Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Program in Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program in improving sleep quality, emotional distress, circadian rhythms, and quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer in Taiwan. Hypothesis:
- 1.The quality of life in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th month.
- 2.The quality of sleep in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th month.
- 3.The emotional distress in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th month.
- 4.The circadian rhythms in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th, and 36th month.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedJuly 28, 2025
July 1, 2025
8.6 years
May 17, 2017
July 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
baseline
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
3rd month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
6th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
12th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
24th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
36th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
baseline
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
3rd month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
6th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
12th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
24th month after recruited
Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES 18 )
using European Organization for Research and Treatment cancer QLQ-OES 18 (EORTC) to measure quality of life.
36th month after recruited
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Subjective sleep quality
baseline
Subjective sleep quality
3rd month after recruited
Subjective sleep quality
6th month after recruited
Subjective sleep quality
12th month after recruited
Subjective sleep quality
24th month after recruited
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Recurrence status
Third month (T2), sixth month (T3), twelfth month (T4), twenty-fourth month (T5), and thirty-sixth month (T6).
Nutritional status
Baseline (T1), third month (T2), sixth month (T3), twelfth month (T4), twenty-fourth month (T5), and thirty-sixth month (T6)
Survival status
Third month (T2), sixth month (T3), twelfth month (T4), twenty-fourth month (T5), and thirty-sixth month (T6).
Study Arms (2)
exercise group
EXPERIMENTALThe rehabilitation program was composed of two parts: an exercise program and a diet-teaching program. The exercise program was a 12-week home-based program that comprised moderate-intensity brisk walking for 40 min per session, with 3 sessions per week; in addition, weekly exercise counseling was provided through telephone. The diet teaching program was provided to the patients by using a diet booklet at baseline (same timing as the exercise program), and its contents were used to instruct the patients regarding dietary principles to be followed.
usual-care group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group (CG) received usual care, whereas a nurse, the manager for esophageal cancer treatment, provided routine care, conducted follow-ups, and offered information on esophageal cancer to the experimental group (EG).
Interventions
1. A 12-week regimen of home-based walking exercises, comprising walking at a moderate intensity for 40 min, three times a week, was administered along with weekly exercise counseling. After collecting pretrial measurements, we explained the participants how to perform the exercises, according to an instruction manual for the exercise regimen. The detailed instructions, provided at the hospital clinics, included the determination of activity intensity, demonstration of pulse measurement, criteria for scores of 6-20 on the Borg's rating of perceived exertion (RPE), prevention of exercise-related injuries, and conditions necessitating termination of an exercise session. Participants were instructed that the exercises would be effective only if they reached 60%-80% of the target heart rate, as determined by the Karvonen method, and 13-15 on the RPE. 2. Diet-teaching program (using dietary education booklet).
For each participant, we discussed exercise regimen-related issues and diet weekly through the telephone. For instance, we discussed whether participants' exercise fulfilled the prescribed intensity, duration, or frequency and whether the participants experienced any adverse effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with esophageal cancer who were aged ≥20 years, could communicate in either Mandarin or Taiwanese, and were not cognitively impaired were included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Taipei, 112, Taiwan
Related Publications (2)
Chen HM, Huang CS, Wu YC, Chien LI, Hsu PK. The effects of a 3-month walking and dietary education program on the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer: a 1-year follow-up randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 1;33(5):441. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09489-4.
PMID: 40312569DERIVEDChen HM, Lin YY, Wu YC, Huang CS, Hsu PK, Chien LI, Lin YJ, Huang HL. Effects of Rehabilitation Program on Quality of Life, Sleep, Rest-Activity Rhythms, Anxiety, and Depression of Patients With Esophageal Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;45(2):E582-E593. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000953.
PMID: 33813524DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hui-Mei Chen, PhD
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
YU-CHUNG WU, M.D.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 17, 2017
First Posted
May 22, 2017
Study Start
September 19, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07