Efficacy Transverse Abdominal Plane (TAP) Block Renal Transplant Surgery
Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Transverse Abdominal Plane Block for Analgesia in Renal Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transverse abdominal plane block in patients undergoing renal transplant surgery.Adult renal transplant recipients will be prospectively randomized to receive a standard general anesthetic technique supplemented with ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL TAP block or sham block with 20 mL 0.9% saline. Both groups will receive patient-controlled morphine analgesia. Patient assessment will occur in the postanesthetic care unit and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours. The primary outcome is total morphine consumption in the first 24 hours after renal transplantation. Other outcomes asses include pain scores, presence of nausea or vomiting, excessive sedation, and respiratory depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJune 8, 2017
June 1, 2017
3 months
June 3, 2017
June 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Morphine Consumption
Patient Control Analgesia: morphine sulfate 2 mg IV every 5 minutes until visual analog scale pain score (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain) is 3 or less, and continued at the following settings for a 24-hour period: 1 mg bolus, 7-minute lockout, and 30 mg maximum 4-hourly dose.
24 hours post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score
24 hours post-operative
Study Arms (2)
TAP Block
EXPERIMENTALThe TAP block will be performed under general anesthesia, according to the technique described below: * The patient will be placed supine with the abdomen exposed between the iliac crest and the costal margin * After skin antisepsis, a high-frequency ultrasound transducer will be placed transversely across the anterior axillary line above the iliac crest * In this region, the abdominal musculature (external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdomen) is identified, and the transverse abdominal plane of the abdomen * The needle (BD-A-50mm) will be inserted in the technique "in plane" to the region of the transverse plane of the abdomen, where the solution will be administered. * In this group, will be administered 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine
Saline Group
SHAM COMPARATORThe block will be performed under general anesthesia, according to the technique described below: * The patient will be placed supine with the abdomen exposed between the iliac crest and the costal margin * After skin antisepsis, a high-frequency ultrasound transducer will be placed transversely across the anterior axillary line above the iliac crest * In this region, the abdominal musculature (external oblique, internal oblique and transverse abdomen) is identified, and the transverse abdominal plane of the abdomen * The needle (BD-A-50mm) will be inserted in the technique "in plane" to the region of the transverse plane of the abdomen, where the solution will be administered. * In this group, will be administered 20 mL of Saline
Interventions
It will be performed a ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block with 20 ml of 0.375% of ropivacaine for patients submitted to renal transplantation
t will be performed a ultrasound-guided transverse abdominal plane block with 2o mL of saline for patients submitted to renal transplantation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- end-stage renal disease undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to the use of morphine
- Contraindications to the use ropivacaine
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Inability to use a Patient Control Analgesia device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital do Rim e Hipertensao
São Paulo, 04038-002, Brazil
Related Publications (8)
Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011 Jun 25;377(9784):2215-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60245-6.
PMID: 21704871RESULTDean M. Opioids in renal failure and dialysis patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Nov;28(5):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.02.021.
PMID: 15504625RESULTFinnerty O, Carney J, McDonnell JG. Trunk blocks for abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65 Suppl 1:76-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06203.x.
PMID: 20377549RESULTMcDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG. Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.03.011.
PMID: 17961838RESULTRafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11576144RESULTWarman P, Nicholls B. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks: efficacy and safety. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Sep;23(3):313-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2009.02.004.
PMID: 19862890RESULTNiraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PMID: 19561014RESULTMukhtar K, Khattak I. Transversus abdominis plane block for renal transplant recipients. Br J Anaesth. 2010 May;104(5):663-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq077. No abstract available.
PMID: 20400617RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leonardo HC Ferraro, Professor
Federal University of São Paulo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2017
First Posted
June 8, 2017
Study Start
June 3, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share