Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer Catheters
CATH
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Embryo Transfer (ET) Catheters
1 other identifier
interventional
352
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Numerous published trials now document that the embryo transfer (ET) procedure has a huge impact on pregnancy and delivery rates after IVF (In Vitro Fertilization). To compare the ease of use (defined as the rate of successful atraumatic insertion) of different types of embryo transfer (ET) catheters. This prospective randomized unblinded controlled clinical trial is performed to determine if there is any difference in ease of use among 2 different catheters : Cook k-soft-5000, Cook K-JETS-551910-S. Inclusion criteria: patients \< / = 38 years of age, body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 28, at least one frozen-thawed blastocyst transferred. Exclusion criteria: ICSI (Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection)-TESE (Testicular Sperm Extraction) IVF cycles. A number of 352 consecutive women undergoing embryo transfer will be selected for this prospective, randomized controlled trial. Two protocols for endometrial preparation will be used before frozen/thawed blastocyst transfer: the modified spontaneous protocol and the oral/transdermal preparation protocol. ET will be done with patient in lithotomy position, under ultrasound guidance. No anesthesia will be used for the procedure. 176 patients will be enrolled in this trial and randomized to enter one of the two catheter group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedMarch 21, 2019
June 1, 2018
1.7 years
May 4, 2017
March 19, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prevalence of difficult transfers (Number of difficult transfers/ Total transfers)
Difficult transfers are defined as 1. for Cook k-soft-5000 catheter: advancement of the outer sheath, multiple attempts, force, required manipulation, use of a stylet or tenaculum, dilatation; 2. for Cook K-JETS-551910-S catheter: required manipulation, multiple attempts, force, the use of a stylet or tenaculum, dilatation.
through study completion, 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Inter-operator variability in prevalence of difficult transfers with the 2 catheters
through study completion, 18 months
Study Arms (2)
Catheter Cook K-Jets-551910-S
EXPERIMENTALCatheter Cook K-Jets-551910-S consists of an outer firm and an inner ultrasoft catheter. The outer guiding catheter (17 cm long) is slightly stiff, with a preshaped curve and a rounded bulb tip to help negotiate the cervical canal. It has a depth marker at 4 cm from the tip, which can be pulled back to a second marker at 5 cm. The inner catheter (23 cm long) is made of a soft material with a rounded bullet tip. In general, the inner catheter does not negotiate the cervical canal directly but rather is introduced into the uterine cavity through the outer catheter.
Catheter Cook k-soft-5000 (or K-J-SP-681710, K-J-SPPE-68171)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis catheter system consists of an outer firm and inner soft catheter. The outer guiding catheter (15,4 cm long) is straight and made of flexible material. The inner catheter (23 cm long) is made of a very soft and flexible polyurethan. The inner catheter is introduced directly through the cervix.
Interventions
On the day of ET, patient will be asked to come with full bladder. ET will be done with patient in lithotomy position. No anesthesia will be used for the procedure. Under sterile condition, vaginal parts will be cleaned with saline and draped and speculum inserted to expose cervix. Cervical mucus and cervix will be cleaned with sterile media. The Et procedure itself is standardized as far as possible amongst the participating physicians to eliminate bias.
On the day of ET, patient will be asked to come with full bladder. ET will be done with patient in lithotomy position. No anesthesia will be used for the procedure. Under sterile condition, vaginal parts will be cleaned with saline and draped and speculum inserted to expose cervix. Cervical mucus and cervix will be cleaned with sterile media. The Et procedure itself is standardized as far as possible amongst the participating physicians to eliminate bias.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 28,
- at least one frozen/thawed blastocyst
You may not qualify if:
- ICSI-TESE cycles
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Paolo Emanuele Levi Setti
Rozzano, MI, 20089, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Levi Setti PE, Cirillo F, Morenghi E, Immediata V, Caccavari V, Baggiani A, Albani E, Patrizio P. One step further: randomised single-centre trial comparing the direct and afterload techniques of embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2021 Aug 18;36(9):2484-2492. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab178.
PMID: 34323282DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paolo E Levi Setti
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2017
First Posted
May 19, 2017
Study Start
September 26, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 21, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share