NCT03196596

Brief Summary

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement and is projected to be the preferred treatment modality. As patient selection and operator experience have improved, it is hypothesised that device-host interactions will play a more dominant role in outcome. This, in combination with the increasing number of valve types and sizes, confronts the physician with the dilemma to choose the valve that best fits the individual patient. This necessitates the availability of pre-procedural computer simulation that is based upon the integration of the patient-specific anatomy, the physical and (bio)mechanical properties of the valve and recipient anatomy derived from in-vitro experiments. Patient-specific computer simulation may improve outcome of TAVI by proposing the valve size that best fits the individual patient. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of patient-specific computer simulation in valve size selection.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Geographic Reach
5 countries

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 23, 2017

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 5, 2017

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 23, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 8, 2019

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

TAVIComputer simulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Decision 1- Valve size decision based on pre TAVI MSCT

    Valve size decision based on pre TAVI Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT), which is performed in all patients referred for TAVI in accordance to clinical routine, during the heart team meeting

    an average of 2 days before TAVI, before TAVI and computer simulation

  • Decision 2- Valve size decision after knowledge of the computer simulation results

    Valve size decision after availability of the results of computer simulation

    an average of 1 day before TAVI, before TAVI but after computer simulation

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Decision 3- Change of initial valve size decision during TAVI

    an average of 5 minutes after TAVI, directly after TAVI

  • Decision 3- Change of initial depth of implantation strategy during TAVI

    an average of 5 minutes after TAVI, directly after TAVI

  • Depth of implantation target

    an average of 2 days before TAVI, before TAVI and computer simulation

  • Depth of implantation target 2

    an average of 1 day before TAVI, before TAVI but after computer simulation

  • Aortic regurgitation

    an average of 4 days after TAVI, at hospital discharge

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Computer simulation

Patients in whom a computer simulation model will be obtained based on pre procedural CT

Other: Computer simulation

Prospective compare group

Patients in whom no computer simulation model will be obtained

Interventions

In these patients, a computer simulation model will be obtained based on pre procedural CT

Computer simulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with native severe aortic valve stenosis accepted for TAVI with the self-expanding Evolut R Valve by the local heart team

You may qualify if:

  • Native severe aortic valve stenosis
  • Planned for TAVI with the Evolut R Valve

You may not qualify if:

  • Bicuspid aortic valve
  • Extensive subannular calcifications
  • Non-transfemoral access
  • Poor CT quality
  • Lack of written informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Edegem, 2650, Belgium

Location

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Location

University Hospital Cologne-Heart Center

Cologne, 50937, Germany

Location

Ospedale di San Raffaele

Milan, 20132, Italy

Location

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CE, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Schultz C, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Lefevre T, De Santis G, Bruining N, Collas V, Dezutter T, Bosmans B, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Watanabe Y, Segers P, Verhegghe B, Chevalier B, van Mieghem N, De Beule M, Mortier P, de Jaegere P. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for theprediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. 2016 Jan 22;11(9):1044-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I9A212.

    PMID: 26788707BACKGROUND
  • de Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Bruining N, Dezutter T, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Collas V, Bosmans B, Verhegghe B, Ren C, Geleinse M, Schultz C, van Mieghem N, De Beule M, Mortier P. Patient-Specific Computer Modeling to Predict Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.003. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26965945BACKGROUND
  • El Faquir N, Ren B, Van Mieghem NM, Bosmans J, de Jaegere PP. Patient-specific computer modelling - its role in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Neth Heart J. 2017 Feb;25(2):100-105. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0923-6.

    PMID: 27888494BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic Valve DiseaseHeart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVentricular Outflow Obstruction

Study Officials

  • Peter PT de Jaegere, MD, PhD

    Erasmus Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD, Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2017

First Posted

June 23, 2017

Study Start

May 23, 2017

Primary Completion

January 8, 2019

Study Completion

January 31, 2019

Last Updated

February 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations