Pain and Safety of Restylane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing Pain and Safety Profile Associated With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane With and Without Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine Hydrochloride
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety associated with injections of Restylane Lidocaine compared to Restylane using a visual analogue scale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2021
CompletedJune 1, 2023
May 1, 2023
3 months
September 22, 2016
November 4, 2020
May 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Difference in Pain (Restylane Lidocaine Side - Restylane Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Restylane-Lido compared to Restylane at the time of injection. VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.
Up to 60 minutes after Injection on Day of Treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Side - Restylane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection
Study Arms (2)
Restylane Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALRestylane Lidocaine will be injected into one side nasolabial fold on Day 1
Restylane
ACTIVE COMPARATORRestylane will be injected into the opposite side nasolabial fold on Day 1
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Men or women aged 18 years or older of Chinese origin
- Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study
- Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds(NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) of either 3 on both sides or 4 on both sides
You may not qualify if:
- Previous use of any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent facial tissue augmentation therapy or autologous fat below the level of the lower orbital rim
- Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment
- Previous tissue revitalisation treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy radiofrequency, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment
- Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated
- Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Galderma R&Dlead
Study Sites (1)
Q-Med AB
Shanghai, China
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Head of Development
- Organization
- Q-Med AB
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2016
First Posted
September 29, 2016
Study Start
February 8, 2017
Primary Completion
April 27, 2017
Study Completion
May 11, 2017
Last Updated
June 1, 2023
Results First Posted
January 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share