Medical Abortion at Gestational Age of 8 to ≤9 Weeks Versus >9 to ≤12 Weeks
The Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptability of Home-administered Medical Abortion at Gestational Age of 8 to ≤9 Weeks Versus >9 to ≤12 Weeks: A Prospective Cohort Study in Mexico City
1 other identifier
interventional
648
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of home-administered medical abortion at gestational age of 8 to ≤9 weeks versus \>9 to ≤12 weeks among a cohort of women in Mexico City.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJune 20, 2016
June 1, 2016
3 months
August 7, 2015
June 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of participants with complete abortion without surgical intervention by day 30 from mifepristone administration, regardless of misoprostol dosing, by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Experience of any major adverse event overall, and by type (emergency room treatment, hospitalization, transfusion, unrecognized ectopic pregnancy, allergic reaction, infection requiring intravenous treatment, and death), by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
Proportion of participants by gestational age group with complete abortion without surgical intervention after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 doses of misoprostol, by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
Number of participants requiring surgical intervention to complete an abortion due to an ongoing pregnancy, by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
Number of participants requiring surgical intervention to complete an abortion due to the presence of a persistent non-viable sac, by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
Number of participants requiring surgical intervention to complete an abortion due to substantial debris in uterus, by gestational age group
2-4 weeks
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
64-84 days gestational age
EXPERIMENTALWomen whose pregnancies are estimated to have a gestational age of 64-84 days will receive 200 µg mifepristone followed by misoprostol 24-48 hours later.
57-63 days gestational age
NO INTERVENTIONWomen whose pregnancies are estimated to have a gestational age of 57-63 days. (Women in this arm receive the standard of care for medical termination of pregnancy in the stated gestational age range: 200 µg mifepristone administered orally in the clinic on Day 1 then 800 μg misoprostol administered sublingually 24-48 hours later at home with a subsequent dose of 400 μg misoprostol sublingually 6 hours later if she has not expelled the pregnancy).
Interventions
Women at 64-84 days' gestation will use the following dosing regimen: 200 µg mifepristone administered orally in the clinic on Day 1.
The client will then be given a total of 2400 µg misoprostol tablets to take home, and will be instructed to take 800 μg misoprostol administered sublingually 24-48 hours later at home and to administer a subsequent dose of 400 μg misoprostol sublingually every 3 hours up to a total of four further doses or until expulsion of the products of conception, whichever comes first.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 or older
- Intrauterine pregnancy 57- 84 days, assessed using clinical assessment and transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound by crown-rump length (machines will be calibrated and will use a standardized conversion formula to determine gestational age)
- Eligible for medical abortion according to doctor assessment
- Elected medical abortion over surgical abortion after comprehensive counselling
- Haemoglobin level ≥10 g/dl measured by Hemocue
- Willing and able to sign consent forms
- Able to speak and read Spanish
- Agree to comply with the study procedures and visit schedule
- Access to own telephone and to emergency transportation
- Access to a toilet with privacy
- Reside no more than 30 minutes car journey from the Sta. Mónica Hospital in Polanco or the Marie Stopes Mexico Roma Clinic
You may not qualify if:
- History or evidence of disorders that represent a contraindication to the use of mifepristone or misoprostol (chronic adrenal failure, severe asthma uncontrolled by corticosteroid therapy, inherited porphyries, glaucoma, mitral stenosis, hepatic or renal disease)
- History of bleeding disorder or current anticoagulant therapy
- Previous allergic reaction to any drugs in the regimen
- Suspicion of any pathology of pregnancy (e.g. molar, ectopic, non-viable pregnancy)
- Multiple gestation
- Presence of an intrauterine device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ibis Reproductive Healthlead
- Marie Stopes Internationalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Marie Stopes Mexico Azcapotzalco
Del. Azcapotzalco, Mexico Distrito Federal, 02000, Mexico
Marie Stopes Mexico Roma
Del. Cuauhtémoc, Mexico Distrito Federal, 06760, Mexico
Marie Stopes Mexico Pedregal
Del. Tlalpan, Mexico Distrito Federal, 14010, Mexico
Related Publications (10)
Boersma AA, Meyboom-de Jong B, Kleiverda G. Mifepristone followed by home administration of buccal misoprostol for medical abortion up to 70 days of amenorrhoea in a general practice in Curacao. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Apr;16(2):61-6. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2011.555568. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
PMID: 21303309BACKGROUNDChen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone With Buccal Misoprostol for Medical Abortion: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):12-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000897.
PMID: 26241251BACKGROUNDGomperts R, van der Vleuten K, Jelinska K, da Costa CV, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kleiverda G. Provision of medical abortion using telemedicine in Brazil. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
PMID: 24314910BACKGROUNDGouk EV, Lincoln K, Khair A, Haslock J, Knight J, Cruickshank DJ. Medical termination of pregnancy at 63 to 83 days gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jun;106(6):535-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08320.x.
PMID: 10426609BACKGROUNDHamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. Medical abortion at 9-13 weeks' gestation: a review of 1076 consecutive cases. Contraception. 2005 May;71(5):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.10.015.
PMID: 15854631BACKGROUNDHamoda H, Ashok PW, Flett GM, Templeton A. A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2005 Aug;112(8):1102-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00638.x.
PMID: 16045525BACKGROUNDKulier R, Kapp N, Gulmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ, Cheng L, Campana A. Medical methods for first trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub4.
PMID: 22071804BACKGROUNDNgo TD, Park MH, Shakur H, Free C. Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 May 1;89(5):360-70. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.084046. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
PMID: 21556304BACKGROUNDSafe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138196/
PMID: 23700650BACKGROUNDWinikoff B, Dzuba IG, Chong E, Goldberg AB, Lichtenberg ES, Ball C, Dean G, Sacks D, Crowden WA, Swica Y. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1070-6. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826c315f.
PMID: 23090524BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Grossman, MD
Ibis Reproductive Health
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2015
First Posted
April 20, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06