Comparing Approaches to Treat Older Adult Women's Urge Incontinence: Pilot Feasibility and Randomized Controlled Trial
SHUW
Comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction With the Health Enhancement Program in the Treatment of Urinary Urge Incontinence in Older Adult Women: A Pilot Feasibility and Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of conducting a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based stress reduction with the health enhancement program on symptoms of urinary urge incontinence in older adult women, and to establish preliminary efficacy of these two approaches on symptoms of urinary urge incontinence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 12, 2018
CompletedFebruary 15, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.2 years
April 27, 2017
February 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Number of potential participants contacted
number of people who contacted PI during recruitment process, including the place they heard about the study
10 weeks
number of enrolled participants completing the study
number of participants who attended at least five of nine classes number of excused absences number of unexcused absences
12 weeks
percentage of course content delivered during intervention
weekly interventionist report on what was taught participants perception of course content delivered measured by a checklist of concepts covered in the weekly interventions at study completion
44 weeks
positive or negative coded responses to the question "How did it go today?"
data coded from two participants' responses after each class in each arm
8 weeks
number of participants who completed each week's homework practice
participants mark on homework practice log and submit weekly
8 weeks
number of participants recruited for enrollment
potential participants who were interested in the study
10 weeks
number of potential participants who are eligible to enroll
number of people who passed the screening process via calls or emails
10 weeks
consent rate
number of participants who are willing to sign consent document at enrollment interview; number who pass the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and are willing to sign consent document
10 weeks
number of participants enrolled
number of people who enrolled into the study
10 weeks
number of dropouts due to stated distress from or dislike of either intervention experience (as opposed to someone needing to withdraw due to a family emergency or illness)
participant self-report of what made the intervention challenging - why they were unable or unwilling to complete the course
8 weeks
- number of minutes of homework practice each week
totaled from daily numbers reported by participant
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
change in symptom severity
16 weeks, 6 months
change in symptom bother
16 weeks, 6 months
change in perceived stress
16 weeks, 6 months
change in perceived self-efficacy
16 weeks, 6 months
self report of rate and trajectory of change in participant impression of improvement
16 weeks, 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction
EXPERIMENTAL8 week manualized, standardized mindfulness-based stress reduction program taught by a certified Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction instructor
Health Enhancement Program
ACTIVE COMPARATOR8 week manualized, standardized health enhancement program, taught by a certified health education specialist
Interventions
This experimental arm presents the actual Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program as developed in the late seventies and early eighties in its original eight week format
This active comparison arm presents the official Health Enhancement Program in its eight week format as developed by MacCoon in 2009.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The following eligibility criteria must be met for the potential participant to be considered for enrollment.
- The study is enrolling older adult women, with urinary urge incontinence.
- They cannot be currently treating their urinary urge incontinence with medication as this will confound results.
- Women who have attempted more extreme treatments and are still experiencing urinary urge incontinence will not be considered as potential participants, as it is unlikely that mindfulness-based stress reduction would treat urinary urge incontinence that is refractory to that degree.
- Participants must be English speaking, as the interventions and homework will be delivered in English.
- postmenopausal women
- Urge predominant urinary incontinence, defined as score of ≥ 3 (moderate to severe urinary incontinence) on the Incontinence Severity Index
- Urge predominant urinary incontinence as determined by question 3 on the 3 Incontinence Questions. The 3 Incontinence Questions has been shown to be a quick and accurate way of diagnosing stress, urge or mixed incontinence in most cases
- Has experienced urinary urge incontinence symptoms for at least three months
- Committed to attend 8 weekly sessions and one half day retreat between weeks 6 and 7
- No pharmacologic therapy for urinary urge incontinence within three weeks of enrollment and no plan to initiate such medications during the 8 week active treatment
- If on hormone therapy or vaginal estrogen, plan to remain on it for the duration of the study; if not on it, no plan to initiate
- No previous intradetrusor Botox injection for urinary urge incontinence and no plan to receive it during the intervention
- No previous neurostimulation for urinary urge incontinence and no plan to receive it during the intervention English speaking
- A score of \>24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
You may not qualify if:
- Predominantly stress, mixed, or other type of incontinence as determined by question 3 on the 3 Incontinence Questions
- Currently taking medications for Alzheimer's disease or other dementias; these medications could interfere with their participation
- Known neurologic disease acknowledged to impact bladder function including Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, or stroke affecting urinary control; these diseases provide cause for urinary urge incontinence and as such the participant would be unlikely to benefit from the intervention
- Current symptomatic urinary tract infection that has not resolved prior to the start of intervention
- Current bladder infection that has not resolved prior to the start of intervention
- Use of an assistive device for ambulation (such as a cane, walker, or wheelchair) and feels that difficulties with bladder management are related to the slowed time in visiting the restroom ("Was urinary urge incontinence a problem before you began using the assistive device?")
- Functionally incontinent, in other words, having a mental or physical condition that prevents a person from visiting the restroom in time
- Ever diagnosed with interstitial cystitis
- Self-report of vaginal bulge protruding outside of the vagina
- Past participation in a formal program of mindfulness-based stress reduction
- Substantial, uncorrected hearing loss
- Substantial, uncorrected vision loss
- Limitations that preclude completing study questionnaires or surveys, such as difficulties with reading and writing or a cognitive impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katarina F Felsted, MS
University of Utah
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This is a blinded, randomized controlled trial. Participants are blinded to condition.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2017
First Posted
June 6, 2017
Study Start
February 3, 2017
Primary Completion
April 12, 2018
Study Completion
April 12, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share