POPQ Versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair During Vaginal Reconstruction
Preoperative POPQ Versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension
1 other identifier
interventional
335
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the Preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE) trial is to compare surgical outcomes of POPQ-based surgery with simulated apical support-based surgery for anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse at the time of transvaginal apical suspension.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedMay 27, 2022
May 1, 2022
5.3 years
June 9, 2017
May 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical success at 2 years after surgery
surgical success is defined as the absence of all of the following criteria: (1) anterior or posterior vaginal descent beyond the hymen (i.e., point Ba or Bp \>0); (2) descent of the vaginal apex beyond the half-way point of vagina (i.e., point C \> -1/2×total vaginal length); (3) vaginal bulge symptoms; (4) re-treatment for prolapse by either surgery or pessary.
From date of surgery until the date of first documented failure, assessed up to 2 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Rate of anterior or posterior colporrhaphy
At date of surgery
Change of POPQ values
From baseline to 2 years after surgery
Change of PFDI-20 scores
From baseline to 2 years after surgery
Change of pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ-7) scores
From baseline to 2 years after surgery
Change of Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ)-12 scores
From baseline to 2 years after surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
POPQ-based surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORwill undergo anterior or posterior colporrhaphy for all of anterior or posterior vaginal prolapse stage 2 or greater (i.e. point Ba or Bp ≥-1 on the POPQ examination)
Simulated apical support-based surgery
EXPERIMENTALwill undergo anterior or posterior colporrhaphy only for the prolapse unresolved under simulated apical support (i.e. point Ba or Bp ≥-1 under simulated apical support)
Interventions
will be performed in a traditional manner with midline plication of the fibromuscular layer using 2-0 delayed absorbable sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- POPQ stage 2-4 prolapse
- Descent of vaginal apex or cervix at least ½ way into vaginal canal (i.e. POPQ point C ≥ -TVL/2)
- Correction of either anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse under simulated apical support (i.e. from stage 2 or greater to stage 0 or 1)
- Vaginal bulge symptoms (i.e. an affirmative response to the question 3 from the PFDI-20)
- Vaginal reconstructive surgery is planned, including a vaginal apical suspension procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Large pelvic mass
- Previous prolapse surgery
- Known malignancy
- Two or more inpatient hospitalizations for medical comorbidities in the previous year
- Subject wishes to retain her uterus
- Subject is unable and unwilling to participate in
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Myung Jae, Jeon
Seoul, 03080, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Jeon MJ, Kim CH, Cho HH, Suh DH, Kim SR. Preoperative POPQ versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e034170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034170.
PMID: 31911524DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Myung Jae Jeon, MD, PhD
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2017
First Posted
June 14, 2017
Study Start
June 20, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
May 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05