen E, Vandenbussche F, Snijders M. Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan 6;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.

  • van den Berg J, Hamel CC, Snijders MP, Coppus SF, Vandenbussche FP. Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Abortion, SpontaneousPatient Satisfaction

Interventions

MifepristoneMisoprostol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EstrenesEstranesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsProstaglandins E, SyntheticProstaglandins, SyntheticProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological Factors

Study Officials

  • Frank P. Vandenbussche, Prof. Dr.

    Radboud University Medical Center

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Before medical treatment with misoprostol (two doses 400mcg (four hours apart), repeated after 24 hours if no tissue is lost), patients will be randomized to oral mifepristone (600mg) or oral placebo (identical in appearance).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2017

First Posted

July 11, 2017

Study Start

June 27, 2018

Primary Completion

January 23, 2020

Study Completion

March 16, 2020

Last Updated

May 1, 2020

Record last verified: 2019-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations