Study Stopped
Due to financial constraints, sponsor could not complete the study.
Efficacy of Cooled and Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation of the Geniculate Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
A Prospective Double Blind, Randomized Control Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Cool Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Conventional Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation of the Geniculate Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Osteoarthritic Knee Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This is a single center randomized controlled trial. Approximately 102 patients will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: cooled radiofrequency or conventional monopolar radiofrequency ablation. Patients with chronic knee pain, with moderate to severe osteoarthritis according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale for at least 6 months who have failed conservative therapy will be screened for the study. Then, patients will be enrolled based on reporting ≥50% pain relief after a fluoroscopic guided single diagnostic block of the geniculate nerves (superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial) with 0.5 ml of local anesthetic (2% Lidocaine). Baseline data will be collected for all enrolled patients. Outcomes will be measured at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Outcome measures will be: Visual analogue scale (VAS) both while at rest and during ambulation, Oxford knee scores, WOMAC, and global perceived effect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2022
CompletedApril 26, 2022
April 1, 2022
3.8 years
October 6, 2014
September 23, 2020
April 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evidence of Change in Knee Pain
A 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) score at 24 weeks post-treatment will be compared to baseline score to measure change in pain level. Change in Pain = (VAS at 24 weeks) - (VAS at baseline) The VAS consists of a 100 mm long line without marks between the 0 and 100 mm edges. Range of scale is 0 to 100 mm, where 0 means no pain and 100 mm means the worst pain imaginable. A negative change in VAS means a reduction in pain level after 24-weeks of treatment.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evidence of Functional Changes
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Cooled radiofrequency ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient is placed in supine position on a fluoroscopic table with a pillow under the popliteal fossa. An anterio-posterior fluoroscopic view of the tibio-femoral joint is obtained. Skin and subcutaneous tissues are anesthetized and a 17 g introducer needle is advanced percutaneously towards the junction of shaft with epicondyle until bone contact is made. The needle is then laterally displaced away from the bone. This process is performed at the superior medial and superior lateral aspects of the femur, and the inferior medial aspect of the tibia. The fluoroscope is placed in lateral view to guide the needle depth to be at the medial third of the femur or tibia. A cooled radiofrequency probe from a Pain Management Radiofrequency kit is advanced through the introducer. Following sensory and motor stimulation, cooled genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation is carried out at 60 Celsius for 150 seconds.
Monopolar radiofrequency ablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient is placed in supine position on a fluoroscopic table with a pillow under the popliteal fossa. An anterio-posterior fluoroscopic view of the tibio-femoral joint is obtained. Skin and subcutaneous tissues are anesthetized and a 16 g introducer needle is advanced percutaneously towards the junction of shaft with epicondyle until bone contact is made. The needle is then laterally displaced away from the bone. This process is performed at the superior medial and superior lateral aspects of the femur, and the inferior medial aspect of the tibia. The fluoroscope is placed in lateral view to guide the needle depth to be at the medial third of the femur or tibia. A conventional radiofrequency probe from a Pain Management Radiofrequency kit is advanced through the introducer. Following sensory and motor stimulation, genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation will be carried out at 80 Celsius for 90 seconds.
Interventions
Radiofrequency ablation uses the electrical field generated by a radiofrequency probe inserted near a nerve responsible for pain. Chronic pain sensation in the knee is generated at the genicular nerves. The physician locates the affected genicular nerve by injecting an anesthetic (lidocaine) that produces a sensory nerve block (i.e. anesthetic pain relief). A radiofrequency probe is inserted percutaneously near the affected nerve using a cannula/introducer and is then connected to a radiofrequency generator. This is set to stimulate sensory and motor response, which allows the physician to adjust the probe position for effective and safe treatment. Then radiofrequency is applied to the tissue for a short time (up to 150 seconds) in order to generate a target temperature (no more than 80 degrees Celsius). The increase in the temperature of the tissue ablates the affected nerve producing pain relief.
The pain management radiofrequency consists of a radiofrequency generator, a radiofrequency probe and an introducer/cannula. The introducer cannula is used to percutaneously position the probe in the appropriate location for treatment. The radiofrequency probe is an electrode that delivers the electric field that heats up the tissue. In cooled radiofrequency the electrode is surrounded by a water jacket that cools it while heat is generated. The generator is the instrument that provides the radiofrequency according to a particular temperature and time program. Temperature, tissue impedance and radiofrequency power are lalso monitored by the generator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have given their written informed consent to participate in this clinical study based on voluntary agreement after a thorough explanation of the patient's participation is provided to them.
