NCT03156517

Brief Summary

Action tremor of the arms can be an invalidizing symptom of diseases such as Essential Tremor, Dystonic Tremor, Parkinson's disease and Multiple Sclerosis. In this study we compare the efficacy and safety of two different brain targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) that both are known to reduce action tremor of the arms. These two targets are called the VIM nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) and the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), which includes the Zona Incerta. Both targets can be reached by one lead (wirh four electrode contact). Patients that are found eligible for DBS because of severe action tremor of the arms are invited to participate. After randomization, half of them are stimulated first in the VIM for 3 months and then in the PSA for 3 months, and the other half first in the PSA and then VIM for 3 months each. Tremor severity is scored on a clinical quantitative scale at baseline and at the end of each of these two 3-month periods, and eventual side-effects are registered. The best target is then selected and after another 6 months scoring is repeated. We intend to provide robust data about whether one of the two targets is superior to the other both regarding ability to reduce tremor efficiently and to avoid or minimize side-effects, or if there is no significant difference between the two targets. We also carefully check the exact position of the active electrode contact in the brain and compare this with efficacy and safety evaluations. Long-term follow-up is planned after 3, 5, 7 and 10 years.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2014

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2017

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 3, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 5, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 27, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

TreatmentDeep Brain StimulationVIM Nucleus of the ThalamusPosterior Subthalamic AreaZona IncertaEfficacySafety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Upper extremity FTM-Tremor Rating Scale score change with VIM versus PSA-stimulation

    The difference in the change from baseline to the end of each of the two 3-month randomized cross-over periods, in tremor of the contralateral upper limb(s), as evaluated by items 5,6,10-14 and 16-21 in the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM)-score with VIM- versus PSA-stimulation.

    3 months (+/- 2 weeks) and 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after operation

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • FTM-Tremor rating Scale score changes from baseline to 1-yr (all body regions)

    1 year (+/- 4 weeks) after surgery

  • Change of patient evaluated scores at 1 year of stimulation (QUEST and VAS Global Burden Disease Burden (Tremor-burden)

    1 year (+/- 4 weeks) after surgery

  • Frequency of serious adverse events

    Comparing the two randomization periods (;at 3 and 6 months), and up to 1 year of stimulation

Study Arms (2)

Deep Brain Stimulation in VIM

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive stimulation in the VIM-nucleus of the thalamus

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep Brain Stimulation in PSA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area

Device: Deep Brain Stimulation

Interventions

Deep Brain Stimulation in PSADeep Brain Stimulation in VIM

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Min 5-yr duration chronic action tremor of upper limb(s), w/ or w/out tremor of head/neck, trunk, lower limbs, who have insufficient relief from adequate trials of recommended medications. The arm tremor must be so severe that it interferes with the patient's work performance or activities of daily living, such as drinking/eating, dressing/hygiene, and/or writing. Clinical diagnosis (according to criteria defined by the Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorders Society) include Essential Tremor, Dystonic Tremor, Cerebellar Tremor- idiopathic or secondary (to e.g.MS or SCA), or severe PD tremor (who are not eligible for DBS of the subthalamic nucleus).

You may not qualify if:

  • Brain MRI showing so marked general atrophy, or supra-tentorial white matter changes, that the safety of the procedure is affected. Co-morbidity of dementia or other severe neuropsychiatric disorder (major depression or anxiety disorder, active/recent psychosis, drug or other substance abuse). Increased risk of bleeding, cancer at advanced/not stabilized stage, other severe co-morbidity (e.g. With chronic pain, short life expectancy,). Other surgical contraindications.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oslo University Hospital

Oslo, Norway

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tremor

Interventions

Deep Brain Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DyskinesiasNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Inger Marie Skogseid, MDPhD

    Oslo University Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Both the doctor who assesses the primary outcome measures at 3 and 6 months and the participant are unaware of which of the two targets is stimulated in the two randomization periods.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Randomized allocation of half the patients to be stimulated the first 3 months in the VIM-nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) and then 3 months in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), and for the other half the first 3 months in the PSA and the next 3 months in the VIM
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant, MDPhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2017

First Posted

May 17, 2017

Study Start

April 20, 2014

Primary Completion

June 3, 2019

Study Completion

December 5, 2019

Last Updated

October 27, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations