Added Value of Patient-specific Computer Simulation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
TAVIguide
The Value of Patient-specific Computer Simulation in the Planning of TAVI With the Self-expanding Evolut R Valve
1 other identifier
observational
80
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at increased risk for surgical aortic valve replacement and is projected to be the preferred treatment modality. As patient selection and operator experience have improved, it is hypothesised that device-host interactions will play a more dominant role in outcome. This, in combination with the increasing number of valve types and sizes, confronts the physician with the dilemma to choose the valve that best fits the individual patient. This necessitates the availability of pre-procedural computer simulation that is based upon the integration of the patient-specific anatomy, the physical and (bio)mechanical properties of the valve and recipient anatomy derived from in-vitro experiments. Patient-specific computer simulation may improve outcome of TAVI by proposing the valve size that best fits the individual patient. The aim of this study is to assess the added value of patient-specific computer simulation in valve size selection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2017
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2019
CompletedFebruary 6, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.6 years
June 5, 2017
February 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Decision 1- Valve size decision based on pre TAVI MSCT
Valve size decision based on pre TAVI Multislice Computed Tomography (MSCT), which is performed in all patients referred for TAVI in accordance to clinical routine, during the heart team meeting
an average of 2 days before TAVI, before TAVI and computer simulation
Decision 2- Valve size decision after knowledge of the computer simulation results
Valve size decision after availability of the results of computer simulation
an average of 1 day before TAVI, before TAVI but after computer simulation
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Decision 3- Change of initial valve size decision during TAVI
an average of 5 minutes after TAVI, directly after TAVI
Decision 3- Change of initial depth of implantation strategy during TAVI
an average of 5 minutes after TAVI, directly after TAVI
Depth of implantation target
an average of 2 days before TAVI, before TAVI and computer simulation
Depth of implantation target 2
an average of 1 day before TAVI, before TAVI but after computer simulation
Aortic regurgitation
an average of 4 days after TAVI, at hospital discharge
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Computer simulation
Patients in whom a computer simulation model will be obtained based on pre procedural CT
Prospective compare group
Patients in whom no computer simulation model will be obtained
Interventions
In these patients, a computer simulation model will be obtained based on pre procedural CT
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with native severe aortic valve stenosis accepted for TAVI with the self-expanding Evolut R Valve by the local heart team
You may qualify if:
- Native severe aortic valve stenosis
- Planned for TAVI with the Evolut R Valve
You may not qualify if:
- Bicuspid aortic valve
- Extensive subannular calcifications
- Non-transfemoral access
- Poor CT quality
- Lack of written informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Centerlead
- Feopscollaborator
- Cardialysis B.V.collaborator
Study Sites (5)
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, 2650, Belgium
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
University Hospital Cologne-Heart Center
Cologne, 50937, Germany
Ospedale di San Raffaele
Milan, 20132, Italy
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CE, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Schultz C, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Lefevre T, De Santis G, Bruining N, Collas V, Dezutter T, Bosmans B, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Watanabe Y, Segers P, Verhegghe B, Chevalier B, van Mieghem N, De Beule M, Mortier P, de Jaegere P. Patient-specific image-based computer simulation for theprediction of valve morphology and calcium displacement after TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve and the Edwards SAPIEN valve. EuroIntervention. 2016 Jan 22;11(9):1044-52. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I9A212.
PMID: 26788707BACKGROUNDde Jaegere P, De Santis G, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Bosmans J, Bruining N, Dezutter T, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Collas V, Bosmans B, Verhegghe B, Ren C, Geleinse M, Schultz C, van Mieghem N, De Beule M, Mortier P. Patient-Specific Computer Modeling to Predict Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.01.003. No abstract available.
PMID: 26965945BACKGROUNDEl Faquir N, Ren B, Van Mieghem NM, Bosmans J, de Jaegere PP. Patient-specific computer modelling - its role in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Neth Heart J. 2017 Feb;25(2):100-105. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0923-6.
PMID: 27888494BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter PT de Jaegere, MD, PhD
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD, Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2017
First Posted
June 23, 2017
Study Start
May 23, 2017
Primary Completion
January 8, 2019
Study Completion
January 31, 2019
Last Updated
February 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share