Using PROMIS as Part of Routine Clinical Care for Racially Diverse Prostate and Bladder Cancer Patients
LCCC 1636: Using PROMIS as Part of Routine Clinical Care for Racially Diverse Prostate and Bladder Cancer Patients
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this pilot study, a total of 80 patients with prostate or bladder cancer (40 black, 40 white) will complete 3 patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys: baseline (pre-treatment), during treatment, and after treatment. The overall goal of this study is to assess whether collecting patient-reported data is feasible as part of clinical care of cancer patients, and whether these data are useful for clinicians and patients. Among these 80 patients, those who agree will also undergo a semi-structured interview to assess value of HRQOL assessment at the end of the study. Of specific interest is an evaluation of whether feasibility and perceived value differ between black and white participants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 5, 2018
CompletedNovember 4, 2019
September 1, 2019
12 months
May 15, 2017
October 31, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Feasibility of PRO assessments in a clinical setting
The feasibility of incorporating PRO assessments into the clinical setting for 80 Black and White patients undergoing treatment for bladder and prostate cancer. Feasibility is defined as at least 70% of study participants completing all three PRO assessments.
90 days post treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility of enrollment
baseline
Preferred mode of questionnaire completion
baseline through 90 days post treatment
Feasibility by cohort
baseline through 90 days post treatment
Perceived value
baseline through 90 days post treatment
Study Arms (2)
Caucasian
This cohort will consist of 40 white patients who are receiving either radiation or surgery for treatment of their prostate or bladder cancer.
African American
This cohort will consist of 40 African American patients who are receiving either radiation or surgery for treatment of their prostate or bladder cancer.
Eligibility Criteria
A racially diverse cohort of 80 prostate and bladder cancer patients will be enrolled, including both male and female patients (n=40 Black; n=40 White) from the North Carolina Cancer Hospital's Multidisciplinary Urology and Radiation Oncology clinics
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Non-Hispanic Black and White patients with a known pathologic diagnosis of prostate or bladder cancer and intent to undergo treatment.
- Signed, IRB approved written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Initiation of cancer-directed treatment
- Race/ethnicity other than Non-Hispanic Black or Non-Hispanic White
- Inability to read and speak English
- Inability to comply with study for any other reason than language
- Dementia, altered mental status, or any psychiatric condition that would prohibit the understanding or rendering of informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Becky Green
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald Chen, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2017
First Posted
May 17, 2017
Study Start
May 8, 2017
Primary Completion
May 5, 2018
Study Completion
May 5, 2018
Last Updated
November 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No plan to make IPD available to other researchers