Comparison of Different Desensitizers in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
Comparison of Fluoride Varnish With Two Different Desensitizers in Reducing Dentinal Hypersensitivity
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single center, randomized control. Sixty eligible subjects will be recruited into 3 study treatment groups (n=20 per group) through computerized randomization. Subjects in group 1 will be treated with 8% arginine containing paste(Colgate® Sensitive Pro-Relief™), group 2 with 5% topical fluoride varnish (Acclean) and group 3 with self-adhesive resin (Seal and protect, Dentsply). The subjects in the study will be evaluated for tactile and air-blast hypersensitivity criteria at baseline, two and four weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 20, 2018
CompletedJune 29, 2018
June 1, 2018
1.6 years
May 31, 2017
June 28, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction of hypersensitivity
• Investigators are comparing the effectiveness of three professionally applied desensitizing agents, 8% arginine containing paste (Colgate® Sensitive Pro-Relief™), 5% fluoride varnish (Acclean) and self-adhesive resin (Seal and Protect, Dentsply) in reducing the dentine hypersensitivity immediately after application and at 2 and 4 weeks follow-up.The measurements of sensitivity will be determined by patient's response to air blast stimuli. Subjective responses will be recorded using Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale which is scored as follows: 0 Subject does not respond to air stimulus, 1. Subject responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus 2. Subject responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus 3. Subject responds to air stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus
Reduction of hypersensitivity will be assessed at 2 weeks and 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Fluoride Varnish Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR5% fluoride varnish (Acclean) applied topically
Arginine paste Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8% arginine containing paste (Colgate® Sensitive Pro-Relief™) applied topically
Adhesive Resin Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSelf-adhesive resin (Seal and Protect, Dentsply) applied topically
Interventions
Applied topically as a coating at single point in time
Applied topically as a coating at single point in time
Applied topically as a coating at single point in time and light cured for 20 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with age 18 and above with dentine hypersensitivity will be selected.
- At least two hypersensitive teeth which will be sensitive to air blast (Schiff air sensitivity scores of 2 or 3) and positive tactile sensitivity assessed clinically with explorer
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who would have undergone any periodontal procedure or gotten any professionally applied desensitizers in the last three months.
- Patients having generalized sensitivity in all teeth
- Chronic use of anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications
- Pregnant or lactating females;
- Any denture bridgework; active cervical caries or deep abrasion requiring Class V fillings;
- Fractured, crowned or root filled teeth and teeth with large restorations
- Carious teeth or cracked teeth assessed on the basis of clinical judgment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 74800, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad Hasan Hameed, BDS
Aga Khan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2017
First Posted
June 6, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2017
Primary Completion
December 20, 2018
Study Completion
December 20, 2018
Last Updated
June 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share