- Female patients who are not pregnant and do not plan to become pregnant during the study. Females of child bearing potential must provide a negative pregnancy test provided by the study physician and must be using reliable contraception and must continue to use reliable contraception until study completion at 52 weeks. Non-childbearing potential is defined as postmenopausal for at least 2 years or surgical sterilization or hysterectomy at least 3 months before study start.
- Must be older than 18 years old..
- Must have chronic knee pain for at least 6 months.
- Must have radiologic evidence of OA of the knee, grade 2-4 based on the Kellgreen-Lawrence scale.
- Persistent pain despite the use of conservative treatment (physical therapy, oral analgesic, steroid injections).
- Must have a VAS score of at least 5 with ambulation.
- Subjects must be on a stable dose of pain medication regimen for at least 2 months.
- Greater than or equal to 50% improvement from blocks in target knee for duration of the anesthetic.
You may not qualify if:
- Knee pain must not be acute.
- Previous total knee replacement.
- Evidence of connective tissue disease.
- Patients who have a BMI greater than 40.
- Evidence of serious neurological or psychiatric disorders.
- Current opioid use must not be greater than or equal to 90 mg morphine equivalent per 24 hour period.
- Must not have radicular pain in the affected limb.
- Patients with uncorrected coagulation disorders or who are on anticoagulation therapy and cannot interrupt the therapy.
- Patients who have pacemakers or generators.
- Patient who are pregnant, breast-feeding or women of childbearing potential with positive pregnancy tests.
- Sexually active female patients of childbearing potential who are not willing to use adequate contraceptive measures to avoid pregnancy until week 52 of the study. Sexually active male patients who are not willing to use adequate contraceptive measures until week 52 of the study. Adequate methods of birth control include the following: Hormonal contraception (female patients) or use of at least one acceptable double-barrier method (for example: diaphragm plus spermicidal agent or condoms (male or female) plus spermicidal agent.), vasectomy, intrauterine device, and/or exclusive sexual partner for whom one of the above acceptable methods applies.
- Patients who have cancer or a past history of any cancer within 5 years prior to the time of informed consent, with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or a clinically significant infection.
- A clinically significant disorder such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary infarction, ischemic heart disease, cardiac dysrhythmia, myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure.
- Uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled pulmonary disease, or uncontrolled hypertension.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704, United States
Millennium Pain Center at Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526, United States
Methodist Comprehensive Spine and Pain Center - Millennium Pain Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
Related Publications (7)
Murphy L, Helmick CG. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective: A population-based review of the fourth most common cause of hospitalization in U.S. adults. Orthop Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;31(2):85-91. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e31824fcd42.
PMID: 22446800BACKGROUNDJordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LM, Callahan LF, Kalsbeek WD, Hochberg MC. Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):172-80.
PMID: 17216685BACKGROUNDPeat G, McCarney R, Croft P. Knee pain and osteoarthritis in older adults: a review of community burden and current use of primary health care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.2.91.
PMID: 11156538BACKGROUNDKaraman H, Tufek A, Kavak GO, Yildirim ZB, Uysal E, Celik F, Kaya S. Intra-articularly applied pulsed radiofrequency can reduce chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Aug;74(8):336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID: 21872812BACKGROUNDChoi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
PMID: 21055873BACKGROUNDIkeuchi M, Ushida T, Izumi M, Tani T. Percutaneous radiofrequency treatment for refractory anteromedial pain of osteoarthritic knees. Pain Med. 2011 Apr;12(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01086.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
PMID: 21463469BACKGROUNDVallejo R, Benyamin R, Tilley DM, Kelley CA, Cedeno DL. An ex vivo comparison of cooled-radiofrequency and bipolar-radiofrequency lesion size and the effect of injected fluids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):312-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000090.
PMID: 24781285BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination led to a number of subjects analyzed below the required statistical power to measure a significant difference between the means
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Cedeno
- Organization
- Lumbrera LLC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ricardo Vallejo, MD, PhD
Millennium Pain Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2014
First Posted
October 9, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 15, 2018
Study Completion
June 26, 2019
Last Updated
April 26, 2022
Results First Posted
April 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04