Study Stopped
No patients were accrued to the trial
Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized phase II study comparing microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This trial will be the first prospective comparison of these modalities for the treatment of HCC and will provide critical information regarding which local ablative modality is most appropriate for which patients. This study will also provide important information regarding quality of life and liver function changes following these two different treatment modalities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2022
CompletedJune 25, 2018
June 1, 2018
4.9 years
May 17, 2017
June 20, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to local tumor progression
The primary outcome of this trial is to prospectively determine local control rates in patients with HCC treated with MWA or SBRT. Freedom From Local Progression (FFLP) is defined as the time from randomization to local tumor progression. Tumors falling to group PD (progressive disease) would constitute local control failures. Progressive disease will be defined as at least a 20% increase in the LD (longest diameter) of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest LD recorded. Or at least a 20% increase in viable arterial enhancing disease, taking as reference the smallest LD of viable HCC since treatment started. Increases of less than 3 mm compared to the smallest LD recorded will be considered stable disease rather than PD.
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary toxicity
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Incidence of liver function worsening
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Change in FACT- Hep questionnaire score
Questionnaires will be administered pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 1, 3 ,6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months post-treatment
Overall survival time
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
Progression free survival time
Patients will be followed up to 2 years
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MWA
EXPERIMENTALMWA will typically be administered in one ablation session during which time up to 2 tumors are treated.
SBRT
EXPERIMENTALSBRT will be administered in five fractions of up to 10 Gy per fraction. SBRT will be administered 5-15 days per tumor.
Interventions
MWA will typically be administered in one ablation session during which time up to 2 tumors are treated.
SBRT will be administered in five fractions of up to 10 Gy per fraction. SBRT will be administered 5-15 days per tumor.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are eligible for this trial. HCC is defined as having at least one of the following:
- HCC diagnosed either on biopsy or based on standard imaging criteria on contrast enhanced CT or MRI (arterial enhancement with washout and pseudocapsule); or
- A discrete hepatic tumor(s) as defined by the Barcelona criteria10 for cirrhotic patients, \>1 cm with arterial hypervascularity and venous or delayed phase washout on CT or MRI
- Presentation at multidisciplinary liver tumor board to assess eligibility for either SBRT or MWA
- Patients must have 1-2 intrahepatic foci of HCC and may not be candidates for refuse hepatic resection. Patients who are on the organ wait list for (orthotopic liver transplantation) OLT will be considered for this trial as a "bridge" to transplant.
- Patients with 1 focus of HCC will be eligible if their tumor is 3.5 cm or less in greatest diameter. Patients with 2 foci of HCC will be eligible if each lesion is 3.5 cm in diameter or less and the combined diameter of both lesions is 5 cm or less.
- The foci of HCC must be in an anatomic location amendable to treatment by both MWA and SBRT.
- The patient must have an ECOG performance status of ≤ 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status is an attempt to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. The score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0 is asymptomatic and 5 is death).
- Patients must have recovered from the acute effects of prior liver-directed therapy (e.g., RT, RFA, MWA or TACE) and a minimum of 4 weeks must have passed since the last procedure and protocol therapy.
- Patients must have:
- Platelets ≥ 50,000/mm3
- Child Pugh class A liver function or class B7 (Appendix II)
- INR (international normalized ratio (for anticoagulant monitoring)) \< 1.5
- The patient must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
- The patient must be at least 18 years old
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who have received prior abdominal radiation
- Patients with 3 or more foci of HCC
- Patients whose HCC involves the local vasculature, regional lymph nodes or distant metastatic sites
- Patients with Child Pugh liver function worse than B7
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dawn Owen, M.D., Ph.D.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2017
First Posted
May 30, 2017
Study Start
May 11, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
April 1, 2022
Last Updated
June 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-06