NCT03153956

Brief Summary

A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-arm clinical evaluation study to examine the efficacy of AposTherapy® versus a control group, in the short-term at 6 months and in the long-term at 12 months post-treatment, with the primary efficacy assessment based on improvement in knee pain score and improvement in function in patients following diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 16, 2015

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 15, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 15, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2017

Results QC Date

February 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AposTherapy® SystemOsteoarthritisTotal knee arthroplastiesDegenerative joint disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Total Score

    WOMAC evaluates the condition of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints. In this study, WOMAC scores were recomputed as the sum within sub-scales (pain score is the sum of questions 1-5; stiffness is the sum of questions 6-7; functional score is the sum of questions 8-24). The total score is reported as the sum of the pain, stiffness, and functional sub-scores for all participants. The total score range is 0-1292. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual Analog Score (VAS) Score

    12 Months

  • Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Total Score

    screening, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Study Arms (2)

Active Treatment Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Personally calibrated bio-mechanical device

Device: Calibrated AposTherapy®

Control Arm

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

sham-placebo device (similar shoes without bio-mechanical elements).

Device: Non-Calibrated Sham Apos Therapy Device

Interventions

a biomechanical device including 2 hemispheric biomechanical elements attached to a platform in a form of a shoe. the biomechanical device is calibrated to each patient by a physiotherapist specialized with the treatment methodology.

Active Treatment Arm

The comparator group will receive a non-calibrated sham device.

Control Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients suffering from symptomatic unilateral or bilateral knee OA at the medial compartment for at least six months;
  • Fulfilling the ACR clinical criteria;
  • Having radiographically assessed OA of the knee with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade more than or equal to grade 2; and,
  • Having VAS-Pain ≥ 3, on a scale between 0-10.
  • Patients who have a shoe size between US 4 and US 12

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients suffering from acute septic arthritis.
  • Patients who received a corticosteroid injection within 3 months of the study.
  • Patients who received hyaluronic acid (HA) injections within 6 months of the study
  • Patients suffering from avascular necrosis of the knee.
  • Patients with a history of knee buckling or recent knee injury.
  • Patients who have had a joint replacement or other major surgery to the knee, hip or ankle (ipsilateral or contralateral side).
  • Patients suffering from neuropathic arthropathy.
  • Patients with an increased tendency to fall.
  • Patients exhibiting a lack of physical or mental ability to perform or comply with the study procedure.
  • Patients with a history of pathological osteoporotic fracture.
  • Patients suffering from symptomatic degenerative arthritis in lower limb joints other than the knees.
  • Patients with referred pain in the knees from primary back or hip joint pain.
  • Patients with neurological deficits to the lower extremity (ex. foot drop)
  • Patients whose shoe size is less than US 4 and greater than US 12
  • Patients who have had arthroscopy within 6 months of the study
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

New York University School of Medicine

New York, New York, 10016, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, KneeOsteoarthritisJoint Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dennis A. Cardone, DO
Organization
NYU Langone Health

Study Officials

  • Dennis Cardone, DO

    NYU Langone Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Phase I - A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-arm clinical evaluation of patients who have been diagnosed with OA of the knee. The active treatment arm (personally calibrated biomechanical device) will be compared to a control arm (sham-placebo device) (similar shoes without biomechanical elements). Phase II - Open-label, cross-over study design. After the completion of phase one patients will be un-blinded to their group allocation. Patients that were allocated to the sham-placebo control group will cross to the active group and will receive the AposTherapy treatment. Patients that were allocated to the active group will continue with treatment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Posted

May 15, 2017

Study Start

April 16, 2015

Primary Completion

November 15, 2018

Study Completion

November 15, 2018

Last Updated

March 24, 2020

Results First Posted

March 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations