Pain and Safety of Restylane Perlane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing the Pain and the Safety Profile Associate With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Compared to Restylane Perlane
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety in associated with injection of Restylane Perlane Lidocaine compared to Restylane Perlane using VAS scale
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 20, 2019
CompletedAugust 26, 2022
August 1, 2019
4 months
May 29, 2017
June 11, 2019
August 24, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Perlane-Lido compared to Perlane at the time of injection. VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.
At the time of injection
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Perlane Side - Restylane Perlane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection
Study Arms (2)
Restylane Perlane Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALRestylane Perlane Lidocaine will be injected into one side of the nasolabial fold at day 1
Restylane Perlane
ACTIVE COMPARATORRestylane Perlane will be injected into the opposite side of the nasolabial fold on day 1
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
- Men or women aged 20 years or older of Chinese origin.
- Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study.
- Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds (NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) of either grade 3 on both NLFs or grade 4 on both NLFs.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent filler, autologous fat, lifting threads or permanent implant below the level of the lower orbital rim.
- Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment.
- Previous tissue revitalization treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy, radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryotherapy, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment.
- Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated.
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (3)
Kaohsiung Medical University
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Reception
- Organization
- Galderma
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Q-Med AB
Galderma R&D
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 29, 2017
First Posted
June 2, 2017
Study Start
September 21, 2017
Primary Completion
January 16, 2018
Study Completion
January 16, 2018
Last Updated
August 26, 2022
Results First Posted
September 20, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share