Two Monitors for Measuring the Activated Clotting Time: A Comparison
Comparison of Two Point of Care Techniques Mechanical Versus Biochemical Activated Clotting Time
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this observational study a comparison is made between two different monitors for measurement of the activated clotting time (ACT): mechanical versus biochemical techniques
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedMay 12, 2023
May 1, 2023
6 months
June 13, 2017
May 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Activated Clotting time
Coagulation Measure
Intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Anti-Factor Xa
Intraoperative
Study Arms (1)
CABG Surgical Patients
Patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass
Interventions
Comparison between two point-of-care devices for measurement of the activated clotting time
Eligibility Criteria
Patients admitted for routine coronary bypass surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Heart Centre Umeå University Hospital
Umeå, S-901 85, Sweden
Related Publications (5)
Teufelsbauer H, Proidl S, Havel M, Vukovich T. Early activation of hemostasis during cardiopulmonary bypass: evidence for thrombin mediated hyperfibrinolysis. Thromb Haemost. 1992 Sep 7;68(3):250-2.
PMID: 1440486BACKGROUNDHattersley PG. Progress report: the activated coagulation time of whole blood (ACT). Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Nov;66(5):899-904. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/66.5.899.
PMID: 983997BACKGROUNDGuzzetta NA, Monitz HG, Fernandez JD, Fazlollah TM, Knezevic A, Miller BE. Correlations between activated clotting time values and heparin concentration measurements in young infants undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):173-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e13470. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
PMID: 20519414BACKGROUNDSvenmarker S, Appelblad M, Jansson E, Haggmark S. Measurement of the activated clotting time during cardiopulmonary bypass: differences between Hemotec ACT and Hemochron Jr apparatus. Perfusion. 2004;19(5):289-94. doi: 10.1191/0267659104pf755oa.
PMID: 15506033BACKGROUNDRaymond PD, Ray MJ, Callen SN, Marsh NA. Heparin monitoring during cardiac surgery. Part 1: Validation of whole-blood heparin concentration and activated clotting time. Perfusion. 2003 Sep;18(5):269-76. doi: 10.1191/0267659103pf672oa.
PMID: 14604242BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Magnus Hedström, MD
Heart Centre, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2017
First Posted
June 29, 2017
Study Start
April 18, 2017
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share