Feasibility and Efficacy of Assisstive Tactile and Auditory Communicating Devices
VIS4ION
Feasibility and Efficacy of the VIS4ION Platform and Assistive Tactile and Auditory Communicating Devices in Low Vision Subjects
1 other identifier
interventional
120
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
This pilot study will integrate multi-sensor fusion techniques (software) to effectively combine information obtained from the newly embedded infrared, ultrasound, and stereo-camera-based sensor systems (hardware) that are implemented into the VIS4ION platform. The core of this technology is based on 4 components: (1) a wearable vest with several distinct range and image sensors embedded. These sensors extract pertinent information about obstacles and the environment, which are conveyed to (2) a haptic interface (belt) that communicates this spatial information to the end-user in real-time via an intuitive, ergonomic and personalized vibrotactile re-display along the torso. (3) A smartphone serves as a connectivity gateway and coordinates the core components through WiFi, bluetooth, and/or 4G LTE, (4) a headset that contains both binaural, open-ear, bone conduction speakers (leaving the ear canal patent for ambient sounds) and a microphone for oral communication-based voice recognition during use of a virtual personal assistant (VPA). Blindfolded-sighted, and blind subjects in a real-world, combined obstacle avoidance / navigation task will serve as an independent measure of overall improvements in the system as well as a roadmap for future avenues to enhance performance. Further, a prospective, randomized crossover, controlled, non-blinded phase will be conducted in Thailand as part of this study to compare and evaluate effectiveness of the wearable vest for increasing navigation and quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 23, 2024
CompletedMay 30, 2025
May 1, 2025
5.9 years
May 30, 2017
May 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of Correct Responses by Feedback Devices
Assessment of ability of the feedback devices (vibrating belt- wrist band/haptic interface and audio output/open-ear headset) to provide correct responses on alternative force choice tasks during simulation experiments.
Month 6
Total Time to Complete Activities of Daily Living
Such activities can include navigation, shopping and cooking.
Month 6
Path Length
Total length of the path taken when participants perform navigation task.
Month 6
Success Rate
Percentage of participants who achieve the destination and/or target in the navigation task.
Month 6
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Score
Baseline, Month 6
Change in World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Score
Baseline, Month 6
Change in Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (VFQ-25) Score
Baseline, Month 6
Study Arms (4)
Visually impaired
EXPERIMENTALVisually impaired subjects will provide continuity across iterations of the testing, allowing for direct comparisons of responses within an individual for a single behavioral measure across different iterations of the device architecture and output configuration.
Healthy controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealthy (naive) subjects invaluable insights as well as a range of body types, cognitive abilities, and other idiosyncrasies that will keep our design and testing process from tailoring the device to a small set of individuals rather than the broader population.
Thailand Site - Group A: Assistive Mode then Passive Mode
EXPERIMENTALDuring the first 15 days, group A will go through an assistive mode and then a passive mode for the next 15 days
Thailand Site - Group B: Passive Mode then Assistive Mode
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B will go through a passive mode for the first 15 days and then an assistive mode for the second half of the month
Interventions
Used to examine human localization and identification performance. Object battery will include: trip hazards ('pucks' with various height/width combinations to represent children's toys, street debris, rocks, pets, etc.), furniture (chairs, desks, couches, benches), people, walls, and corridors. Objects will be recorded by placing them to the right or left on the path-of-travel. Raw sensor outputs for single obstacles and walls in isolation (trip-hazard pucks with 8 heights, chair, desk, person, wall) and the same set of single obstacles against a wall. This set of 23 raw sensor traces can be used in various combinations (e.g., encountering a curb and then a person, or a chair) to create a training sequence that will help experimentally naïve subjects to understand the correspondence between tactile stimulation and the real-world scenario it is intended to depict.
When in "Assistive Mode," participants will navigate campus while receiving navigation assistance (acquiring data and simultaneously providing assistance/audio feedback). When in "Passive Mode," participants will navigate campus wearing the backpack without receiving navigation assistant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- People with visual impairments of all different levels and etiologies.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant cognitive dysfunction (score \<24 on Folsteins' Mini Mental Status Examination)
- Previous neurological illness, complicated medical condition;
- Significant mobility restrictions; people using walkers and wheelchairs
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
New York University School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10016, United States
Mahidol University College of Music, Engineering, Science, Religious Studies, Social Sciences and Humanities
Salaya, Thailand
Mahidol University International College
Salaya, Thailand
Ratchasuda College, Mahidol University
Salaya, Thailand
Related Publications (1)
Beheshti M, Naeimi T, Hudson TE, Feng C, Mongkolwat P, Riewpaiboon W, Seiple W, Vedanthan R, Rizzo JR. A Smart Service System for Spatial Intelligence and Onboard Navigation for Individuals with Visual Impairment (VIS4ION Thailand): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial of visually impaired students at the Ratchasuda College, Thailand. Trials. 2023 Mar 7;24(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07173-8.
PMID: 36879333DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John R Rizzo, MD
NYU Langone Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2017
First Posted
June 2, 2017
Study Start
July 26, 2017
Primary Completion
June 2, 2023
Study Completion
July 23, 2024
Last Updated
May 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05