Investigation of the Role of Pictorial Asthma Action Plans to Promote Self-management in Rural Youth With Asthma
TAAC
Take Action for Asthma Control Study - Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Pictorial Asthma Action Plans to Promote Self-management and Health in Rural Youth With Asthma
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the potential benefit of Pictorial versus Written Asthma Action Plans (AAPs) to support asthma management among young people with persistent asthma. Participants will be randomly allocated to the Pictorial or Written AAP group and followed up over a 6-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected from young people, parents and clinical teams involved in recruitment to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the Pictorial AAP (PAAP) software developed for this study, the PAAPs produced by the software, and the study procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable asthma
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 12, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 22, 2021
CompletedOctober 22, 2021
October 1, 2021
1.5 years
June 7, 2017
October 8, 2020
October 20, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
The Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview (AAPKI)-Child
The Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview (AAPKI) was developed for the purposes of this study. The first section of the structured interview included 8 items describing hypothetical situations in which the respondent was asked to categorize themselves or their child into one of three zones. These items were scored as correct (1) or incorrect (0). Two items were excluded because they were not relevant to all participants. The second section of the structured interview included 3 open response items asking the respondent to describe the treatment instructions for the three zones according to the AAP. Responses were coded on a 4-point scale: 0 = incorrect; 1 = possibly correct, but vague or missing important details; 2 = correct but not detailed; 3 = correct and specific. Percent correct knowledge scores were calculated using six items from the first section and the three additional questions about treatment, for a total of nine questions.
Measured at three time points over 6 months; baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
The Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview (AAPKI)-Parent
The Asthma Action Plan Knowledge Interview (AAPKI) was developed for the purposes of this study. The first section of the structured interview included 8 items describing hypothetical situations in which the respondent was asked to categorize their child into one of three zones. These items were scored as correct (1) or incorrect (0). Two items were excluded because they were not relevant to all participants. The second section of the structured interview included 3 open response items asking the respondent to describe the treatment instructions for the three zones according to the AAP. Responses were coded on a 4-point scale: 0 = incorrect; 1 = possibly correct, but vague or missing important details; 2 = correct but not detailed; 3 = correct and specific. Percent correct knowledge scores were calculated using six items from the first section and the three additional questions about treatment, for a total of nine questions.
Measured at three time points over 6 months; baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
Asthma Control Test
Asthma control was measures via the Asthma Control Test (ACT) 12 for participants 12 and older (7 items), and the ACT 11 for participants 11 and younger (5 items). These scales include a 5 point Likert type response. Total score is calculated by summing response with higher scores indicating more control. Possible range of scores is 0-35. The raw scores were dichotomized for a clinical cut-off, with a score of 19 and less considered "poor control".
Measured at four time points over 6 months; baseline, 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
Adherence to Daily Controller Inhaler
Adherence to daily controller inhaler measured objectively using an electronic monitor attached to the inhaler and connected to a smart phone application or 'hub' in the participant's home.Data was examined for daily percent adherence by comparing the number of puffs taken with the number of puffs prescribed. Day 180 was not included in the analyses due to low insufficient group size.
Measured over 6 months; day 1, day 30, day 90 and day 180
Lung Function-FEV1
Lung function was assessed using spirometry outcome of Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1),
Measured at three time points over 6 months; baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
Lung Function- FEF 25-75
This data is gathered from a spirometry test. FEF 25-75 is the air flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity.
Measured at three time points over 6 months; baseline, 3- and 6-month follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Satisfaction With Asthma Action Plan-Caregiver
Measured at two time points over 6 months; 1- and 6-month follow-up.
Satisfaction With Asthma Action Plan-Patient
Measured at two time points over 6 months; 1- and 6-month follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
Pictorial Asthma Action Plan
EXPERIMENTALYoung people in the Pictorial Asthma Action Plan (PAAP) arm will receive a PAAP generated by their asthma provider using a software program developed for the study. The PAAP will be personalized according to the young person's gender, race, favorite sport/activity, provider's gender, provider's clinic contact details, and hospital in emergency situations. The PAAP contains minimal text, instead illustrating each participant's asthma regimen using pictures, such as color-coded daily controller and rescue inhalers. Each participant will receive multiple copies of their PAAP, after receiving a brief education session with their provider, outlining the treatment summarized in the PAAP.
Written Asthma Action Plan
ACTIVE COMPARATORYoung people in the Written Asthma Action Plan (WAAP) arm will receive a WAAP generated by their asthma provider using using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) template. The WAAP will be personalized according to the young person's treatment plan. Each participant will receive multiple copies of their WAAP, after receiving a brief education session with their provider, outlining the treatment summarized in the WAAP.
Interventions
Participants will receive a PAAP plan, personalized to their asthma treatment. Each participant will take part in a brief education session during which their asthma provider will outline the treatment plan summarized in their PAAP.
Participants will receive a WAAP plan, personalized to their asthma treatment. Each participant will take part in a brief education session during which their asthma provider will outline the treatment plan summarized in their WAAP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 8-17 years
- new patient (to clinic) with a diagnosis of persistent asthma or an established patient with uncontrolled persistent asthma and a clinical need for a new treatment regimen
- no history of having received a written AAP
- prescribed an inhaled corticosteroid (i.e., daily controller medication).
You may not qualify if:
- patients and caregivers who do not use English as their primary language
- has a significant developmental (e.g., autism, intellectual disability) or sensory (e.g., blindness) disorder that would preclude completion of study measures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
WVU Medicine
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26501, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Christina Duncan
- Organization
- West Virginia University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christina Duncan, PhD
West Virginia University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
May 24, 2017
Primary Completion
November 12, 2018
Study Completion
November 12, 2018
Last Updated
October 22, 2021
Results First Posted
October 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share