Safety and Efficacy Comparison Of Two TAVI Systems in a Prospective Randomized Evaluation II
SCOPE II
1 other identifier
observational
796
6 countries
23
Brief Summary
Current care randomized clinical trial comparing the CE marked Symetis ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE TF™ Transfemoral Delivery System with the CE marked Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R TAVI system (or any future CE-marked CoreValve versions).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2017
Typical duration for all trials
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 4, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
June 1, 2020
3.1 years
March 30, 2017
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite of all-cause mortality or stroke rates
The primary objective is to compare the composite of all-cause mortality or stroke rates at 1 year (powered for non-inferiority).
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (37)
New permanent pacemaker rate
30 days
All cause mortality at 30 days
30 days
Stroke at 30 days
30 days
Valve malpositioning at 30 days
30 days
Peri-procedural myocardial infarction at 30 days
30 days
- +32 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Symetis ACURATE neo™ transfemoral TAVI system
Patient assigned to this group will be implanted with Symetis ACURATE neo™ transfemoral TAVI system.
Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R TAVI System
Patient assigned to this group will be implanted with Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) System.
Interventions
Symetis ACURATE neo™ transfemoral TAVI system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to mitigate paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Symetis SA, Ecublens, Switzerland).
Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) System (or any future CE-marked Corevalve versions): The support frame is manufactured from nitinol, which has multilevel, self-expanding properties and is radiopaque. The bioprosthesis is manufactured by suturing valve leaflets and a skirt from porcine pericardium into a tri-leaflet configuration (manufactured by Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Santa Ana, USA).
Eligibility Criteria
764 patients presenting with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with the indication for TAVI, as agreed by the Heart Team. If all eligibility criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are fulfilled, patients will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the Symetis ACURATE neo™ or the Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R (or any future CE-marked CoreValve versions) by permuted block randomization.
You may qualify if:
- Patient with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis defined by a mean aortic gradient \> 40 mmHg or peak jet velocity \> 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) \< 1cm2 or AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) of \<0.6 cm2/m2
- Patient is symptomatic (heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class \> I, angina or syncope)
- Patients are considered at high risk for mortality with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement as assessed by a Heart Team consisting of a cardiologist and surgeon or as confirmed by a logistic EuroSCORE I \> 20% and / or STS score \> 10%.
- Aortic annulus diameter ranging from 21 to 26mm and perimeter rage from 66 - 81.7mm , based on ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomographic measurements. Findings of TTE, TEE and conventional aortography should be integrated in the anatomic assessment.
- Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis suitable for transfemoral access as assessed by conventional angiography and/or multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (access vessel diameter ≥ 6mm)
- Patient understands the purpose, the potential risks as well as benefits of the trial and is willing to participate in all parts of the follow-up
- Patient age 75 years or older
- Patient has given written consent to participate in the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Severely reduced left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction \<20%)
- Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in aortic and/or mitral position
- Participation in another trial, which would lead to deviations in the preparation or performance of the intervention or the post-implantation management from this protocol
- Severe coagulation conditions
- Inability to tolerate anticoagulation therapy
- Contraindication to contrast media or allergy to nitinol
- Active infection, including endocarditis
- Congenital aortic stenosis or unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve
- Non-valvular aortic stenosis
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- New or untreated echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
- Non-calcific acquired aortic stenosis
- Severe eccentricity of calcification
- Anatomy not appropriate for transfemoral implant due to size, disease and degree of calcification or tortuosity of the aorta or ilio-femoral arteries
- Severe mitral regurgitation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ceric Sàrllead
- Symetis SAcollaborator
Study Sites (23)
Heart Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
CHRU Brest Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29200, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille
Lille, 59037, France
Hôpital Jacques Cartier
Massy, 91300, France
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076, France
University Hospital Aachen
Aachen, 52074, Germany
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
Berlin, 13353, Germany
Herzzentrum Brandenburg, Immanuel Klinikum Bernau
Bernau bei Berlin, 16321, Germany
St.-Johannes-Hospital
Dortmund, 44137, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen
Essen, 45138, Germany
Goethe-University Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60323, Germany
Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universitätsklinik
Leipzig, 04289, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum München des Freistaates Bayern
Munich, 80636, Germany
Klinik für Herz- & Kreislauferkrankungen - Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Munich, 80636, Germany
University of Catania, Ferrarotto Hospital
Catania, 95124, Italy
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano- (MI), 20089, Italy
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
San Donato, 20097, Italy
Ospedale San Raffaele
San Raffaele, 20132, Italy
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
Brighton and sussex University hospital NHS trust
Brighton, England, BN25BE, United Kingdom
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TRUST
Leeds, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Tamburino C, Bleiziffer S, Thiele H, Scholtz S, Hildick-Smith D, Cunnington M, Wolf A, Barbanti M, Tchetche D, Garot P, Pagnotta P, Gilard M, Bedogni F, Van Belle E, Vasa-Nicotera M, Chieffo A, Deutsch O, Kempfert J, Sondergaard L, Butter C, Trillo-Nouche R, Lotfi S, Mollmann H, Joner M, Abdel-Wahab M, Bogaerts K, Hengstenberg C, Capodanno D. Comparison of Self-Expanding Bioprostheses for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: SCOPE 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2020 Dec 22;142(25):2431-2442. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051547. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
PMID: 33054367DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Corrado Tamburino, Prof, MD, PhD
Cardiology Division and Cardio-Thoracic & Vascular Department, Ferrarotto & Policlinico Hospitals, University of Catania, Italy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sabine Bleiziffer, MD
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2017
First Posted
June 20, 2017
Study Start
April 20, 2017
Primary Completion
June 4, 2020
Study Completion
June 4, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share